Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
> Gesendet: Montag, 25. Juli 2016 16:22
> An: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> Betreff: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] attributive data enrichment using OSM
>
> IMHO it is rather unclear
>
> a) who is contracting the work you are supposed to do
>
> b) who
other legal discussions. <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
> Betreff: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] attributive data enrichment using OSM
>
> On Monday 25 July 2016, Stefan Jäger wrote:
> >
> > "Viral aspects" like Martin puts it, sound a bit like a disease :-)
>
> The
On Monday 25 July 2016, Stefan Jäger wrote:
>
> "Viral aspects" like Martin puts it, sound a bit like a disease :-)
The connotation of the term 'viral' has changed quite a bit. Viral
marketing for example has - at least for those initiating it - a quite
positive appeal.
> However, If I
Hi,
On 07/25/2016 09:05 AM, Stefan Jäger wrote:
> That, in turn, means, any data put together using also OSM data, that is not
> publicly accessible, but only in internal networks, can be produced?
In the terms of ODbL, "publicly" means (quote)
"to Persons other than You or under Your control
Hi Stefan, and thanks for writing to this mailing list.
Your case is not much different from geocoding, when you borrow some attributes
(addresses, or in your case, POI or landuse tags) from OSM and put it into a
proprietary database. That would clearly make a derived database out of your
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 22 lug 2016, alle ore 14:46, Stefan Jäger ha
> scritto:
>
> My question now is: if we enrich our data (with only underlying attributes,
> no geometry from OSM at all) with such a process using OSM data, is this then
> a produced work (or a
Thanks fort he quick answer,
Actually I did consult the mentioned guideline , however, I could not really
relate it 100% to my use case.
That's what I hope for some clarification here.
Stefan
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org