-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've been thinking about this for a while, and can't find a logical reason.
Possibly I'm not thinking about it hard enough.
I'm curious as to why Bluecoat seem to be singled out for all this attention
regarding use in countries where the
On 4/6/13 11:50 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
Hi,
I've been thinking about this for a while, and can't find a logical
reason. Possibly I'm not thinking about it hard enough.
I'm curious as to why Bluecoat seem to be singled out for all this
attention regarding use in countries where the
Honestly? Because there is ample evidence to support it at the moment. I
would also suggest that it's only singled out in the US - in Europe, the
focus right now is on Gamma (FinFisher) and Amesys, largely.
Activists have been accused in the past of singling out Cisco as well.
Attention has
To me, the real question is, *If* Bluecoat, why are things going so well
for them when they are a 45 minute drive from activists in San Francisco?
Happy to explain--off this list--what this means in terms of political
strategy and offline, nonviolent direct action.
This is definitely not an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It was an honest question Jillian. No ulterior motive.
I would argue there is ample evidence to support it for Cisco, Redback,
Ericsson, Siemens, NSN, F5, Apache Squidthe list goes on.
I have read stories from European media (I can't give you
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Kate Krauss ka...@critpath.org wrote:
To me, the real question is, *If* Bluecoat, why are things going so well
for them when they are a 45 minute drive from activists in San Francisco?
Happy to explain--off this list--what this means in terms of political
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I left the other wonderful people out: ZTE and their monitoring centre (shown
in pictures from Libya), and of course Huawei.
Just to give a good global representation.
On 6 Apr 2013, at 15:41, Jillian C. York wrote:
Honestly? Because there is
