Ah, yes, those expensive man-hours. Security is so much easier when you don't
give it time and attention. It also doesn't work.
-Bill
On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:09, anonymous2...@nym.hush.com
anonymous2...@nym.hush.com wrote:
I knew this was coming at some point. Yes I
Can we please get back to the issue at hand
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:16:03 + Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net
wrote:
Ah, yes, those expensive man-hours. Security is so much easier
when you don't give it time and attention. It also doesn't work.
-Bill
On Feb 28, 2013,
Sorry, thought you'd asked for advice about the best possible way to do it.
Didn't realize you meant best possible with no time or attention. But, wait,
that's not quite it either, is it? You meant that you don't want to invest
_your_ time and attention, but you think people on the list can
Frankly your whats wrong with a small minority of the people on
LibTech. NGO's have to balance cost, security, people, user needs,
current infrastructure, software/hardware donation programs, man
hours etc etc...Every idiot knows Linux is more secure in many ways
than Windows yet sometimes
..on Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:08:54PM +, anonymous2...@nym.hush.com wrote:
I knew this was coming at some point. Yes I am starting with
Windows, it's more functional (awaits incoming) and costs less in
terms of expensive man hours (the hidden cost vs software) for an
Linux guru to run
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:43:38PM +, anonymous2...@nym.hush.com wrote:
Every idiot knows Linux is more secure in many ways
than Windows yet sometimes other factors come into play that
require the use of MS.
No. MS is never required. I've heard that contention for decades and
it's
