On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:14:23 -0400 (EDT), Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
You can use gdb instead of pstack:
$ gdb lftp PID
...attached...
(gdb) bt
OK, here's the results from using gdb, but I don't know how useful it is.
There's a lot of ?? labels. As a review, I enter
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:31:59AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:14:23 -0400 (EDT), Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
You can use gdb instead of pstack:
$ gdb lftp PID
...attached...
(gdb) bt
OK, here's the results from using gdb, but I don't know how
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:59:38 -0400 (EDT), Alexander Lukyanov wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:26:00 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
Yes, the patch worked, for this specific test case. But I am having
a problem connecting to a different server which does not support
TLS. In this case, I'm
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:57:23PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
I cannot reproduce it. Please use strace on the lftp process, also use
pstack PID on it and send me the output.
I can reproduce the problem if I run the lftp command directly at a
shell prompt, but if I run the lftp command
I cannot reproduce it. Please use strace on the lftp process, also use
pstack PID on it and send me the output.
2014-09-26 6:26 GMT+04:00 Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 01:49:57 -0400 (EDT), Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:02:29PM -0400,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 01:49:57 -0400 (EDT), Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:02:29PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
I tried setting both of these server options to yes and tried my get with
lftp again. The last few lines of output in the debug file are now as
follows:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:22:08 -0400 (EDT), Alexander Lukyanov wrote:
On 2014-09-19 3:24 GMT+04:00 Stephen Powell wrote:
As to your claim that the new development snapshot of lftp
does indeed send a close_notify alert to the server prior to
closing the control connection when TLS is used, I
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:02:29PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
I tried setting both of these server options to yes and tried my get with
lftp again. The last few lines of output in the debug file are now as
follows:
Got EOF on data connection
Closing data socket
--- 426 Failure
Look for gnutls_bye (gnutls) or SSL_shutdown (openssl) calls. See
https://github.com/lavv17/lftp/commit/fc468dc987cb45bab4a3d31a1e832601bc239774
for the change.
2014-09-19 3:24 GMT+04:00 Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com:
As to your claim that the new development snapshot of lftp
does indeed
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:55:52 -0400 (EDT), Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:38:10PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
Of course, to avoid errors on the server, lftp is sending a close_notify
alert before closing the write side of the connection on its end, right?
I have
Can you send me a sample of the script?
2014-09-17 6:36 GMT+04:00 Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:38:21 -0400 (EDT), Alexander Lukyanov wrote:
Here is a patch to make lftp wait for QUIT reply at exit. I think to
avoid
lingering one can set use-quit no.
OK.
Here is an additional patch to wait for QUIT reply after close command.
2014-09-17 10:50 GMT+04:00 Alexander Lukyanov lavv...@gmail.com:
Ok, I could reproduce the proble you see. For now try to remove the
close command from the script.
2014-09-17 10:47 GMT+04:00 Alexander Lukyanov
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:55:36 -0400 (EDT), Alexander Lukyanov wrote:
Here is an additional patch to wait for QUIT reply after close command.
OK, now the problem is fixed. But I'm now getting an error message
that I wasn't getting before. The last four lines of debug output are
as follows:
Here is a patch to make lftp wait for QUIT reply at exit. I think to avoid
lingering one can set use-quit no.
2014-09-16 3:44 GMT+04:00 Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:04:36 -0400 (EDT), Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
As far as I can tell, lftp does not wait for
With set ftp:use-quit yes in effect, which is the default value for this
option,
lftp will issue the QUIT command to the server in response to an lftp close
command. But lftp does not wait for the server to respond with the 221
Goodbye
message before closing the control connection. Sometimes,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:06:02PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
With set ftp:use-quit yes in effect, which is the default value for this
option,
lftp will issue the QUIT command to the server in response to an lftp close
command. But lftp does not wait for the server to respond with the 221
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:04:36 -0400 (EDT), Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
As far as I can tell, lftp does not wait for QUIT reply only when it
exits. Is it really necessary to linger at exit to wait for clean
connection shutdown?
Well, I don't know if necessary is the right word; but it is the
17 matches
Mail list logo
