Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

back, on windows I tried with python 3.9.6, this gives me a single test fail: == FAIL: test_TryStar (leo.unittests.core.test_leoAst.TestTOG) -- Traceback (most

Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

I pulled latest devel on my *windows* 10 machine, All tests pass on* python 3.11.* I then pulled the latest devel on my *linux* machine. tested in *python 3.9 and 3.10.* they both give the same two failed tests: == FAIL:

ChatGPT Helpful In Translating Tables

Very thoughtful piece by Jon Udell - Why LLM-assisted table transformation is a big deal . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To

Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

Python 3.10 on Ubuntu: === warnings summary === leo/plugins/leo_babel/tests/lib_test.py:118 /home/tom/git/leo-editor/leo/plugins/leo_babel/tests/lib_test.py:118: PytestCollectionWarning: cannot collect test class 'TestCmdr' because it

Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

Python 3.9 on Linux Mint: === warnings summary === leo/plugins/leo_babel/tests/lib_test.py:118 /home/tom/git/leo-editor/leo/plugins/leo_babel/tests/lib_test.py:118: PytestCollectionWarning: cannot collect test class 'TestCmdr' because

Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

Python 3.11 on Manjaro Linux: warnings summary leo/plugins/leo_babel/tests/lib_test.py:118 /home/tom/git/leo-editor/leo/plugins/leo_babel/tests/lib_test.py:118: PytestCollectionWarning: cannot collect test class

Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

On Windows 10, python 3.11, pytest passes all tests. python 3.10: warnings summary leo\plugins\leo_babel\tests\lib_test.py:118 C:\Tom\git\leo-editor\leo\plugins\leo_babel\tests\lib_test.py:118: PytestCollectionWarning: cannot collect

Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 3:12 PM Félix wrote: Please review PR #3398 . I've tested it on ubuntu and windows. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: Please test Leo's options code in devel

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 3:12 PM Félix wrote: > ... single test now fails under python 3.9 [and 3.10]... Also, under linux, an additional test fails. Thanks for the testing! I'll fix these immediately. In other news, on leojs side of things, I went from 37 failing tests last > week, to two (2)

Re: PR #3397 (screen shots) is ready for review

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 1:06 PM Thomas Passin wrote: > It's in the plugins directory but not in LeoPyRef as yet. LeoPyRef.leo contains screenshots.py. There is also a screen_capture.py plugin ... how do they differ? > I don't remember :-) I suspect both plugins are seldom/never used. Edward

Re: PR #3397 (screen shots) is ready for review

Oh, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that the PR had already been merged. What I'm looking at in the plugins directory must be the old version. On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 2:06:53 PM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote: > It's in the plugins directory but not in LeoPyRef as yet. There is also a

Re: PR #3397 (screen shots) is ready for review

It's in the plugins directory but not in LeoPyRef as yet. There is also a screen_capture.py plugin ... how do they differ? On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 1:59:15 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > PR #3397 : > > 1. Removes all traces of the

PR #3397 (screen shots) is ready for review

PR #3397 : 1. Removes all traces of the --screen-shot command-line option. 2. Adds two new commands when the screenshots.py plugin is enabled: - take-local-screen-shot captures Leo's main window. - take-global -screen-shot captures the

Re: GitHub seems to be buggy or down

On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 7:19:49 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: I noticed last night that the diffs in PR #3393 were *wrong*. All now seems well. The diffs are correct in PR #3393 and everywhere else I have looked. Edward -- You

Re: GitHub seems to be buggy or down

Interesting.  Nothing on their status page:  https://www.githubstatus.com/On Jun 18, 2023, at 8:19 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:I noticed last night that the diffs in PR #3393 were wrong.There was a glitch creating the PR and I assumed at the time that the glitch might have been the cause of the

GitHub seems to be buggy or down

I noticed last night that the diffs in PR #3393 were *wrong*. There was a glitch creating the PR and I assumed at the time that the glitch might have been the cause of the bad diffs. This morning I see that *no* diffs are available anywhere.

Please test Leo's options code in devel

The latest revisions: 1. PR #3393 , merged last night. TestLeoImport.test_recursive_import has been improved: - The test uses a non-existent directory as the "dir_" arg, which should ensure that the test will work on any installation. - The