Paul, I would go back and get the number of the post, and place the
quote of you doing just what you are now denying, but I don't have
an obsession with making you admit your mistakes, this has been for
the purpose explained in the other post from Friday, and I also
don't have any great desire
I said it was a clue, but did not specify to what it was a clue to,
Mark, it seems you have assumed it was a clue that he is wrong, but
that was indeed not what it was a clue to. Read the post I made
before the PS and you might see other options as to what it was a
clue to, and maybee its not
I am not frustrated with you Paul, I am frustrated was frustrated
with Terry at times though.
I think your biggest error has been failing to notice that I have
never tried to say you are wrong Paul, and I have never provided an
alternative to your point of view. You have failed to press me for
While schollarly writting pertaining to Libertarian philosophy and
Libertarian movement are not the intended content of LPN, in reading
the mentioned policy manual one can see (c) those discussing the
tactics and strategy of Party political activities.
Now, the sholastic portion of this
Rational Review News Digest
--
Published Monday-Friday, except for holidays
Made possible by the generous support of our readers
http://www.rationalreview.com/news
Produced in cooperation with
the International Society for
'When people have friends and customers in other lands, they take a dim view of
their govt dropping bombs on them'
-Terry Liberty Parker
Internet helps musicians spread their word
2/27/2006 11:10 AM
By: Reagan Hackleman
Symposium at St. John's this Friday, March 3, 2006. Click here for the
symposium brochure
http://www.stjohns.edu/media/3/892d4756f52a4b4396e04a77fe5cbdfc.pdf in
PDF form.
Symposium papers will be published this spring in a 20^th anniversary
issue of the /St. John's// Journal of Legal
Actually, the UAE Government is a private company owned by the families
that run the different Emirates. The Emirates themselves are technically
private estates. Citizens are such just because the royal families allow
them to hang out, not because they own anything or have any rights over
the
Steven, I don't think that my points about North Korea and Iran
running our Airports were silly. That's the logical extension of
your argument. Sure, the UAE is no Iran. But if you can bend the
rules for a mixed-bag country like the UAE - mixed at best btw, why
not all the way?
--- In
How about allowing private companies to run the airports? As long as
they do it safely and efficiently, I don't see how it matters if
they're from North Korea, Cuba, Iran, or any other nation. Those who
provide the best service at the best price do it.
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, Eric
Up until this weekend, there 2 possible ways to make this happen.
1. Getting Libertarian Party members elected to all levels of
government and getting them into the Supreme Court.
2. Violent and bloody revolution.
Sadly, option one had the door closed on it this weekend when a
Paul,
What about jury nullification as a third option?
-Mark
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
not guilty based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then how do you propose to take from people what is theirs by the
right of property?
I don't.
On this point you are very very very wrong. This a personal
property issue. It has everything to do with property rights. The
claim
If you claim that I need to prove that Americans own and control the
borders of America, you deny the sovereignty of America and are
unreasonable. I don't have to prove it. Look at a map and prove it
to yourself. We own the borders. If you want to bring your foreign
goods across our borders,
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The right to property is an absolute right. I can move my property
where I own or have secured the right of way. If I own the property,
then I own the right of way. If you come on to my property and
interfere with the movement of
You do not have a logical argument. In fact your argument is
illogical, and completely untenable. I've have presented thoughtful,
intelligent, well-reasoned, and cohent arguments backed by facts and
libertarian philosophy. Your claims have amounted to shouting Nuh uh!
You have repeated your
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mark robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a fascinating thread. I'm torn.
I occasionally attend auction-barn auctions. There are rules for
the audience of potential bidders. One is that no one but the
auctioneer is
Borders are irrelevant? You are digging a deeper and deeper hole and
you're never going to get out. Your right to property does not
entitle you to sell it on the property of another person. Borders
absolutely do matter, whether or not you own the property does not.
Your claims are as
Your question was, How, in a Libertarian Society, is it not an
initiation of force to mandate a seller to charge, and a buyer to pay,
to the goverment, a Tax on the sale of those goods?
First, there is no initiation of force to mandate a buyer to pay a tax
on the sale of goods. They can avoid
Juries don't get to nullify unconstitutional decisions of the Supreme
Court.
--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, mark robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
What about jury nullification as a third option?
-Mark
{American jurors have complete
Since you seem to be a fan of word games, I'll go along.
You said that I proved that I'm not in favor of initiating force but
not of using limited force. Ok, that's fine with me. Libertarians
are in favor of using force (including deadly force) against those who
use force against us.
You have
Hi Boyd,
What do we do? We run for office, and if we can't do that, we help each
other get elected!
We support those that are at least moving in the right direction.
I understand that we can debate whether a 3% import tarrif is
'initiation of force' or not, but let's agree we are all on the
An informed juror can not directly nullify legislation or
decisions. But he/she can indirectly. If defendants keep getting
off via mistrials, prosecutors will eventually stop
prosecuting/enforcing those kinds of cases - the laws in effect,
nullified.
But.
Maybe you are right about SC
Over the years, the LP has had one thing that made it better than all
other parties. It's the one thing that made it stand out, and which
made it the only viable option for making peaceful change in America
and that thing is our libertarian principles.
Last weekend those principles were sold
This is the answer I hoped to see from you Paul, thank you for finally
answering my question rather than dodging it.
The legitimate role of government includes protecting people and
businesses from fraud, theft, coercion, etc. in the markets. This
protection comes at a price. That price can
25 matches
Mail list logo
