Re: [Libreoffice] Number of days for testing RC

2010-12-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 10/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: OOo has only 5 days, see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Release_criteria#Stopper_issues How is it there with building and approving the national builds? As shown in the page you link, it's 5 days including a weekend, so the constraints proposed by

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 11/12/2010 10:01, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit : Le 06/12/2010 17:04, Jan Holesovsky a écrit : Hi, I am sorry - I promised the LibO online help (WikiHelp) already the last week, but it haven't happened; it needed more work than anticipated :-( Either way, the good news is that I am

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-11 at 14:35 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: I have heard quite some complaints about the missing native language versions already; I am not sure I've explained it well enough previously, but this testing is blocking it. So please - help me :-) I've search for your

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Jean-Baptiste, On 2010-12-11 at 10:01 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: I can't find any wiki page which explain this project. Does such web-page exists ? If not, I think such should be created as a reference. Good idea, I've created it now based on the mail to Sophie; and sorry that I

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Jean-Baptiste, On 2010-12-13 at 11:02 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: What about security ? How can you protect WikiHelp against vandalism and spam if everybody is allowed to update this on-line help ? It seems it is not so easy if you consider the wiki of OOo. So far the accounts are

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I have one suggestion and I have seen this on the Ubuntu wiki. When any editing is done on a page its emailed to a team, in this case the wiki team, and they check it for formatting so its consistent as well as the content. On 12/13/2010 11:46 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Jean-Baptiste, On

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation on sc

2010-12-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:32 +, Michael Meeks wrote: On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 13:57 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: So at least we can get the name of the missing symbol .. There's some broken dependency somewhere and something isn't getting rebuilt. FWIW it *might* be a .a, if an .a is

Re: [Libreoffice] drag-fill in autofiltered bugs

2010-12-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Michael Meeks wrote: On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 18:56 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote: I'm looking at a very old bug in openoffice that irritated me a lot: Drag-filling in an autofiltered list also fills hidden cells http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89232 Oh - this might

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-12-13 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, ah, I have somehow missed this mail. Sophie Gautier píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 20:49 +0300: Hi Andrea, all, On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria Feel free to update it or propose improvements.

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp discussion

2010-12-13 Thread David Nelson
Hi Michael, :-) On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 18:24, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:        So - there is no need to open the wiki for editing ever, if that is a huge problem for people, and certainly we don't have to do this for 3.3, and certainly we don't have to open the wiki so

Re: [Libreoffice] De-Java-ise flat XML export

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Peter, On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 17:20 +0100, Peter Jentsch wrote: I'll have a look at libxslt and try to add support for libxslt to XSLTFilter.cxx. I the long run I guess it'll be desirable to let XSLT filter components tell XSLTFilter wether they want saxon9 / XSLT2.0 or not using an

[Libreoffice] Hello

2010-12-13 Thread C. Toure
Hello Please permit me to express certain personal issues I do not know if I might receive helps from you of course my subject might appear so sudden but please consider this as a wish and accept my mail with a deep sense of humility I lost my father about some months ago; I and my sister are

[Libreoffice] Finish removing unhelpful File.hxx macros

2010-12-13 Thread Andy Holder
Last two patches to remove these macros. AndyFrom d754de30bcc8ed04bfce96336be71b0e710a8765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Holder andy.m.hol...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:51:41 + Subject: [PATCH] Change unnamespaced file.hxx macros --- l10ntools/source/help/HelpLinker.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] Base - sqlite - licence grief

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 12:27 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: So you see, it might not be entirely hopeless after all. Oh - exactly ! :-) and it would be good to remove that hostile junk header with apparent Sun ownership claim anyway. Good stuff. So - please do poke him

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp discussion

2010-12-13 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Michael, On 13/12/2010 13:24, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Sophie all, On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 14:35 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: I've search for your explanation on our list but didn't find them. Currently we (the localizer team) do not want the localized help to be uploaded on the wiki until we

