[Libreoffice] [ fdo#35480]

[LibO 3.3 fdo#35480]: Error is valid for LibO-3.4.0_b2 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/fdo-35480-tp2869240p2869240.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] Where to put intro and about pics?

Hi Petr, Michael, I am using these switches I just wanted to put the pictures under for example bootstrap/brands or images. Thank, KAMI 2011/4/26 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz: Michael Meeks píše v Út 26. 04. 2011 v 11:27 +0100: Hi Kami, On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 15:59 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

You are well aware of the OOo-dev build process. Thanks for the mind-reading, but I think you need to try harder. For the record, I have never heard about that. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] fix fdo#bug 36404 -More than one text cursor at the same time in textfields

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:20:31AM +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: Hi All, In cursor.cxx I found 2 lines accidentally deleted by this patch it seems : vcl119: #i80730# fix cursor paint behavior and timer I've tried to find an explication of this deleted ligne, but without Timer.Stop() I

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

2011/4/26 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:05 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 04/26/2011 07:07 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 20:13 -0700, NoOp wrote: Just wanted to point out that both LO 3.4B1 LO3.4B2 .deb installs

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

Christian Lohmaier wrote: There probably aren't any patches necessary, just try whether the openofficedev target works Thanks Christian, that's the ~sole bit of really useful info in this whole thread. FWIW, the relevant bug is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36437 Cheers, --

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

NoOp wrote: The OP requested that beta versions be installed w/o affecting existing version. You are well aware of the OOo-dev build process. You are well aware of the issue, Yet you are asking posters to this thread to dig out the documentation, test that it still works? Amazing. Hi NoOp,

[Libreoffice] Proteja seu Patrimonio

Gate CetralCaso não consiga visualizar este e-mail, clique aqui Gate Central Tecnologia de ponta para sua segurança Cercas elétricas e Cercas Navalha Proteja sua propriedade com cercas elétricas e Cercas Navalhas e mantenha longe os delinquentes. Equipamentos de Vídeo Vigilância Monitore

Re: [Libreoffice] QA process

Hey Sophie, Thanks for mentioning it :) I have ever sent a process document to wiki in the mid of the month (13/Apr or so). The content attached as follows as well. It would be great if you have a review if time. Best wishes, Yifan ---8-

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Introduce HideDisabledMenuItems style setting

Am 27.04.2011 13:01:36 schrieb Christoph Noack: Just a small question ... do I get it right that the disabled menu items get hidden instead of being grayed out? Real interest: could you please explain what the rationale for the change is? As far as I know, there is currently no platform

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] fix fdo#bug 36404 -More than one text cursor at the same time in textfields

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:37:54AM +0200, David Tardon wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:56:50AM +0200, David Tardon wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:20:31AM +0200, Robert Dargaud wrote: Hi All, In cursor.cxx I found 2 lines accidentally deleted by this patch it seems :

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

HI Andras, *, On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/26 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:05 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: There probably aren't any patches necessary, just try whether the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Introduce HideDisabledMenuItems style setting

Hi Christian, *, On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Christian Dywan christ...@lanedo.com wrote: I'm introducing a setting that decides if disabled menu items should be hidden. Currently the code is broken in the sense that items are hidden if disabled on all platforms and

Re: [Libreoffice] ChDir and user written dll

Hi On 26/04/11 20:46, pjpuchyr wrote: Running calc, I need to load a dll which is not in the search path, and my problem is that the Basic ChDir statement does nothing on Windows 7, so the dll can never be found. Is there a solution to this problem? afaik ChDir doesn't work on *any* platform

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

On Windows it wants to package jre which is not there. So: $ touch ../../solver/300/wntmsci12.pro/bin/jre-6u22-windows-i586.exe $ dmake openofficedev OK, so there's a bug. It should only attempt to include the JRE when you build openofficewithjre target - so apparently the Product name

[Libreoffice] FW: [PATCH] Introduce HideDisabledMenuItems style setting

I'm introducing a setting that decides if disabled menu items should be hidden. Currently the code is broken in the sense that items are hidden if disabled on all platforms and UpdateApplicationSettings which theortically does that is a) counter-intuitive and b) not set by platforms. I'm

