On 28 July 2013 12:44, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb ei8...@ei8fdb.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two separate secure
Jabber servers with no-logging. I cannot vouch for the validity of them.
IMO, any alternative to
Hi Ben,
Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
On 28 July 2013 12:44, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb ei8...@ei8fdb.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two separate
secure Jabber servers with no-logging. I cannot vouch for the
On 29 July 2013 16:04, Bernard Tyers ei8...@ei8fdb.org wrote:
Hi Ben,
Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
On 28 July 2013 12:44, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb ei8...@ei8fdb.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two separate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two separate secure
Jabber servers with no-logging. I cannot vouch for the validity of them.
IMO, any alternative to running the now closed (as in no non-GTalk users can
talk directly) Google
On 7/28/2013 6:44 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two
separate secure Jabber servers with no-logging. I cannot vouch
for the validity of them.
IMO, any alternative to running the now closed (as in no non-GTalk
users can talk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Jul 2013, at 13:21, John Perry wrote:
On 7/28/2013 6:44 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two
separate secure Jabber servers with no-logging. I cannot vouch
for the validity of them.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/28/2013 7:38 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
On 28 Jul 2013, at 13:21, John Perry wrote:
On 7/28/2013 6:44 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two
separate secure Jabber servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/28/2013 6:44 AM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
For those interested, these two forwarded mails mention two
separate secure Jabber servers with no-logging. I cannot vouch
for the validity of them.
IMO, any alternative to running the now
