I found the bug in OO that there is the same problem as my:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92625
I check the document.xml and the image define the same:
w:object w:dxaOrig=11187 w:dyaOrig=6916
−
v:shape id=_x_i1029 type=#_x_t75
style=width:324.75pt;height:197.25pt o:ole=
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:26:43 +0200, Niko Rönkkö ron...@iki.fi wrote:
Renamed all extensions to --with-ext-*
Thanks, that makes sense, I just didn't get to it. I'd just still argue
for --enable rather than --with.
If we do want to present them together in ./configure --help,
then they all
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:54:20PM +0100, Gert Faller wrote:
Hi,
here are some in 'libs-core'.
Regards.
Thanks! I removed some changes
* in BasicManager::SetGlobalUNOConstant, because the variable is function
parameter, not a string constant.
* in ModuleContainer_Impl::getByName,
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:24:04 +, Wols Lists wrote:
+ --with-java Build LibO with a JDK Java support.],
So, what should be the default? Including Java? Then I would argue for
making this a --without option and having Java enabled by default... ?
pgppmfCzt4N2n.pgp
Description:
For such a cloned repository, will push be possible? Or is this then a
read-only repository?
Thanks, Oli
On 11/03/10 18:20, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:10:14PM +0100, Florian
Effenbergerflo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
I'm no git expert, but if someone comes up with
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:52:19AM +0100, Marc-Oliver Straub
openoff...@sb-software.de wrote:
For such a cloned repository, will push be possible? Or is this then a
read-only repository?
It's read-only. It's possible to make it writable, but I guess nobody
wants to script a hook that would
Hi Mattias,
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 10:38 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
There isn't a bug report in the LO tracker, but there are quite a few
in the OO.o issue tracker. The basic issue number is 89042, with
97116, 102270, 107241, 113375, and 108072 marked as duplicates.
Hum, I saw that one...
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:34:27PM +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Java source codes in tests of LO/OOo use the annotation feature of JUnit 4,
imported with namespace org.junit.*, which JUnit 3.x lacks. So its version
is worth checking out.
Yes, but they are unreliable anyway, so even me who
On 05/11/10 10:28, Regina Henschel wrote:
It is not about using my seamonkey, but why this list is organized
different than others. For example in disc...@documentfoundation.org
(and in all other mailing list I am subscribed, but
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org) when I click on Antworten
---
configure.in | 15 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index aab3995..6f72931 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -4368,11 +4368,16 @@ if test -n $with_system_db -o -n $with_system_libs
\
test
A little bit more explanation:
On OpenBSD there is a db.h in /usr/include which is not sleepycat db4,
and of course it gets picked up and the compile test fails.
On (2010-11-05 12:22), Robert Nagy wrote:
---
configure.in | 15 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5
On 5 November 2010 20:16, Cedric Bosdonnat cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr wrote:
Hi Mattias,
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 10:38 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
There isn't a bug report in the LO tracker, but there are quite a few
in the OO.o issue tracker. The basic issue number is 89042, with
97116,
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:28:24 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
It is not about using my seamonkey, but why this list is organized
different than others.
It's a religious thing. Some belief that the list should set a reply-to
to itself while others don't want the list to monkey around with the
Hi
I'd personally not give the freedom to the user to pick whatever
sleepycat db they want to use, just make a dependency for one only
and check for that.
On (2010-11-05 15:11), Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
Hi Robert,
you may have a look at what we do for Gentoo Linux, where we have
the
Hi all,
I tried to install the LibO-SDK as generated in my build from master,
and I noted that has some link/mingling with OOo.
there are two small issue:
1) When I try to create the working environment in GNU/Linux, it
defaults to use the OOo 3 program installation.
I can manually change
Hi there,
Just to let you guys know that, I've merged the
feature/calc-function-linest-logest branch into master. That branch
contained the patch from Regina (CC'ed) that improves accuracy of
LINEST, LOGEST, TREND and GROWTH cell functions. I've done my review,
and think it's in a good state.
Just (yet again :-) done a completely fresh download of libreoffice,
type make, and I get the following fail :-(
I'll investigate further, but has somebody just committed a change and
broken it?
Cheers,
Wol
Entering /home/anthony/gitstuff/loffice/rawbuild/sal/cpprt
Making:
-d is not needed for gunzip because it will do a decompress
anyways and -d is not available in every gunzip implementation
---
packimages/pack/makefile.mk |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/packimages/pack/makefile.mk b/packimages/pack/makefile.mk
index
wiz, does this work on NetBSD? It does on OpenBSD,
so i would like to push it.
thanks
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
It's also possible to replace gunzip by gzip like the other lines of
this file :
# unpack the Crystal icon set
$(MISC)$/crystal.flag : $(CRYSTAL_TARBALL)
cd $(MISC) gzip -d -c $(CRYSTAL_TARBALL) | ( tar -xf - )
$(TOUCH) $(@:f)
# unpack the Oxygen icon set
$(MISC)$/oxygen.flag :
Wols Lists wrote:
Just (yet again :-) done a completely fresh download of libreoffice,
type make, and I get the following fail :-(
I'll investigate further, but has somebody just committed a change and
broken it?
...
Entering /home/anthony/gitstuff/loffice/rawbuild/sal/cppunittester
On 05/11/10 20:44, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
Wols Lists wrote:
Just (yet again :-) done a completely fresh download of libreoffice,
type make, and I get the following fail :-(
I'll investigate further, but has somebody just committed a change and
broken it?
...
Entering
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:10 +, Wols Lists wrote:
Just doing an emerge cppunit.
It shouldn't be necessary to use system cppunit, cppunit should be built
as part of the build.
So, lets just document debugging this...
sal/cppunittester/makefile.mk has
APP1STDLIBS = $(CPPUNITLIB) $(SALLIB)
Renamed all extensions to --enable-ext-* because
we do want to present them together in ./configure --help
Deprecated old options not removed but commented instead.
Fixed: --without-java (from Wol)
---
configure.in | 296
--
1 files
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:01:09PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
wiz, does this work on NetBSD? It does on OpenBSD,
so i would like to push it.
Sorry for the delay, but I was still building.
The patch improves the situation on NetBSD as well, so please push it.
Thomas
Pushed, thanks!
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
just wondering if someone knows why there are duplicate ids in
'writer/sw/inc/cmdid.h'
(FN_FORMAT + 129) , (FN_FORMAT + 130), (FN_FORMAT + 131) at line 537.
Regards.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hello,
Here is a patch for calc\sc\source\filter
Hope i haven't made mistakes, there are 1 or 2 places where i hesitated.
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
Julien.
RTL_calc_sc_source_filter.txt.bz2
Description: application/bzip
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi all,
Ok, after getting over a short-term dislike of Word Count - with a new found
appreciation for some of the developer comments in OOo issuezilla - I had a
new idea for a test plan. Perhaps turning on the Scanner clipping has
*accidentally* fixed the quote problem as well. Although I
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:36:40PM +, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:10 +, Wols Lists wrote:
Just doing an emerge cppunit.
It shouldn't be necessary to use system cppunit, cppunit should be built
as part of the build.
So, lets just document
On 6 November 2010 12:13, John LeMoyne Castle j...@mail2lee.com wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, after getting over a short-term dislike of Word Count - with a new found
appreciation for some of the developer comments in OOo issuezilla - I had a
new idea for a test plan. Perhaps turning on the Scanner
31 matches
Mail list logo