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp discussion

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 18:57 +0800, David Nelson wrote: Personally, I like the idea of editing the help on the wiki rather than offline. But could the problem be solved by creating a user group on the wiki and only allowing editing rights for that group's users? Then we could add selected

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation on sc

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:32 +, Michael Meeks wrote: On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 13:57 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: So at least we can get the name of the missing symbol ... There's some broken dependency somewhere and something isn't getting rebuilt. It turns out this was:

Re: [Libreoffice] pdf import extention

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thorsten, On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 12:57 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Lior Kaplan wrote: Could we import changes made in the PDF import extension ? See http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/pdfextfix04 Yep, makes sense - if someone could second this, I'll commit it to -3-3.

[Libreoffice] [Really Pushed] Remove duplicate placeholder icons

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 18:49 +0100, Joachim wrote: Here is a patch that removes the placeholder icons in default_images/res. Great - I pushed it :-) There are still such icons in ooo_custom_images, I'll send a patch later. Really ? I'd not expect to see them there;

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp discussion

2010-12-13 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Regardless if its spam posting or editing of a pages its all moderated so if there is spam its automatically denied. also they have it to where you have to have a login to be able to do any editing. CAPTCHA can also help mitigate spam and bots when users sign up to be able to do any editing of

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi Kendy, Le 13/12/2010 11:37, Jan Holesovsky a écrit : Hi Jean-Baptiste, On 2010-12-11 at 10:01 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: I can't find any wiki page which explain this project. Does such web-page exists ? If not, I think such should be created as a reference. Good idea, I've

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-13 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-13 at 14:05 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: I have subscribed to the l10n mailing list just on Friday, after I learned that there were some discussions there I was not aware of until then. This is the list for the people doing the work you're currently removing, so

Re: [Libreoffice] Number of days for testing RC

2010-12-13 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Jean-Baptiste, Jean-Baptiste Faure píše v Pá 10. 12. 2010 v 20:02 +0100: Hi Petr, all, Le 10/12/2010 15:24, Petr Mladek a écrit : Hi, Jean has modified http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria and increased the number of days for reporting blocker bugs from 7 to 10.

[Libreoffice] Thoughts on releasing ...

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 20:49 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote: So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions. Right. I do not believe we can

Re: [Libreoffice] Base - sqlite - licence grief

2010-12-13 Thread Wols Lists
On 13/12/10 11:34, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 12:27 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: So you see, it might not be entirely hopeless after all. Oh - exactly ! :-) and it would be good to remove that hostile junk header with apparent Sun ownership claim anyway. Good stuff.

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:45 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: These are all valid solutions, but they will not help for the quality of the first (3.3) release, which will be rather important. Maybe a solution for the Microsoft Windows package could be to put in the smaller multi-language

Re: [Libreoffice] Number of days for testing RC

2010-12-13 Thread Petr Mladek
Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 12. 12. 2010 v 19:30 +0100: On 10/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: OOo has only 5 days, see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Release_criteria#Stopper_issues How is it there with building and approving the national builds? As shown in the page you link, it's 5

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp discussion

2010-12-13 Thread Wols Lists
On 13/12/10 10:57, David Nelson wrote: Personally, I like the idea of editing the help on the wiki rather than offline. But could the problem be solved by creating a user group on the wiki and only allowing editing rights for that group's users? Then we could add selected devs, i10n and

Re: [Libreoffice] Number of days for testing RC

2010-12-13 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Petr, Just jumping to the last part about tests, On 13/12/2010 17:04, Petr Mladek wrote: [...] Just to get better picture. How much time would you need to finish all known manual tests? You may not know but I've translated (from our German friends) some tests for 3.3 QA here:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] nuke obsolete use of String

2010-12-13 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi Caolán, On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:05:38 +, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: This is good stuff, I didn't push this yet though. There's one little easily-fixed snag I think, e.g. - else if ( aArgStr.CompareToAscii( -psn, 4 ) == COMPARE_EQUAL ) + else if (

