[Libreoffice] Fail to open LO form USB thumb

2011-02-14 Thread FreeSMGU
I try to open OS X LibreOffice 3.3.0 from my USB thumb but I get this error: 14/02/11 09.06.07 com.apple.launchd.peruser.502[230] ([0x0-0x161161].org.libreoffice.script[4389]) Exited with exit code: 77 This also mean that OS X Portable LO can't work. Is there a way to solve it?

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-14 Thread David Tardon
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:26:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: caolanm-dtardon: Which reminds me, when i did this I didn't seem to get the python, beanshell, rhino scripting extensions (not that I really want the beanshell, rhino ones, but I did want the python one) I probably forgot to add

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Hacks: Migrate module descriptions to our wiki

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christoph, On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 21:45 +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote: I'm busy with this easy hack, i.e. filling http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Code_Overview. Wonderful :-) It is proposed to copy and paste text from

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3

2011-02-14 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello Miklos, The patches looks ok to me. I'ld say ok for 3.3.1. -- Cedric On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 17:35 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: Hi, This commit in master: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=a37fae128b4badc8f9f2201e28dca3e08948ddec Fixes:

Re: [Libreoffice] duplicate code (binfilter)

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christina, On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 21:07 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: binfilter/bf_svtools/source/config/svt_menuoptions.cxx and svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx So - as Tor says, binfilter is substantially duplicate code, and code that is dying fast - we have a hero

Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation faults in unit tests

2011-02-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 08:17 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: /bootstrap/clone/impress/sd/qa/unit/../../unxdflyx3.pro/misc/qa_unit : [1] + 21339 suspended (tty output) time gmake I have to type fg by hand in the shell to let the process continue. That's a nuisance, doesn't happen on Linux,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] DECLARE_LIST(TOXControlList, Control*) to std::vectorControl* in sw.

2011-02-14 Thread David Tardon
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:40:17PM +, Rafael Dominguez wrote: Well the patch is related to sw, tab entries in Insert-Indexes and Tables - Indexes and Tables. Looks good on a glance, but lifetime of the ptrs seem to be bound to that of the container, so I suggest using boost::ptr_vector

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [Patch] Small bug fixes for SVG import

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote: Here are some tiny patches to fix bugs in SVG import. Excellent, all pushed - thanks for your great work!! Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpnf2Uedt0MB.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] Segfault in regcomp while creating registry

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Enrico, On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 16:49 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: big_snip / .. could someone please help me to understand what that registry is all about ? The term reminds me to the Windows registry Haha ;-) perhaps the comparison is apt. the registry code stores information about

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove legacy Addin functions from calc

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Alfonso, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:19 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: /* #i54546# The code belonging to this resource file is sample code for the * legacy AddIn interface. The interface is still supported, but deprecated. * The strings here were displayed in the function wizard. We

Re: [Libreoffice] Segfault in regcomp while creating registry

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Enrico Weigelt wrote: could someone please help me to understand what that registry is all about ? The term reminds me to the Windows registry, which essentially is a poor-man's ldap (w/o schemata) and nothing a simple filesystem can't do ;-o Yes. And with a lot of subtleties, and possibly

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove legacy Addin functions from calc

2011-02-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 10:13 +, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Alfonso, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:19 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: /* #i54546# The code belonging to this resource file is sample code for the * legacy AddIn interface. The interface is still supported, but deprecated. * The

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: Branch 'libreoffice-3-3' - starmath/source

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Kevin Hunter wrote: The perhaps more direct question is, beyond you and me, would others *committing developers* appreciate having a commit message guideline? Something along the lines of what you have just proposed? I'd personally like to have one, at some prominent place in the wiki, to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] use BrOffice name if the Brazilian UI translation is used (bnc#33744)

2011-02-14 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 22:54 +0100: Hi, the BrOffice name was not in sync with the used UI localization. The attached patch helped to solve it. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33744#c12 for more details. I need review from 2 more people to include it into

Re: [Libreoffice] Issues building LO on Linux prior to attempting on Android

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Andrew Wafaa wrote: I'm trying to build LO on openSUSE 11.3, but get a failure with make. The steps I've taken are: Hi Andrew, um, looks like a bigger cock-up - can you re-do that, pipe all the make output to a file, and make that available somewhere? Or ideally, come to irc let's work it

Re: [Libreoffice] Problems with windows build

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 06:41 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote: And after a while of dismissing these, saxparser goes into an infinite loop. For me, saxparser crashes... I am debugging that but not really getting much .. iterator i is iterating so that i points to some bogus data and

Re: [Libreoffice] l10n of patches

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Andras Timar wrote: Please decide if these patches should be integrated or deleted. Otherwise it will be hard to localize the strings in them. I'll put mine in - the optional-outplace-ole prolly conditionally-compiled, or as experimental feature. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpnr1zhSIjsy.pgp

[Libreoffice] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Bálint Dózsa
Hy, I have removed some dead code (0002-Remove-dead-code.patch), and one unused method (0001-Remove-unused-method-GetListTable.patch). Regards, Balint Dozsa From ade4725bd494c9c8bf01a94cb4b16b8b8baac282 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?B=C3=A1lint=20D=C3=B3zsa?= dozsabal...@gmail.com

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Takao font support for 3.3.1.

