Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))

2016-09-21 Thread Janko Mihelić 
sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 10:42 Martin Koppenhoefer 
napisao je:

>
> I am not sure if publishing the differences would be ok, but looking at
> them to decide where to survey is ok I think.
>

This service would be a personal tool for people to use, so no publishing.
Although you could share the link. I'm not sure what constitutes as
publishing.


> In your above sentence, rather than "which osm data is wrong" it should be
> "where osm data is different".
>

That's right.

Janko
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))

2016-09-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer 


sent from a phone

> Il giorno 21 set 2016, alle ore 09:54, Janko Mihelić  ha 
> scritto:
> 
> and only show which OSM data is wrong according to the closed source. Then 
> mappers would go survey the shop. Would this be OK?


I am not sure if publishing the differences would be ok, but looking at them to 
decide where to survey is ok I think. In your above sentence, rather than 
"which osm data is wrong" it should be "where osm data is different".

cheers,
Martin ___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk