On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:52:51PM -0700, Seth wrote:
I'm in agreement with pretty much all the points made, but how do
you feel this approach?
1) ALWAYS publish the original source information via
freedom/privacy/dignity respecting services using a name-space (a
DNS
You know, we get it. Some of the people with foil on their heads will never
use twitter or any other social network. You all don't need to tell us why
over and over again. There are reasons why people, even members of this
list, use them. Telling folks how wrong wrong wrong they are over and over
or just use https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/ and twitter won't block you
(for now)
Le 21/06/2014 17:47, Al Jigong Billings a écrit :
You know, we get it. Some of the people with foil on their heads will
never use twitter or any other social network. You all don't need to
tell us why over and
Rich Kulawiec:
Consider: if Twitter is so ready, willing and able to cave in to these
demands, what possible reason is there to think that they won't give in
just as quickly to *other* demands -- like for a data dump on all the
users in a particular country or following particular accounts or
On 6/9/14, Tom Ritter t...@ritter.vg wrote:
Twitter requires an email. My thought would be that logins via Tor and
other anonymity networks need to use 2FA. Either the Code Generator, SMS,
or email-click-a-link. Either that, or require it on first Tor-login, and
flag the account as not
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
It would be nice if Twitter was a bit more intelligent about Tor
usage. I wrote the BulkExitList feature on check.torproject.org for
Wikipedia. They ironically use it to block edits from Tor. Twitter
could use that export of data or a similar one to have a list of all
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Griffin Boyce grif...@cryptolab.net
wrote:
I'd recommend reaching out formally (perhaps to privacy@ ?) and
proposing a whitelist or other special consideration for Tor users. You've
got the name recognition to pull it off and you actually work for Tor. =)
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:39:06AM +0100, Nariman Gharib wrote:
what solution do you have for solve this problem?
Don't use Twitter.
Yes, I'm quite serious. Twitter has clearly stated that they're delighted
to provide censorship-on-demand for any country that asks nicely:
Rick, I think you delete the problem instead of solving it!
On 9 June 2014 11:30, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:39:06AM +0100, Nariman Gharib wrote:
what solution do you have for solve this problem?
Don't use Twitter.
Yes, I'm quite serious. Twitter has
Well..
NOT using Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc. is not an option if you
really want to reach the masses. If it were feasible to keep being
even a minimally effective activist, and not just Yet Another Nano
Protester, it would be too easy.
The question, in my opinion, would then be how to use
Griffin Boyce writes:
I'd recommend reaching out formally (perhaps to privacy@ ?) and
proposing a whitelist or other special consideration for Tor users.
It seems obviously crazy to me for Twitter to prevent people from
accessing it over Tor, both in light of widespread censorship of Twitter
On 9 June 2014 12:06, Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
Griffin Boyce writes:
I'd recommend reaching out formally (perhaps to privacy@ ?) and
proposing a whitelist or other special consideration for Tor users.
It seems obviously crazy to me for Twitter to prevent people from
Seth David Schoen wrote:
It seems obviously crazy to me for Twitter to prevent people from
accessing it over Tor, both in light of widespread censorship of
Twitter
on different networks and in light of governments' attempts to find out
where users of services are connecting from.
Yes,
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0100, Amin Sabeti wrote:
Rick, I think you delete the problem instead of solving it!
I suspect that's because I have a different definition of the problem. ;)
Outsourcing your communications to a so-called social network whose
interests (a) diverge markedly
I'm in agreement with pretty much all the points made, but how do you feel
this approach?
1) ALWAYS publish the original source information via
freedom/privacy/dignity respecting services using a name-space (a DNS
domain,.onion,.gnu,.i2p,namecoin,whatever) that you control.
2) Syndicate
Does enabling 2FA help?
Twitter likely considers some addresses to be 'nasty.' Likely a combo of
automated heuristics based blacklisting, bad actor cidr and ip lists and
manual additions.
Options :
Get twitter to add an exception by way of user accessible setting.
Chain TOR to an unblacklisted
On 06/07/2014 05:39 AM, Nariman Gharib wrote:
Many Tor users inside Iran reported that while they are using
Tor/Orbot for login into Twitter, Twitter blocked their accounts and
forced them to change their password. it happened everyday and every
time you are login to your account.
what
You can see Iranian people are complaining about it on Twitter :)
also because of 'Sanction' Twitter hasn't Iran on it's country lists. so
people can't enable 2FA.
Thanks alot
Nariman
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Nathan of Guardian
nat...@guardianproject.info wrote:
On 06/07/2014 05:39
I've just tried a login to Twitter from the United Kingdom using Tor.
I was asked to verify my Twitter ID, first time I've seen this.
Then I received an email from Twitter with the title
Did you log in to Twitter from somewhere new?
Content is
Hi Keith Fernie,
We noticed that you recently
19 matches
Mail list logo
