Re: [lfs-support] error when trying to cross compile glibc-2.19

2014-04-23 Thread marian
Thanks all. Indeed changing the target name, was the solution to be able to build. Marian On Apr 19, 2014, at 12:42 AM, mar...@byteanywhere.com wrote: Thanks all for the replays. I am trying to create a cross compiler using the steps for building LFS when the temporary tools are build.

Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

2014-04-23 Thread xinglp
2014-04-23 13:55 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com: xinglp wrote: 2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. kre...@email.com: On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only

[lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread TheOldFellow
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread xinglp
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com: Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard. Viceversa,

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread xinglp
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com: Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard. Viceversa,

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread xinglp
sorry for typo. :-) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread Armin K.
On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote: 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com: Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread TheOldFellow
Armin K. wrote: On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote: 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com: Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow theoldfel...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard, Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to use okular (although I hate its terminal-spamming) and I believe

Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out

2014-04-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
TheOldFellow wrote: Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. You may find

[lfs-support] gcc-4.9.0 failure

2014-04-23 Thread Frans de Boer
I could not compile 4.9.0 since it always fails when staring to configure for 'libvtv' as showed next: ... make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libgcc' make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libgcc' Checking

Re: [lfs-support] gcc-4.9.0 failure

2014-04-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: I could not compile 4.9.0 since it always fails when staring to configure for 'libvtv' as showed next: [snip] Any suggestion? Frans. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/3552 Pierre seems to be on the case - so