@Tony,
The secret that keeps your data accessible to you alone is your SpiderOak
password, which is never transmitted to SpiderOak in its original form.
https://spideroak.com/engineering_matters
--
Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google.
Violations of list
Quickly adding my blog post on the matter to this thread. Would love to hear
discussion regarding it:
http://log.nadim.cc/?p=33
NK
On 2013-08-13, at 1:58 AM, Tony Arcieri basc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ali-Reza Anghaie a...@packetknife.com
wrote:
I'm sorry but
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Percy Alpha percyal...@gmail.com wrote:
@Tony,
The secret that keeps your data accessible to you alone is your SpiderOak
password, which is never transmitted to SpiderOak in its original form.
https://spideroak.com/engineering_matters
Again, they seem to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Arjen,
May I ask what Swiss providers would you recommend?
(disclaimer: I am normally very hesitant to 'advertise' for
specific companies since as a consultant I do my very best to
remain independent from having any interest in procurement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/13 21:32, Francisco Ruiz wrote:
So, here's my question. Does any one know of a celebrity who cares
enough about computer security to be persuaded to take one minute
of his/her time to read a hash before a camera?
I'd like to second
Maybe the celebrity could read the binary sequence of a compiled program,
and the user could take dictation into a simple command line script?
On 13 August 2013 10:37, Michael Rogers mich...@briarproject.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/13 21:32, Francisco
On 08/13/2013 12:32 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Percy Alpha percyal...@gmail.com
mailto:percyal...@gmail.com wrote:
@Tony,
The secret that keeps your data accessible to you alone is your
SpiderOak password, which is never transmitted to SpiderOak
Hi guys:
Safe and secure are relevant. But, Arjen is absolutely right, Switzerland
is at the moment the best place to have your materials hosted. It's also the
place where Silent Circle looks at. And one where Wikileaks is hosted. Some
on this list still have doubts, even about Switzerland.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:24:07AM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
Thank you EFF for the well-written reminder:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/08/google-fiber-continues-awful-isp-tradition-banning-servers
[...]
We should petition Google
On 13.08.2013 10:51, Ralph Holz wrote:
SwissVPN provides some nice VPN services but it is not the only
VPN provider I use.
They log for 6 months and say they will respond to requests under
Swiss law.
I would be surprised if other Swiss providers wouldn't do the same,
but I am very happy to
Oligarchs and privacy advocates have something in common.
If you got a better place, please name it.
And by the by, forget Germany, it may not have data retention (for now), but
it does have 50,000 American troops, a refurbished Bad Aibling with all
newly trained German personnel, and a huge
On 13.08.2013 14:20, taxakis wrote:
Oligarchs and privacy advocates have something in common.
If you got a better place, please name it.
I don't. I still believe we should stop being naive and promote Iceland
or Switzerland, just because we think they offer better privacy. In
general, just
They've also been working on an open source version of their client
and server software called crypton (https://crypton.io/)
It implements the protocol originally listed on their site as Elijah
pointed out with the wayback machine.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:52 AM, elijah eli...@riseup.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Michael Rogers
mich...@briarproject.org wrote:
The app store can't substitute a different binary (no developer signing
key), users
can verify that the app was what the developer produced (via pulling the
binary and
checking the hash), and advanced users can
Hey LibTech,
In a recently published interview with the New York Times, Edward Snowden
called unencrypted communications between journalists and sources unforgivably
reckless:
I was surprised to realize that there were people in news organizations who
didn’t recognize any unencrypted message
So not sure this is taking the discussion in a direction useful to this
list, but a thought-- celebrities are not likely to be available to do
something like this -- i.e., a series of readings on youtube videos --
unless the videos were connected to a high-profile campaign, a
film/documentary, or
Hi Nadim all,
Le 13 août 2013 à 18:00, Nadim Kobeissi na...@nadim.cc a écrit :
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/magazine/snowden-maass-transcript.html
I hope sending this along will be useful for journalists on this list as well
as for those who need extra material to help them convince
The passage Nadim highlights is of course quite appropriate for this list. But
for those
who have some extra time (it's very long) the whole article is worth reading.