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 20:22 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-3id=3b8c4baec540c851ebf97d933e11150192defa87 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32810 Patch looks fine to me too. Petr - if you review it too

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Mac builds / lang-packs ...

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Martin, On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 00:13 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: If LO dmg will grow to 350Mb or 400Mb (with help in all languages) So - in fact, we can compress the per-language help content down to around 1.5Mb of real content (with some lifting); That would still mean another

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Takao font support for 3.3.1.

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Kohei Yoshida wrote: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32810 If I understand correctly Takao font is used by several Linux distros as the default Japanese UI font, so getting that font recognized properly is pretty important. The change is pretty simple and IMO non-intrusive.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [REVIEW] Takao font support for 3.3.1.

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: Patch looks fine to me too. Petr - if you review it too this'd be great to have in 3.3.1 Counting 3 ACKs already, pushed for 3.3.1 -- Thorsten pgp3MZZppYvah.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-announce] LibreOffice 3.3.1 Release Candidate available

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Cor Nouws wrote: Thorsten Behrens wrote (11-02-11 11:53) The Document Foundation is happy to announce the release candidate of LibreOffice 3.3.1. This release candidate is the first in a series of Thanks, but as written also by others, there are no debs for x86. This was an unfortunate

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Thomas Arnhold wrote: Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#. Those are from the old Sun-internal bugtracker (in contrast to the old StarDivision-internal bugtracker, which is w/o letter prefix) - and can be elided as well. Pushed a change that does that. Cheers, --

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] In download.in file, use 3.3.1 as LibreOffice regexp value to correctly get tarballs.

2011-02-14 Thread Petr Mladek
Gökçen Eraslan píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 15:58 +: This patch makes ./download command in LibreOffice 3.3.1.0 work with --without-git option. Thanks a lot for the fix. I have pushed it into the libreoffice-3-3 and libreoffice-3-3-1 branches. Best Regards, Petr

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][PUSHED] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3

2011-02-14 Thread Petr Mladek
(updated subject) Cedric Bosdonnat píše v Po 14. 02. 2011 v 10:41 +0100: Hello Miklos, The patches looks ok to me. I'ld say ok for 3.3.1. It was the 3rd approval, so I cherry picked it into the libreoffice-3-3-1 branch as well. Best Regards, Petr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] In download.in file, use 3.3.1 as LibreOffice regexp value to correctly get tarballs.

2011-02-14 Thread Gökçen Eraslan
Pazartesi 14 Şubat 2011 günü (saat 13:16:01) Petr Mladek şunları yazmıştı: Gökçen Eraslan píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 15:58 +: This patch makes ./download command in LibreOffice 3.3.1.0 work with --without-git option. Thanks a lot for the fix. I have pushed it into the libreoffice-3-3 and

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove legacy Addin functions from calc

2011-02-14 Thread Alfonso Eusebio
Thanks all for the input! For what I can see, the quoted comment was introduced by Kurt Zenker in Sep-2006. ROT13 and the other date management functions present in the calc/addin code seem to be part of the newer (UNO based?) scadding functions. I've tested ROT13 and a couple of the others

Re: [Libreoffice] Problems with windows build

2011-02-14 Thread Fridrich Strba
Hello, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:05 +, Michael Meeks wrote: For me, saxparser crashes... I am debugging that but not really getting much I wonder if the stlport iterators were simply more robust against changes in the underlying structures. Is this a list it is iterating or a hash ?

Re: [Libreoffice] ODF 1.2 and extended

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Cesare Leonardi wrote: The question is: why using the extended version by default? Hi Cesare, well, because we'd otherwise need to stop developing new features (which have somewhat of an 2/3rd probability of affecting the file format). ODF 1.1 was approved more than four years ago, and 1.2 is

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-14 Thread Noel Power
although the fix for this issue will appear from dev300m98 onwards it would be worth I think getting this into a) libreoffice-3-3 ( one ack please ) and possibly b) libreoffice-3.3.1 ( 3 acks please ) I only mention 3.3.1 because there is a request in the bug to make oracle office 3.3.1.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Remove bogus comments

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! On 02/14/2011 02:01 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Thomas Arnhold wrote: Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#. Those are from the old Sun-internal bugtracker (in contrast to the old StarDivision-internal bugtracker, which is w/o letter prefix) - and can be elided

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] In download.in file, use 3.3.1 as LibreOffice regexp value to correctly get tarballs.

