Cool, let the US govt, instead of the Syrian govt, spy on them.
On May 27, 2013 10:40 PM, Gregory Foster gfos...@entersection.org wrote:
An observation, ymmv.
The NYT op-ed is by Chris Finan. He was recently the Director for
Cybersecurity Legislation in Obama's White House:
From: David Farber d...@farber.net
Anyone believe this would actually work?
LETTER
A Digital ‘Safe Haven’ for Syria
Deploying long-distance Wi-Fi technologies along Syria’s borders and in
rebel-held areas would enable Syrian citizens and the opposition to
communicate freely.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013.05.27 10.57, Yosem Companys wrote:
From: *David Farber* d...@farber.net mailto:d...@farber.net
Anyone believe this would actually work?
LETTER A Digital ?Safe Haven? for Syria
Technically? Yes. I and other folks have done the
Yes technically it's not even that hard, but there are various social
and political roadblocks both inside and outside Syria. I still think
it can be pulled off, even with the various stumbling blocks.
Andrew
On May 28, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Eleanor Saitta e...@dymaxion.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: Eleanor Saitta e...@dymaxion.org
To: liberationtech liberationt...@mailman.stanford.edu
Cc: David Farber d...@farber.net, Yosem Companys compa...@stanford.edu
Subject: [liberationtech] A Digital Safe Haven for Syria
Date: Tue, May 28, 2013 4:09
An observation, ymmv.
The NYT op-ed is by Chris Finan. He was recently the Director for
Cybersecurity Legislation in Obama's White House:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/chris-finan/5/a35/19
http://www.netcaucus.org/biography/christopher-finan.shtml
For context, here, Finan analyzes problems
Question: is one of the potential unintended consequences of connecting to a
Cyber Command network from within Syria the effect of making one's router a
part of the battlefield?
I think the practical answer is that an unsanctioned, wide scale comm network
that is outside their control, will