--
James S. Tyre
Law Offices of James S. Tyre
10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512
Culver City, CA 90230-4969
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:10:39AM +0200, Guido Witmond wrote:
There is another problem. You rely on HTTPS. Here is the 64000 dollar
question:
Q._What is the CA-certificate for your banks' website?_
I ask that question to anyone who claims to be security conscious. No
one has given me
Libtech -- This might be promising for the academics and researchers
amongst us.
http://cgcsblog.asc.upenn.edu/2013/07/31/internet-policy-observatory-call-for-proposals/
Internet Policy Observatory: Call for Proposals
The Center for Global Communication Studies (CGCS) at the Annenberg School
On 08/13/2013 09:00 AM, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
I hope sending this along will be useful for journalists on this list as
well as for those who need extra material to help them convince their
journalist friends to adopt privacy-preserving practices. As usual, I'll
take the opportunity to again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/2013 10:51 AM, Ralph Holz wrote:
That's the company I use, too - and ultimately the reason I am
asking because Chris Soghoian once told me that they log the
connections. This seems to be supported by this inquiry made in
2011:
Hi Libtechies,
I hope you don't mind me putting this press release here. Please spread
if you like it.
--
# Zwiebelfreunde take over popular onion.to Tor gateway
(Dresden, 13.8.2013) The non-profit organization Zwiebelfreunde
Hi all,
I didn't see any individuals or orgs from libtech comment to ICANN on
the recent report to reform WHOIS. I wanted to put this on your
collective radar if it's of interest to you.
TL;DR: ICANN is working on reforming WHOIS, and their Experts' Working
Group has come up with a pretty bad
Hi Kyle, don't take it so hard. I asked this question so _everybody_ who'd
like to try the celebrity video trick would be able to collect a few likely
candidates. Likely others will beat me to it.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Kyle Maxwell ky...@xwell.org wrote:
I didn't know LibTech had
Hi Guido,
This looks very interesting, but I have trouble understanding it. Can you
give me a sample URL where this is being shown in action?
Many thanks.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Guido Witmond gu...@witmond.nl wrote:
Dear professor Ruiz.
The real issue is to create an *easy* way
Haven't hackers always been portrayed in a way to scare people? * If it's not
dDoSing script kiddies, its zombie network owning Latvian mafias..
If this *is* the case, how can General Alexander go to Blackhat 2013 and say
(paraphrasing) we (CIA) use the same tools as you do. Help us protect
I don't think I've seen educated speculation here about what the court
order that Lavabit received actually ordered them to do. Here is my own
guess and I'm wondering if people have thoughts.
First, from an interview with Ladar Levison (
http://possibility.com/LavabitArchitecture.html ) it seems
Hi Steve. I want to thank you for taking your time to help me. Your
comments are awesome. May I follow up with some short questions, right
after some of your comments?
Many thanks in advance.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Steve Weis stevew...@gmail.com wrote:
Francisco, you assume that all
On 13.08.2013 23:54, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
This is all to say that I suspect the government's order requested
ongoing access to the private key(s) in memory for some subset of
Lavabit users, such that they could ask in the future for the encrypted
contents of those users' accounts and
Oh. Yes. I definitely remember reading User Authentication Process a
few weeks ago. That's why I feel like they implement the zero-knowledge psw
proof.
Why did they take it down? NSA on the move already?
Percy Alpha(PGP https://en.greatfire.org/contact#alt)
GreatFire.org Team
On Tue, Aug 13,
Hi Francisco. I split this off into a new thread, since it touches on some
points on why the security model for Passlok is broken.
Comments inline...
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Francisco Ruiz r...@iit.edu wrote:
1. Unicode: wget returned escaped Unicode characters. Chrome saved output
32 matches
Mail list logo