2011-02-14 Thread Petr Mladek
Gökçen Eraslan píše v Po 14. 02. 2011 v 15:29 +: Pazartesi 14 Şubat 2011 günü (saat 13:16:01) Petr Mladek şunları yazmıştı: Gökçen Eraslan píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 15:58 +: This patch makes ./download command in LibreOffice 3.3.1.0 work with --without-git option. Thanks a lot

Re: [Libreoffice] duplicate code (binfilter)

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
I've updated the wiki. On 02/14/2011 10:40 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Christina, On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 21:07 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: binfilter/bf_svtools/source/config/svt_menuoptions.cxx and svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx So - as Tor says, binfilter is

Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: [tdf-discuss] feature request, calc cell content copy behaviour

2011-02-14 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:44 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:35 +1100, Simon Cropper wrote: The behaviour that I am talking about is... 1. Insert value into A1, select the cell with the mouse so it is highlighted then copy with Ctrl-C 2. Select 3 or more other cells

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:49:32PM +0100, Bálint Dózsa dozsabal...@gmail.com wrote: -/** - An iterator for traversal of a set of properties. - - Sample code for use of iterator: - - \code - Return_t function(WW8PropertySet::tPointer pSet) - { - do_something; - -

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Remove legacy Addin functions from calc

2011-02-14 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:40 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: Thanks all for the input! For what I can see, the quoted comment was introduced by Kurt Zenker in Sep-2006. ROT13 and the other date management functions present in the calc/addin code seem to be part of the newer (UNO based?)

[Libreoffice] wiki accounts ...

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:12 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: I've updated the wiki. Incidentally, the problem with the wiki is spam (apparently). So - if you want an account best to ping Florian Effenberger or someone on the sysadmin team. I guess they just turned off account creation for

Re: [Libreoffice] [Partially Pushed] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi Balint, looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch - removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the description in writerfilter/inc/doctok/WW8Document.hxx as this is some kind of doxygen code. For the first patch, which removes the method, I'm not

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] crashing oosplash and malformed picture (bnc#652562)

2011-02-14 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, the attached patch fixes crashing oosplash and malformed picture. The first line fixes accessing aliased out buffer, see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652562#c22 The second line fixes broken if/if/else condition to do not bump the out pointer twice, see

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] need review: fix for #116920

2011-02-14 Thread Clio
Please, have a look at this patch. On my Linux system it seems to work fine. Here is the issue it could fix: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116920 - Sometimes RND returns 1 (one) . Here is how the code should look after the patch is applied: RTLFUNC(Rnd) { (void)pBasic;

Re: [Libreoffice] [Partially Pushed] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Bálint Dózsa
Hi Thomas, Thanks for the correction. Balint 2011/2/14 Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org Hi Balint, looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch - removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the description in

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Now I'm sure. It's unused. But the question is, if we want to use GetListTable() in DomainMapper class to replace pImpl-GetListTable() with GetListTable(). Could be the case, that this was prepared to. But wouldn't make anything better ;) So I pushed it, thanks! Thomas On 02/14/2011 05:49 PM,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] need review: fix for #116920

2011-02-14 Thread Noel Power
On 14/02/11 17:12, Clio wrote: Please, have a look at this patch. On my Linux system it seems to work fine. Here is the issue it could fix: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116920 - Sometimes RND returns 1 (one) . Here is how the code should look after the patch is applied:

[Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or less long list of files with copyright notice missing. I've attached it to the mail. I've only searched for cxx and hxx files. I filed a bug at OOo:

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] cppcheck easyhack

2011-02-14 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, One, likely final, cppcheck-found post- to pre-iterator patch. Cheers, Kevin From 8648528511581a0ac5cc7f08e9d2e83bd7fef4cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Hunter hunt...@earlham.edu Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:48:49 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] cppcheck: post- to pre- *crement change

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] cppcheck easyhack

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks! Pushed it. Thomas On 02/14/2011 07:54 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: Hullo List, One, likely final, cppcheck-found post- to pre-iterator patch. Cheers, Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] wiki accounts ...