Re: [Libreoffice] Base - sqlite - licence grief

2010-12-13 Thread Wols Lists
On 13/12/10 14:17, Alexander Thurgood wrote: I've seen a couple of things about sqlite *2* that implies it's not a particularly friendly database. 3 may well be an improvement. But anyways, once we've got sqlite in place I'm then going to try and write an engine for LO. That'll be a

[Libreoffice] [Windows] Executable name and file association

2010-12-13 Thread plino
Renaming the executables from s*.exe to l*.exe has been discussed and apart from the differentiation of office suites it has a practical implication for Windows users: An extension (e.g. ods) is associated with an exe file (e.g. scalc.exe). If the user has installed OpenOffice AND LibreOffice,

Re: [Libreoffice] Can we remove soldep module?

2010-12-13 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:13 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 22:50 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:49:37PM +, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: I think its a tool that fs built to get a graphical view of module dependencies ?. But it

Re: [Libreoffice] Can we remove soldep module?

2010-12-13 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:33 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:31 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: I'll work on removing this module later today. Remove it from the solenv/unx/*.mk list of modules with warnings that should be ignored while you're at it. Roger that. --

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] nuke obsolete use of String

2010-12-13 Thread Wols Lists
On 13/12/10 14:52, Takeshi Abe wrote: p.s. I think we should have a wiki page to list the old String methods and the new OUString equivalents side-by-side with snags listed. (Some of the String methods are sort of OUStringBuffer equivalents, and some are hard to do with OUStrings, and might

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

2010-12-13 Thread Petr Mladek
Andrea Pescetti píše v So 11. 12. 2010 v 11:45 +0100: On 06/12/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: Andrea Pescetti píše v Ne 05. 12. 2010 v 18:39 +0100: So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process would be that no explicit approval is needed for localized versions. ... I

[Libreoffice] UX Easy Hack (ex.Grey as default color for native tables in Impress)

2010-12-13 Thread Camille Moulin
Hi All, Any chance that someone could have a look at that? Thanks, Camille On 10/12/2010 23:10, camille wrote: Dear LibO devs, Please find attached a tentative patch for my own Easy Hack described below. The problem : Default color for native tables in Impress is blue. Most people I

[Libreoffice] what's SfxMenuControl::aHelpText good for?

2010-12-13 Thread David Tardon
Hi all, recently I've been looking at fdo#31716 and have found out that the reading of help indexes that seems to cause the slowdown serves to no purpose, because the result is then just ignored. To be more precise, the result is assigned (through SfxMenuControl::Bind) to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Grey as default color for native tables in Impress

2010-12-13 Thread Thorsten Behrens
camille wrote: Please find attached a tentative patch for my own Easy Hack described below. Thanks camille, looks good is a sensible approach. Committed to -3-3. Keep the patches coming! :) Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpd77dGGctLp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Libreoffice] Feature list for upcoming version

2010-12-13 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Marc Paré wrote: I'm helping out with the Features list for the upcoming LibreOffice v. 3.3 as found on this page: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/LibOReleaseEvents/LOPressKit/FeatureList3.3 . Sophie was kind enough to help with the initial list. Is there a place where a list of

Re: [Libreoffice] Feature list for upcoming version

2010-12-13 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-13 14:34, Thorsten Behrens a écrit : Marc Paré wrote: I'm helping out with the Features list for the upcoming LibreOffice v. 3.3 as found on this page: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/LibOReleaseEvents/LOPressKit/FeatureList3.3 . Sophie was kind enough to help with the

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for testtools

2010-12-13 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Here's a patch for testtools Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) commit 454a035958ee250cfc302967d5e936e0c634e746 Author: serval ser...@ilapharm.com Date: Mon Dec 13 21:36:13 2010 +0100 RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for testtools diff --git a/testtools/source/bridgetest/multi.hxx

[Libreoffice] vcl: cppcheck cleanup.

