Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-22 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:53:36PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography Doesn't really work. Essentially, this

Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-22 Thread Charles Zeitler
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote: On 22/02/13 03:53, Charles Zeitler wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote:

Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-21 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive snake oil. -- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:

Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-21 Thread Charles Zeitler
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive snake oil. so, it's been tried, eh? can you post a link?

Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-21 Thread Andreas Bader
On 22/02/13 03:53, Charles Zeitler wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive snake oil. so,