Re: [Libreoffice] FW: [PATCH] Introduce HideDisabledMenuItems style setting

Hi Allen, *, On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.org wrote: I'm introducing a setting that decides if disabled menu items should be hidden. Currently the code is broken in the sense that items are hidden if disabled on all platforms and

Re: [Libreoffice] FW: [PATCH] Introduce HideDisabledMenuItems style setting

No objections from my part to fully hide, removed / not-allowed-by-sysadmin ones, but when it comes to hiding entries that cannot be performed at the moment for whatever reason, then I say no, thanks. That is the way it currently works under Windows. The former uses a permanent switch, while

Re: [Libreoffice] FW: [PATCH] Introduce HideDisabledMenuItems style setting

Am 27.04.2011 15:40:35 schrieb Allen Pulsifer: No objections from my part to fully hide, removed / not-allowed-by-sysadmin ones, but when it comes to hiding entries that cannot be performed at the moment for whatever reason, then I say no, thanks. That is the way it currently works

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove SV_DECL_REF macro

0009-Remove-unused-macros-for-GraphicDocShell.impress.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove List from ZoomList class

0001-Remove-deprecated-container-List-in-ZoomList.impress.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove tools/list.hxx include

0001-Remove-tools-list.hxx.libs-gui.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove deprecated List container

0003-Remove-deprecated-List-container-maTextRuleL.impress.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_TABLE( SwRTFStyleTbl, SwTxtFmtColl* )

0001-Remove-DECLARE_TABLE-SwRTFStyleTbl-SwTxtFmtCo.writer.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_TABLE( SwRTFCharStyleTbl, SwCharFmt* )

0002-Remove-DECLARE_TABLE-SwRTFCharStyleTbl-SwChar.writer.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove List usage in SdPublishingDlg

0004-Remove-deprecated-container-List-in-SdPublis.impress.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove deprecated List container in FontCollection

0002-Remove-deprecated-List-container-in-FontColl.impress.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove tools/table.hxx include

0002-Remove-tools-table.hxx-include.libs-gui.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove deprecated List container

They all related to the same files, try to apply them in the same order, thanks ^^ 0005-Remove-deprecated-List-container-from-Sectio.impress.patch Description: Binary data 0006-Remove-deprecated-List-container-in-PropRead.impress.patch Description: Binary data

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused sstring files in bootstrp

0001-Remove-unused-sstring-files-in-bootstrp.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] QA process

Hi Yifan, On 27/04/2011 13:42, Yifan Jiang wrote: Hey Sophie, Thanks for mentioning it :) You're welcome, my fault to be so late. I have ever sent a process document to wiki in the mid of the month (13/Apr or so). The content attached as follows as well. It would be great if you have a

[Libreoffice] Next IRC QA session

Hi all, I'm adding the dev list in cc but only for information, please follow the discussion on the tdf-discuss@list. I would like to organize a new IRC QA session during the RC period. The last one, hum, was a bit empty, but we won't resign ;) So I think we (I) should dedicate a bit more

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove SV_DECL_REF macro

Pushed, thanks B. -- \ Katarina Machalkova \\\__o LibO developer __\\\'/_ hedgehog painter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Remove SV_DECL_REF macro

... really pushed, I mean :) B. -- \ Katarina Machalkova \\\__o LibO developer __\\\'/_ hedgehog painter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ LibreOffice mailing

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove usage of List in SbiDdeControl

Well this patch is for windows only, but i develop only in linux, so if anyone can please review it and test it for me. Thanks 0001-Remove-usage-of-List-for-DdeConnection-in-SbiDdeCont.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Remove deprecated List container in FontCollection

Looks good, thanks. Pushed B. -- \ Katarina Machalkova \\\__o LibO developer __\\\'/_ hedgehog painter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ LibreOffice mailing

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove tools/list.hxx include

Windows only patch, please review it and make sure it compiles without issues on a windows pc, but it looks straightfoward thing so it should be any issue with it. Thanks 0001-Remove-tools-list.hxx-include.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST(DdeConnections, DdeConnection*)

