On 07/24/2011 07:39 PM, David Shaw wrote:
Probably bad form to reply to my own post, but, hey...
Actually, while I think this idea has merit, there is a flaw which can
be summed up in one word.
Dependencies.
I'll go away and think a little more about it.
Hi,
you mention dependencies. Have
Hi,
First of all, please accept my apologies if what I'm about to write
seems rather incoherent or is just plain impractical - I'm not a linux
guru (candidate for 'Understatement of the Year' there :-) ) and don't
really know what I'm talking about :-)
Anyway...
I've been thinking
On 25/07/11 09:50, Andy Bennett wrote:
Check out encap and epkg if you haven't already.
Regards,
@ndy
Thanks for that :-) I hadn't come across encap before, so that was
really interesting, but it doesn't quite fit the bill, unfortunately. I
was thinking that, by doing the
First of all, please accept my apologies if what I'm about to write
seems rather incoherent or is just plain impractical - I'm not a linux
guru (candidate for 'Understatement of the Year' there :-) ) and don't
really know what I'm talking about :-)
Anyway...
I've been thinking about package
Probably bad form to reply to my own post, but, hey...
Actually, while I think this idea has merit, there is a flaw which can
be summed up in one word.
Dependencies.
I'll go away and think a little more about it.
David Shaw
On 24/07/11 15:39, David Shaw wrote:
First of all, please accept
