IANAL, but it seems to me that if the judge does not call the lawyers into
chambers for consultation, there is no period of commentary on sentencing,
or adjustment period.
If the plea is innocent, then the sentence can be appealed through a trial
at a higher court -- however, Hammond opted due to
On 20 Nov 2013, at 22:17, Shava Nerad shav...@gmail.com wrote:
IANAL, but it seems to me that if the judge does not call the lawyers into
chambers for consultation, there is no period of commentary on sentencing, or
adjustment period.
IAANAL, so you’ll have to explain the significance of
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb
ei8...@ei8fdb.orgwrote:
On 20 Nov 2013, at 22:17, Shava Nerad shav...@gmail.com wrote:
IANAL, but it seems to me that if the judge does not call the lawyers
into chambers for consultation, there is no period of commentary on
It seems a similar stupidly idiotic requirement to the one imposed on Kevin
Mitnick when he was released.
From memory the requirment on him was that he wasn’t allowed to use “computers
or telephony” equipment. It might have been possible in the early 2000’s but
today?
IANAL, but would it be
From: Privarchy Mee privar...@gmail.com
Can any of you, most of whom I do not doubt are far more knowledgeable
about cryptography and how it's conceptualised within the legal
sphere, offer some insight regarding this?
https://twitter.com/CyMadD0x/status/401443518612512769
The claim is that
Depending on your definition, that means no cell/cordless phone use
(cordlesss phones, GSM, CDMA are technically encrypted), wifi (other then
open wireless access points), ssl, bluetooth, RFID credit/check cards.
Does cable TV count since that signal is encrypted between the cable
company and
It is so common for judges to be complètement sans clue regarding
technology -- I'm sure the judge has no idea how pervasive crypto is,
probably doesn't understand his online banking uses it, and so on.
It's tragic.
bleh.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Yosem Companys