This is a windows only patch, please check it compiles fine and without errors, thanks! 0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeConnections-DdeConnection.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Introduce HideDisabledMenuItems style setting

Hi Christian! Sorry, it seems that I'm still a bit confused about that issue ... Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 11:13 + schrieb Christian Dywan: Am 27.04.2011 13:01:36 schrieb Christoph Noack: Just a small question ... do I get it right that the disabled menu items get hidden instead of

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST(DdeTopics, DdeTopic*) [Windows only]

This is a windows only patch, please check that you can compile it and check that i didnt miss anything. Thanks ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST(DdeTopics, DdeTopic*) [Windows only]

Oops forgot to send patch On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Rafael Dominguez venccsra...@gmail.comwrote: This is a windows only patch, please check that you can compile it and check that i didnt miss anything. Thanks 0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeTopics-DdeTopic.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [Libreoffice] Installation issue

El martes, 26-abril-2011 a les 17:24 -0700, Dan Hopper escribió: I have a problem (inexperience) going to the 'command line' to install Libreoffice. Is there an easier way to complete the installation? Hi, Dan! It's hard for us to guess which kind of instalation are you trying to

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Zack zcrevel...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36613 --- Comment #40 from

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST(DdeItems, DdeItem*) [Windows]

Windows only patch, please check that it compiles without error and i didnt forget anything, thanks!! 0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeItems-DdeItem.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

Hi all, Thorsten Behrens wrote (27-04-11 10:42) Thanks Christian, that's the ~sole bit of really useful info in this whole thread. FWIW, the relevant bug is Furthermore, with due respect, this thread shows me some other useful information. Namely that there is a limit to what developers may

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Zack zcrevel...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36615 --- Comment #41 from

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix cppcheck warnings in components (easy hack)

The attached patch fixes lots of cppcheck warnings in the components repository. By the way, did anybody review my latest pyuno patch update? Or am I not patient enough :) --Andreas Becker -- All my code in this e-mail is under LGPLv3+/MPL. From 965ff54b77b5ee87758d9bc1fe5c9c906192effd Mon Sep

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

Linking in the footer of the list is a good idea I think. Also, why not give a description (and list of expectations) of the developer list at the dev list signup page and at the mailing list description page? Seems like knowing the rules _before_ engaging would be useful.

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST(DdeTransactions, DdeTransaction*) [Windows only]

Windows only patch, please compile and check that theres no errors, thanks 0001-Remove-DECLARE_LIST-DdeTransactions-DdeTransaction.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove DECLARE_LIST(DdeServices, DdeService*) [Windows only]

Windows only patch, please compile and check that theres no errors, thanks ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Crash log attached....

As a retired Mac developer I would like to help track down this reproducible bug. Whom should I contact? Do I need to subscribe to the developers list? The crash log gives all the details of my setup. Both OpenOffice 3.3.0 and LibreOffice 3.3.2 exhibit this behaviour. Steps to reproduce: (0)

Re: [Libreoffice] Installation issue

Thank you for responding. I'm running on an iMac G5 w/intel chip. Mac OSX 10.6.7 operating system. Dan Hopper Xuacu wrote: El martes, 26-abril-2011 a les 17:24 -0700, Dan Hopper escribió: I have a problem (inexperience) going to the 'command line' to install

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-users] Re: Crash log attached.

Nope same SIGSEV problem using 3.4beta2 How can I help track this down? Peter Process: soffice [2170] Path:/Users/pteeson/Desktop/LibreOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice Identifier: org.libreoffice.script Version: 3.4.0 (???) Code Type: X86 (Native) Parent

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing beta versions replacing stable versions

On 04/26/2011 11:54 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: You are well aware of the OOo-dev build process. Thanks for the mind-reading, but I think you need to try harder. For the record, I have never heard about that. --tml I was replying to MM. But come on Tor; I've great respect for you and

Re: [Libreoffice] QA process

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:57:39PM +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: ---8- Hi Sophie / Petr and all, Thanks for the comments and ideas! I updated several wiki pages today to outline what we got through the discussion. Please would you have a