Hi,
I have started to make changes to the Torservers.net website to reflect
that we have grown from professional Tor Exit hosting to a state where
growth of a single organization is not very useful any more. We have
refrained from ramping up more exit capacity for quite some time because
of that:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:45:37PM +0100, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
Suggestion 1: Can we trial putting the UNSUBSCRIBE footer (that part of the
e-mail that no-one reads) at the top of the e-mail so everyone sees it?
No, because then *everybody* has to see it.
--
Too many emails?
Which is worse:
- Everyone having to read the footer, or
- Several idiotic how do I unsubscribe from this? emails per week?
Serious question.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:45:37PM +0100, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
Perhaps this is an indicator that we need to rethink the design of mailing
lists perhaps? I see the same problem in a lot of other mailing lists.
--
Simeon Oriko | Digital and Innovation Strategist
Web: www.mtotowajirani.com | Twitter: @mtotowajirani
LinkedIn: ke.linkedin.com/in/simeonoriko
On 03 April, 2013 - Jillian C. York wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:45:37PM +0100, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
Suggestion 1: Can we trial putting the UNSUBSCRIBE footer (that part of
the
e-mail that no-one
Oh, I'm in agreement that top-posting is awful. And I may be conflating
this mailing list with others (in overstating the problem), but it is
enough of an annoyance that I would consider harsh measures ;)
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Petter Ericson pett...@acc.umu.se wrote:
On 03 April,
My suggestion is to remove the dash-dash-space that precedes the
unsubscribe notice. Lots of people have settings that automatically hide
these footers.
~Griffin
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Jillian C. York jilliancy...@gmail.comwrote:
Oh, I'm in agreement that top-posting is awful. And
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Griffin Boyce griffinbo...@gmail.com wrote:
My suggestion is to remove the dash-dash-space that precedes the
unsubscribe notice.
Should I remind that this was *also* the result of a vote on 21.8.2012?
3. Eliminate signature, modify, or leave as is?
a. Eliminate
On 3 April 2013 13:47, Maxim Kammerer m...@dee.su wrote:
Should I remind that this was *also* the result of a vote on 21.8.2012?
Maybe a periodic vote about what colours to paint the various bike sheds
would be useful?
Have we had votes on:
* The name of the list
* The format of the subject
err, I haven't seen any indications that we have libtech members that use
screen readers... sorry for the double post.
best, Joe
--
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Senior Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy Technology
https://www.cdt.org/
On Apr 3, 2013, at 10:33, Joseph Lorenzo Hall j...@cdt.org
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:33:17AM -0400, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
Top-posting is definitely worse. Don't do it.
A very minor point that isn't especially relevant to libtech, I suspect: I
work with a number of blind advocates and top-posting makes their lives much,
much easier (since
Joe, how would you see? '-) (I do, unless I'm in front of my ginormous
monitor.)
--
James S. Tyre
Law Offices of James S. Tyre
10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512
Culver City, CA 90230-4969
310-839-4114/310-839-4602(fax)
jst...@jstyre.com
Policy Fellow, Electronic Frontier Foundation
On 4/3/13 10:37 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:33:17AM -0400, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
Top-posting is definitely worse. Don't do it.
A very minor point that isn't especially relevant to libtech, I suspect: I
work with a number of blind advocates and top-posting
Any texts that people see every day becomes invisible. Like footers. It's
perceptual psych. Fixing the footer will not help, and fixing humans is
arguably outside the scope of this list.
Any texts that people see erupt repeatedly (over voting on mailing lists,
checking Snopes first, or bike
The SecDev Foundation is pleased to announce the launch of the Syria Digital
Security Monitor. This site maps and visualizes reports of disruption to
critical infrastructure in Syria which includes internet, telecommunication,
electricity and water, and reports on cyber threats. The project
Thanks!
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would you like to give some more context on what it is you are trying to do?
remote wipe software for windows.
On 3 Apr 2013, at 18:08, Katy P wrote:
Thanks!
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
If my laptop was stolen, for example, some website or something that I (or
someone else) could log into and delete the contents of the laptop's hard
drive.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb
ei8...@ei8fdb.orgwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:16:08AM -0700, Katy P wrote:
If my laptop was stolen, for example, some website or something that I (or
someone else) could log into and delete the contents of the laptop's hard
drive.
Or you could use an encrypting filesystem, which requires a password
on boot, and
What is easier for a lay person and least susceptible to a smart thief?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:16:08AM -0700, Katy P wrote:
If my laptop was stolen, for example, some website or something that I
(or
someone else)
Well, http://preyproject.com/ would be better for a layperson who doesn't
have the time/interest to encrypt. But it's not impossible to disable or
anything. And in the meantime the thief would have access to your data.
Depends on whether you are more looking to get it back (no guarantees), or
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Katy P katyca...@gmail.com wrote:
What is easier for a lay person and least susceptible to a smart thief?
Despite what it says in my signature, I'm no thief. That said, were I to
steal laptop, the first action I'd take is to remove the drive before
powering it
Griffin Boyce writes:
Well, http://preyproject.com/ would be better for a layperson who doesn't
have the time/interest to encrypt. But it's not impossible to disable or
anything. And in the meantime the thief would have access to your data.
Depends on whether you are more looking to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So the objective Kathy has mentioned is to:
log into and delete the contents of the laptop's hard drive
It would seem the contents of the hard disk is more important than the actual
hardware.
In that case I would go for the encryption option. Yes
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Katy P katyca...@gmail.com wrote:
What is easier for a lay person and least susceptible to a smart thief?
Remote wipe schemes are easy for dumb thieves to circumvent because they
just have to not hook up the stolen hardware to the Internet to avoid them.
Hi Lib Tech,
I think of Yahoo! as kind of our Minitrue, so the frequent war reports
between US and North Korea is worrying me...Yahoo! reports that the
Anonymous is hacking North Korea. What % of these hackers do you think are
usual Anonymous hacktivists? Also, what do people expect to happen to
26 matches
Mail list logo