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: Incidentally, the problem with the wiki is spam (apparently). So - if you want an account best to ping Florian Effenberger or someone on the sysadmin team. I guess they just turned off account creation for that purpose. Of course, if we have a budding

Re: [Libreoffice] Undo Redo Re: [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-14 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
hi Luke, I should have known better than to think it was that easy. :) I think it ought to be that easy... More documentation would speedup development and reduce bugs dramatically... (Maybe we should write a few doxygen comments for EditEngine, if we figure out how it works). I had a very bad

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] crashing oosplash and malformed picture (bnc#652562)

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Petr Mladek wrote: The first line fixes accessing aliased out buffer, see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652562#c22 The second line fixes broken if/if/else condition to do not bump the out pointer twice, see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652562#c16 Ugh. Yep,

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for i#115716 fdo#33964

2011-02-14 Thread Noel Power
(reposting with [PATCH] keyword although the fix for this issue will appear from dev300m98 onwards it would be worth I think getting this into a) libreoffice-3-3 ( one ack please ) and possibly b) libreoffice-3.3.1 ( 3 acks please ) I only mention 3.3.1 because there is a request in the bug

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or less long list of files with copyright notice missing. I've attached it to the mail. I've only

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or less long list of files with copyright notice missing.

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Deleting some commented out code

2011-02-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:55 -0500, L P wrote: Consider this a trial balloon to make I'm sure that I'm doing this right and helping -- and not hindering -- the project. Sure, looks good, pushed. Can you confirm that this patch, and potential future ones, are submitted under our recommended

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: You're right with ww8toolbar.* We need to make a list of the ones that belong to LibreOffice solely and have no copyright attribution and nag the initial committer to stick a correct header on top. C.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Deleting some commented out code

2011-02-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 21:07 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Can you confirm that this patch, and potential future ones, are submitted under our recommended LGPLv3+/MPL licence combo ? Doh, sorry, saw that now in your follow up mail. C. ___

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] O(U)StringBuffer::toString()

2011-02-14 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 14:52 +0100, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: Hi list, Since the toString() method is mentioned in the O*StringBuffer documentation I thought it was a good idea to actually have it... Yeah, especially handy because makeStringAndClear destroys the old contents, which makes it

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] O(U)StringBuffer::toString()

2011-02-14 Thread Sébastien Le Ray
Le Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:21:52 +, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com a écrit : As an aside, if you're big into the sal unit tests there's probably quite a few of them potentially useful which haven't been tweaked to work again, or are behind SUBSEQUENT_TESTS but probably don't need to be

[Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED 4/54] translated comments

2011-02-14 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, pushed 7 more diffs. Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Tools - Media Player

2011-02-14 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Thomas, Michael, all! Thanks for the great discussion ... let me add a few thoughts :-) Am Sonntag, den 13.02.2011, 19:09 +0100 schrieb Thomas Arnhold: Christoph thanks for the discussion link and the specs! You're welcome. I'd love to play a more proactive role at the moment, but referring

Re: [Libreoffice] Undo Redo Re: [REVIEW] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2011-02-14 Thread Luke Dixon
Hi Jonas, On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 20:17 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote: I think it ought to be that easy... More documentation would speedup development and reduce bugs dramatically... (Maybe we should write a few doxygen comments for EditEngine, if we figure out how it works).

Re: [Libreoffice] ODF 1.2 and extended

2011-02-14 Thread Cesare Leonardi
On 14/02/2011 15:22, Thorsten Behrens wrote: ODF 1.1 was approved more than four years ago, and 1.2 is still not done - this is something that just won't fly. LibO uses ODF as its native file format, so there's really no other way to save new features. Hi Thorsten and thank you for your

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32852] Re: [Linux] LibORC2: Impress video / `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not found

2011-02-14 Thread NoOp
On 01/05/2011 10:29 AM, NoOp wrote: On 01/05/2011 02:06 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi there, On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 11:23 -0800, NoOp wrote: (soffice:22820): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so':

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] More Default Formatting -- Clear Direct Formatting

2011-02-14 Thread Octavio Alvarez
Hi! Sorry for the long time gap between the two patch sets. In the following two patches I continue the work on renaming Default Formatting to Clear Direct Formatting. In the past patchset, Cédric reported problems applying patches to the help files so I'm submitting this patch refreshed.

Re: [Libreoffice] Issue in Base

2011-02-14 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Behrens wrote (09-02-11 08:21) Cor Nouws wrote: Bugzilla query returns zarro boogs so hence my question: is anyone aware of the bug in base wrt tool bars for report building? See users list [...] at least I'm not - so better file a bug for it. I'd rather have a dupe,

Re: [Libreoffice] Some help for LibreOffice testing with ODF ?

2011-02-14 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Thorsten Behrens wrote (09-02-11 08:25) Cor Nouws wrote: Quote: before the next plugfest it would be really useful if someone from the LibreOffice community would set up a copy of LibreOffice for Officeshots.org (ideally on multiple platforms and both a trunk [...] I did that in the