great opportunity for a theorist/digital media producer in our sociology
department. Take a look and write me if interested... Best, Adam Fish
*Lecturer in Critical Digital Media Practice*
*Department of Sociology*
*Salary: *Grade 7-9
*Closing Date: * TBC
*Interview Date: * TBC
*Reference
What blocking we've seen with Lantern also corroborates Collin's
analysis in terms of blocking appearing to be IP enumeration and not
traffic classification. We've also seen increases in blocking on
weekends when perhaps they think we're not watching!
-Adam
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:00 PM
We wrote a blog post about the huge (like, 10x) jump in Psiphon usage in
Brazil when they blocked WhatsApp there a couple of days ago:
https://psiphon.ca/en/blog/brazil-whatsapp-2015.html
--
Adam Pritchard
Psiphon Inc.
--
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violat
?ref=A978
Best,
Adam Fish, PhD
Media and Cultural Studies
Department of Sociology
Lancaster University, UK
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
Greetings LibTech!
Does anyone here know the details of Internet filtering in the
Ukraine? I've heard of keyword filtering, but are sites actually
blocked? If so, do you know which ones?
Many thanks.
-Adam
--
pgp A998 2B6E EF1C 373E 723F A813 045D A255 901A FD89
--
Liberationtech is public
destroyed
2) You don't have to worry about filtering in the same way once you're
in the country
Forgive me for thinking out loud a bit.
-Adam
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Griffin Boyce grif...@cryptolab.net wrote:
Nathan of Guardian wrote:
Github? Maybe not whole sites, but specific files
that further.
See some of you at RightsCon!
-Adam
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nathan of Guardian
nat...@guardianproject.info wrote:
On 02/25/2014 03:41 PM, Adam Pritchard wrote:
One
might not want to suggest that one is unblockable.
One does not simply suggest, that one is unblockable
decide specifically and publicly to target it... One
might not want to suggest that one is unblockable.
--
Adam Pritchard
Psiphon Inc.
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman
adversary.
For strong anonymity, a high latency channel (e.g. anonymous remailers) is
needed.
Adam Midvidy
Twitter: @amidvidy--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo
discussion about it (or about b-money)?
Thanks
Adam
ps please keep me on cc if replying to list
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change
into
promising technology that everyone in the community can scrutinize. I think
the non-technical aspects are where things have the potential to derail,
but I'm hopeful we can all help prevent that.
That's the report from my window on the world.
-Adam
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Jillian C. York
it could be really easy to integrate that into
Tor, but we'd be happy to talk about that more or to help however we can.
Thanks again Roger.
-Adam
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu
technical or messaging related, as that's the only
way we'll improve.
Thanks Shava.
-Adam
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Shava Nerad shav...@gmail.com wrote:
I am with Jill -- and I wish more of the press and sponsors took that
attitude. Lantern has good expectations I think specified
it to the fore. The right time for it seems to be rapidly approaching.
-Adam
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Adam Fisk af...@getlantern.org wrote:
... we really would love to hear any criticisms of Lantern people may
Seems a lot like China no?
Adam
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:10:46PM -0700, coderman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:21 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
... 10,000 news alerts from scores of
filters (everything from TS//SI//NF to Flame OR Gauss OR Duqu OR
Stuxnet to Goldreich–Goldwasser
and supporting the work of the other
researchers. The direct line supervisor will be Dr. Adam Fish (Lancaster),
and you will be based in the Department of Sociology. Informal enquiries
may be made to Dr. Fish at a.fi...@lancaster.ac.uk.
This is a full time fixed-term post beginning 15 October
researchers. The direct line supervisor will be Dr. Adam Fish (Lancaster),
and you will be based in the Department of Sociology. Informal enquiries
may be made to Dr. Fish at a.fi...@lancaster.ac.uk.
This is a full time fixed-term post beginning 15 October, or as soon as
possible after this date
Dear Colleagues,
I am presently writing on politicians, namely Gore and Obama, talking about
the internet on the campaign trail. I am looking for citations for research
on discourses on technology in politics.
Any leads?
Thank you.
Best,
Adam Fish, PhD
Media and Cultural Studies
for comms, and user controlled keys for cloud storage, mixes, ToR
for email and browsing.
Of course you could imagine if push came to shove the Chinese and US
intelligence agencies could trade access to backdoors, or search terms for
their respective backdoor harvests. Maybe they already are.
Adam
browseable from a web browser with the plugin. The whole thing was
a perl script, but you may find the approaches interesting.
http://cypherspace.org/adam/eternity/
There's an old Phrack article describing it in more detail and a howto, and
the software.
Adam
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:12:15PM
to the FISA orders by even offering to
store user keys? Surely thats asking for trouble.
Adam
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:21:49AM -0400, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
The world is still reeling from the leaked details of the NSA's PRISM program,
reported to give the government's top spies access to personal
Congrats guys! I've had a small glimpse into the immense amount of work
that has gone into this and really looking forward to taking it for a spin.