2010-12-13 Thread Joachim Trémouroux
Hi, Here are some various cppcheck cleanup in vcl. Incidentally, while checking for one ccpcheck warning I have found a duplicate definition and implementation of two classes: PspSalInfoPrinter and PspSalPrinter are defined both in vcl/unx/inc/salprn.h and vcl/unx/headless/svpprn.hxx The

Re: [Libreoffice] vcl: cppcheck cleanup.

2010-12-13 Thread Joachim Trémouroux
With the patch it's better... Le 13 décembre 2010 21:41, Joachim Trémouroux joachim.tremour...@gmail.coma écrit : Hi, Here are some various cppcheck cleanup in vcl. Incidentally, while checking for one ccpcheck warning I have found a duplicate definition and implementation of two classes:

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Finish removing unhelpful File.hxx macros

2010-12-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:10 +, Andy Holder wrote: Last two patches to remove these macros. Looks good, pushed. Thanks for this. Is that the last use of those macros ?, is so you can move it from the Easy Hacks to the completed section on the wiki. C.

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] nuke obsolete use of String

2010-12-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 23:52 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: So I amend my patch as attached Looks good to me, pushed, thanks for this. Nice to see some UniStrings and ByteStrings bite the dust. As an aside, there is plenty of code that started off with char*, got changed to String which was then the

Re: [Libreoffice] De-Java-ise flat XML export

2010-12-13 Thread Peter Jentsch
Hi Gioele, I got the message that xslt processing should be done by libxml/libxslt not by xalan. Because I'm new to libxml, I first need to have closer look at libxslts transformation API (and how to use that from LO, which brings it's own xml processing API). Currently it looks as if it could

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] sw build fix because of missed declaration update.

2010-12-13 Thread Octavio Alvarez
While trying to build LibreOffice for the first time I found out doccomp.cxx didn't compile. Looks like a recent patch intended to change a function definition but forgot to adjust the declaration. It's a simple patch. The file now compiles. Octavio Alvarez (1): sw: doccomp.cxx type mismatch

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] sw: doccomp.cxx type mismatch build fix on SetIndex

2010-12-13 Thread Octavio Alvarez
Commit 84a19491 broke sw build by forgetting to change ULONG to size_t on ::SetIndex, as it appears from the rest of the diff. --- sw/source/core/doc/doccomp.cxx |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/doccomp.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] vcl: cppcheck cleanup.

2010-12-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:41 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: Hi, Here are some various cppcheck cleanup in vcl. Incidentally, while checking for one ccpcheck warning I have found a duplicate definition and implementation of two classes: PspSalInfoPrinter and PspSalPrinter are defined both

[Libreoffice] Patch for ignoring preceding and trailing spaces in cell during csv import

2010-12-13 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi there, I'd like to port a patch to the libreoffice-3-3 branch to ignore preceding and trailing spaces in cells during csv import. The change is already committed on master, and the attached is the total difference against the current libreoffice-3-3 branch. The change on master consists of

Re: [Libreoffice] De-Java-ise flat XML export

2010-12-13 Thread Peter Jentsch
Hi Michael, I'm from Germany, where XSLT at least currently is slightly more popular than COBOL. http://www.google.com/trends?q=COBOL%2C +XSLTctab=0geo=degeor=alldate=allsort=0 I guess you're right about XSLT 2.0 being at bit underdetermined though. Cheers, Peter Am Montag, den

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: vcl: cppcheck cleanup.

2010-12-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:42 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: With the patch it's better... Looks good. Mostly the scoping ones and assigned but unused warnings, as far as I can see. Pushed now, thanks for this. Just watch out for some of the cppcheck warnings, a few here and there are false

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] sw: doccomp.cxx type mismatch build fix on SetIndex

2010-12-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 13:14 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: Commit 84a19491 broke sw build by forgetting to change ULONG to size_t on ::SetIndex, as it appears from the rest of the diff. That's the right fix, but Joseph Powers bet you to the punch and committed his equivalent fix already :-) C.

