Oh, a Google employee. I know what to expect.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 07:39:04AM -0700, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
I would kindly ask you to mention in the opening words
that such an API can only be used in an opportunistic
fashion as the JS code intended to use this API itself
somehow has to be
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:31:29AM +0200, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
Hi all,
Could we keep here a positive and constructive mindset. Just saying...
Virginie
liberationtech is a political mailing list. You have chosen to
advertize your politically questionable work on this list, so
you get
Hi all,
Could we keep here a positive and constructive mindset. Just saying...
Virginie
-Original Message-
From: carlo von lynX [mailto:l...@time.to.get.psyced.org]
Sent: samedi 24 mai 2014 09:31
To: Ryan Sleevi
Cc: public-webcrypto-comme...@w3.org; liberationtech
Subject: Re:
Carlo,
I have no problem by getting feedback about the political context and what is
at stake behind good or bad crypto. And even hearing our deliverable is
questionable. As chair of the web crypto, I even encourage that.
To be more specific the point that made me reacting was Oh, a Google
Il 5/24/14, 10:36 AM, carlo von lynX ha scritto:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:31:29AM +0200, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
Hi all,
Could we keep here a positive and constructive mindset. Just saying...
Virginie
liberationtech is a political mailing list.
I personally hate such a definition of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014.05.24 09.54, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to share your view with us. You
are pointing us to an interesting problem, that we discussed
intensively. We are currently trying to see how to word warning to
On May 24, 2014, at 12:30 AM, carlo von lynX l...@time.to.get.psyced.org
wrote:
Oh, a Google employee. I know what to expect.
and then I deleted the rest of the content. Sorry but if that’s how you want to
start a post, the rest isn’t worth the bother.
Al Billings
alb...@openbuddha.com
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 07:38:50AM -0700, Al Billings wrote:
On May 24, 2014, at 12:30 AM, carlo von lynX l...@time.to.get.psyced.org
wrote:
Oh, a Google employee. I know what to expect.
and then I deleted the rest of the content. Sorry but if that?s how you want
to start a post, the
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Gregory Foster
gfos...@entersection.org wrote:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/united-states-of-secrets/
http://video.pbs.org/video/2365245528/
... Also available at ThoughtMaybe:
http://thoughtmaybe.com/the-united-states-of-secrets/
anyone know where
Quoth coderman:
anyone know where to obtain a stand-alone video file for DL?
(any encodings OK...)
Part 1: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:71678c3be35556b49ae8cf1c8657d067052cf827
Part 2: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:d6d534d1de3ad8ae995313636d2e437941c107b9
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 05:50:46PM -0700, coderman wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Gregory Foster
gfos...@entersection.org wrote:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/united-states-of-secrets/
http://video.pbs.org/video/2365245528/
... Also available at ThoughtMaybe:
On Sat, May 24, 2014, at 08:00 PM, Andrew Cady wrote:
http://kickass.to/frontline-2014-united-states-of-secrets-1of2-the-program-x264-hdtv-mvgroup-org-t9133860.html
http://kickass.to/frontline-2014-united-states-of-secrets-2of2-privacy-lost-x264-hdtv-mvgroup-org-t9135777.html
Same
12 matches
Mail list logo