Exciting!
On Thursday, March 21, 2013, Andrew Reynolds wrote:
Thanks James,
The Commotion team is excited about the new developer release of the
Congrats guys! I've had a small glimpse into the immense amount of work
that has gone into this and really looking forward to taking it for a spin.
Exciting!
On Thursday, March 21, 2013, Andrew Reynolds wrote:
Thanks James,
The Commotion team is excited about the new developer release of the
I love this PoC, and I believe it might actually prove useful in certain
situations.
Short-range FM transmission is certainly possible with cheap devices [1]
Modulating the FM signal should be a breeze, I'll try to hack up some code soon.
Awesome project.
[1] -
On Monday, February 25, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Raven Jiang CX wrote:
I think Sterling is suggesting that most people are not cognizant of this
trade-off and that as Facebook does more with your personal information, that
trade-off becomes increasingly disfavourable compared to the relatively
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Nadim Kobeissi na...@nadim.cc wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Adam Fisk af...@bravenewsoftware.org
wrote:
I'm certainly more confident in the overall security of silent circle in
its first release than I was in the overall security of cryptocat
be chosen. You should do lots of other things right too, of course, that
have nothing to do with licensing.
Totally agreed! It can just be overemphasized amongst the list of
factors -- it's a super important one to be sure, but not the only
one.
-Adam
-john
--
John Sullivan | Executive Director
When I say million, I always mean billion...
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Adam Fisk a...@bravenewsoftware.org wrote:
At the risk of getting swept up in this by consciously saying something
unpopular, I want to put my shoulder against the wheel of the open source
process produces more
Distinction should be made between 'classic' military cyber-force buildup (be
it any type of resource), and privatized force. We can be assured, to a certain
degree, that only agents of state (i.e. armies) have access to 'classic'
strategic weapons. The same cannot be said about cyber weapons
On Monday, February 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Stefan Geens wrote:
So, what are our options and the details of the best solutions (using inside
or outside Syria base)?
Cheap FM broadcast is possible [1], but with limited range.
The main goal should be to use disposable, low power, hard-to-detect TX,
it will
be just as open source as Jitsi.
Passing that 10% through Google servers is definitely an issue though, and
that'll be 100% with 3 or more on a call. The alternative is to set up your
own TURN, STUN, and XMPP servers though.
-Adam
On Friday, December 21, 2012, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
Adam
to be the case, Seth. See:
https://developers.google.com/talk/call_signaling#Encryption
--
Adam
pgp A998 2B6E EF1C 373E 723F A813 045D A255 901A FD89
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Adam Fisk a...@littleshoot.org wrote:
I sympathize with your frustration about Google and other companies'
unwillingness to talk about their interception capabilities. In the
particular case of Hangouts, it seems clear that the Hangout data is
encrypted
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Jerzy Łogiewa jerz...@interia.eu wrote:
Supports, but doesn't mean uses for default!
SRTP also supports NULL CIPHER...
Right -- ideally one of us would fire up Wireshark to check the defaults.
-Adam
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password
through the Jitsi code (granted years ago now) was a pretty
frightening experience -- not security-wise but just code wise.
-Adam
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:29 PM, liberationt...@lewman.us wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:52:35 -0800
Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tv wrote:
So I guess
Thanks Martin. Do you know if Google Talk is still accessible (
talk.google.com)?
-Adam
On Friday, November 9, 2012, Martin Johnson wrote:
Today, Nov 9, 2012, http://www.google.com was blocked in China. It's the
first time since we started tracking online censorship in China in February
.
The deadline for abstracts is 1 December 2012. Submit an abstract early to
take advantage of early registration rates, which also end on 1 December.
For more information, please visit the conference website (
www.islanddynamics.org/3idc.html ) or contact the convenor Adam Grydehøj (
agryde
, Adam Hyde
--
--
Adam Hyde
Founder, FLOSS Manuals
Project Manager, Booki
Book Sprint Facilitator
mobile :+ 49 177 4935122
identi.ca : @eset
booki.flossmanuals.net : @adam
http://www.flossmanuals.net
http://www.booki.cc
http://www.booksprints.net
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change
so much enthusiasm to discuss
and (hopefully also) improve the book. Its a community asset and I hope
that it continues to be improved in efforts than can feed into each other.
adam
--
--
Adam Hyde
Founder, FLOSS Manuals
Project Manager, Booki
Book Sprint Facilitator
mobile :+ 49 177
My understanding from former Google China folks is that they will
randomly redirect DNS lookups for google.x domains to baidu, which may
be what you're seeing.
Thanks for all the links and everything everyone -- very helpful!
-Adam
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Marietta Le marie
way?
My understanding is that China just shows a blank page. Is that correct?
Thanks everyone!
-Adam
___
liberationtech mailing list
liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu
Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:
https
41 matches
Mail list logo