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [Patch] call-catcher / bloat removal in ScCellRangesBase

2010-12-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:09 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with ScCellRangesBase of sc. Compiling sc was ok. Yup, agreed, pushed this. Thanks, another small step towards smaller binaries and less code to maintain :-) C.

Re: [Libreoffice] De-Java-ise flat XML export

2010-12-13 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:30:50 +0100, Peter Jentsch pj...@guineapics.de wrote: Hi Michael, I'm from Germany, where XSLT at least currently is slightly more popular than COBOL. But compared to, say, python, both are just background noise :)

Re: [Libreoffice] Help?

2010-12-13 Thread Jerry Shi
Alright, thanks for all the help so far. To answer your questions, I'm using openSuse 11.2, on a fairly new dual core laptop. Um...about the dependencies...I went to the repository for openSuse and installed both build and bootstrap, but I'm not quite sure that was the right thing to do, which

Re: [Libreoffice] Help?

2010-12-13 Thread Jerry Shi
Nevermind that bit about it not existing. I forgot built-in libraries. I'm still not sure why the assert would fail though... On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jerry Shi shij...@gmail.com wrote: Alright, thanks for all the help so far. To answer your questions, I'm using openSuse 11.2, on a

Re: [Libreoffice] Help?

2010-12-13 Thread Jerry Shi
Alright, so I just got off of irc.freenode.net, and now have another question. For some odd reason, make fetch does not work. It gives me an error, make: nothing to be done for 'fetch', which stumped the person I was chatting with. Any ideas? On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jerry Shi

Re: [Libreoffice] Help?

2010-12-13 Thread Jerry Shi
nevermind, being pretty stupid now...Disregard the last email. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Jerry Shi shij...@gmail.com wrote: Alright, so I just got off of irc.freenode.net, and now have another question. For some odd reason, make fetch does not work. It gives me an error, make:

Re: [Libreoffice] Help?

2010-12-13 Thread Jerry Shi
So, just one more thing before I go do something else...is it fine if I exclude modules? I got around the nss thing by disabling it when I was running ./autogen.sh. Now, I have an error in graphite where CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set I do have a 64 bit computer, as I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

2010-12-13 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Joost, On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:19 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: Hereby additional patch with: * Check on pName is NULL. * Showing original sheet name in input box, when Rename option is checked. Not implemented: OrgName_#. Ok. I've finished my review followup work to give it a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

2010-12-13 Thread Andy Brown
On Mon Dec 13 2010 20:53:22 GMT-0800 (PST) Kohei Yoshida wrote: Hi Joost, On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:19 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: Hereby additional patch with: * Check on pName is NULL. * Showing original sheet name in input box, when Rename option is checked. Not implemented:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] EasyHacks 3.27 Change Sheet copy process

2010-12-13 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 23:53 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Hi Joost, On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 12:19 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: Hereby additional patch with: * Check on pName is NULL. * Showing original sheet name in input box, when Rename option is checked. Not implemented:

Re: [Libreoffice] ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making sysui/util and helpcontent2/source/auxiliary

2010-12-13 Thread imacat
Caolán McNamara said: On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 21:32 +0800, imacat wrote: Hmm, it would seem so. What I would suggest, is to remove that empty clone/l10n dir. In a fresh shell do the ./autogen.sh --with=languages again and ./download steps again and see if that l10n dir is created again, but

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST(TOXControlList, Control*)

2010-12-13 Thread Joseph Powers
I found where this code is used: Writer - Insert - Indexes and Tables - Indexes and Tables - Entries. Currently I can't build due to a non-related issue so I can't trouble shoot it. My git foo is also bad enough that I can't figure out how to remove it... Needless to say, my patch causes a

[Libreoffice] Help file discussion

2010-12-13 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all, I've put some reflexions on how to handle the help files taking into account each team needs on the discussion page opened by Kendy yesterday [1]. The proposal I made is to handle the en_US file on the wiki to let the documentation team take care of it and remove the hurdle of