Maybe this isn't the end of it.
Greg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/2/05 10:42:48 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This was an assinine protest.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200509/s1470227.htm
well there were certainly some nice looking
The issue of secession is difficult. First, what does it really mean and is it
really necessary? Perhaps, something short of secession is possible as in an
autonomous region. What about the rights of minorities in these areas? (I
remember reading about the Black Panther Party in the late 1960s
revolutionary
ideas, you can turn a disaster into your most important legacy.
Greg Southworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:While the attached is not a
specifically libertarian proposal, there are things in here that libertarians
will like, and I suppose a few that might be problematic. It does
You are correct in that the issue of overpopulation is relative to the
circumstance. If technology is able to assure reasonable access to the means of
a livelihood in a way that is not harmful to others, then the problem of
overpopulation is not so much of a problem. The issue of sustainablity
and
bankers and the government that is artifically creating scarcity and
thus jacking up the price of land, housing, farms etc.--- In
Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, Mary Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Greg Southworth: You cannot postulate the existence of
overpopulation-- you cannot say
the building industry. People
who can find new fuels.Who is working on those problems? Not I. Not
anyone in his right mind. You'd be sued ninety-five ways from sunday if you
did. --and be blamed for being rich and exploitative and selfish as well.
Greg Southworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in nature, plus it would be a good
idea to deflate the egos of politicans enough to let them know they
are the hired help.--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, Greg
Southworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do know there has been a great deal of discussion over social
credit proposals and other
My honest hope would be that many libertarians would choice different places to
promote libertarian solutions to our society, The LP, Republicans, Democrats,
independent organizations, etc. I would start to be frightened if someone like
a Pat Robertson or a James Dobson started to call
Then I recommend you go.
Greg
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd rather live in the worst part of Beirut, than the best part of Texas.
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, Greg Southworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As a Texan, by transplant, I do not share the view that these people
are trouble
Great selection. I plan to review the list and do what I can.
Greg
Mary Lou Seymour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of you who like to see your charity donations used at the
local level with very little admin costs, but didn't know any local
NO charities,
Here's a list of grassroots
Here is a great opportunity for churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples to
step up to the plate and practice serious compassion.
Greg
Eric Dondero Rittberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HOUSTON -- YOU HAVE A PROBLEM
Right now there are hundreds of busses on the highway transporting
refugees
The overpopulation thing is one of those problems which depends on how you
approach it. There were predictions in the late 1970s that said we would all,
or most of us, would be starving to death by now. While irresponsible
breeding can be a problem, the bigger issue is how do distribution
For some reason, Americans do not want to vote for third parties. It does seem
to matter what they have to say--they have been all over the political map--but
only candidacies involving very well known candidates with very positive images
seem to even show up as a blip on the radar screen. I am
I agree that the best bet appears to be the Republican Party. I wish those who
wish to work within the Democratic Party the best. Interestingly, there may be
a window of opportunity with the Dems now due to the generally dismal
performance outside the Northeast, the West Coast and Upper
with the Peacenik approach is that the whole word
thinks we are a bunch of woosies who are not willing to fight for
our lives and our country.
Result, our enemies spill over our borders and destroy us from
within.
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, Greg Southworth [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks, Melissa. My wife would probably frown on it, but I understand single
folks want to find that important other in their lives. Good luck!
Greg
Melissa Lakewood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Libertarian friendly:
Post your intelligent personals. ( moderated - no spam )
Suggestions for how to
Libertarians are not fully respected in the Republican Party--I heard a
Republican pundit refer to libertarians as the flakey wing of the party.
True, Republicans at this point are no where near smaller government and we
should call them on it every time: Borrow and Spend (Republicans)is
Neither has a sterling record. Republicans have at least addressed the idea of
limited government. Once upon a time, they actually believed in limited
government. But when asked how they would address real problems such as
pollution, crime, race relations, etc...they gave us pollution is good
either that or just give up on political
altogether.
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, Greg Southworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Neither has a sterling record. Republicans have at least addressed
the idea of limited government. Once upon a time, they actually
believed in limited government
I am afraid it is going to require a rebuilding of the party from the inside
out. Both parties are unacceptable as they now stand. Sort of like the
alcoholic who says: But I only drink on weekends! In order to do that you
need to have a political strategy to make it happen at national, state,
The only problem I have with that bit of information is that it resembles some
of the old John Birch Society conspiracy theory tidbits. Throw in a few
references to the Rockefellers and Jewish bankers and you have it!
Greg
Rocky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Infowars
Gamble
On 8/4/05, Greg Southworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always thought Pee Wee Herman was no good.
Greg
Rocky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HISTORY TEST
Please pause a moment, reflect, and take the following multiple choice
test. The events are actual cuts from past history
Interesting. I have often thought that libertarians should favor and encourage
the formation of an independant medical research foundation that looks at
evidence-based medicine, a kind of UL for medicine. That might help in the PR
yo-yo of chocolate-causes-cancer, chocolate-cures-cancer.
The stuggle all religions ultimately face is separating culture form the
essence of the religion. Example: Christianity is seen by many in the West as
an example of narrow-minded, bigoted, and rigid views of people and the roles
they should play in society. Go to parts of Asia and Christianity
Ah true. I misspoke.
Greg
Sam Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:02 PM 7/18/2005 -0700, Greg Southworth wrote:
The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) saw himself as taking dictation from on
high. He, then, was writing the Koran as dictated to him by an angel.
Greg
One correction. Muhammad did
. Your history of
the compilation of the New Testament is correct.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:58 am, Greg Southworth wrote:
Also know that the Bible was not even started until about 40+ years
after the Crucifixion. Jesus (Rabbi Yeshua bin Yoseph) wrote nothing we
know of. He was thought
Also know that the Bible was not even started until about 40+ years after the
Crucifixion. Jesus (Rabbi Yeshua bin Yoseph) wrote nothing we know of. He was
thought to be a leader of a group of Jewish mystics called Essenes who were on
the outs with the Jewish establishment. Some think they were
27 matches
Mail list logo
