Apologies, but I am having trouble accessing my wiki account: it has been a
long while. So, I am delivering this via email. If there is no ESC veto or
rework demand in the next few days I will get these into the GSoC Idea page
even if I have to re-register.
The lexer idea came from elsewhere
Julien,
Looks to me like a very nice catch ...
Here is the version as of 2011.06.15 showing braces on the for loops in both
then and else blocks...
from open grok --
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/ui/docshell/docfunc.cxx?r=1b363f632110e80ead67ff376e92e4487556ca55
If only I could *always* read well ... and I didn't second guess myself so
easily ...
The stack trace from 47466 - Crash occurring in Windows 64bit versions...
msvcr90!_invalid_parameter_noinfo+0xc
sclo!std::_Treestd::_Tset_traitslt;short,std::lesslt;short,std::allocatorshort,0
With help from Norbert was able to get my ssh client straightened out and
submit this patch through gerrit:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/1464/
Thanks for your speed and patience Norbert.
FWIW, I am back in the pool!
LeMoyne
--
View this message in context:
Hi Korrawit,
My take is:
-- you (and others) cannot reproduce fdo#37584 (redlined text disappears)
in 3-3 or 3-3-3 because my patch referenced in your original post [OP] is
not in the 3-3 branches.
-- you and others cannot reproduce 'leading quote as word' in your 3-3
build because the
Michael @ OP - awesome set of notes!
Cor @
I only can point to my favourite page:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
Even though I have two build configs (3.4 and master), OOo3.2 and the 3.4
release installed, I have been frustrated in doing full triage/testing and
Hi Korrawit, Cedric, all ...
A first, quick reply is that this patch of mine contains the dread redline
wipeout:
+ // make a copy of the text
+ String rTextCopy = const_castlt;Stringamp;gt;(m_Text);
The latter needs to be modified to include (or be immediately followed by)
Cedric's fix:
-
Attached is another patch (in libs-gui repo) that is in 3.4 but not in 3.3
found with lo-commit-stat using:
root/bin $perl lo-commit-stat --log-dir='./' --log-suffix='mjWCRL-3.3'
--rev-list ../ --until='2010-12-01' --author='Johnsson'
origin/libreoffice-3-4 ^origin/libreoffice-3-3
and shown
Drew,
I appreciate your position and your moderate, thoughtful questions and
responses all across the several boards I have seen them on. I am still
attracted to Apache and their OO project, but I finally balked on the
proposal so clearly NOT written by a community or its representatives.
My
Caolan,
Thanks for the potential shortcut. Sadly it did not work - I got the same
failure (at least in terminal output). My master repo hasn't built yet this
month and has suffered multiples of several different unit test failures and
almost as many partial builds. I can see why the tests that
HI Bjoern, Xisco and all,
=After smoketest fails in master like so:
officeconnection.cxx:140:Assertion
Test name: N12_GLOBAL__N_14TestE::test
setUp() failed
- equality assertion failed
- Expected: 2
- Actual : 0
Failures !!!
Run: 1 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0
(which
Actually not at all sure where to clean+build to get missing uno symbols in
the log
Looks like an assortment of dirs may be involved
Help would be appreciated as it is ~necessary for me to proceed here.
-- jlc
--
View this message in context:
Hi Petr,
I was thinking about cranking through the past emails like this one and
generating Development Summary pages on the wiki by hand.
Then I discovered the related easy hack --
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks_Complete_List#Weekly_summary_.2F_Release_summary
I
Hi Cor,
I think the Weekly Development Summary might do what u want. It tends to
slide by unnoticed because no one replies to it as they are all plowing
straight ahead. Here is an easy way to find it...
Go to top/thread view of dev list in Nabble --
Caolan,
I saw your related posts here and on bug 37668. You have an amazing eye to
spot that very not obvious sign extension error as the difference between 64
bit OK and 32 not OK. Thanks for making the connection explicit here.
My first attempt failed (later?) in tail_build within
Cedric,
I apologize for the time cost for you to dig this up.
I do remember removing a string copy (or maybe two?). I should have clearly
seen the need for a full copy after digging into the counting process and
seeing the changes it made to the string in order to count excluding hidden
or
Test with LibreOffice 3.3.2
OOO330m19 (Build:202)
tag libreoffice-3.3.2
shows that Changes-Record does not produce redlining there either
I feel sick
jlc=={*-P}
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/REVIEW-fix-for-fdo-37584-tp3038258p3039788.html
Sent from
here is entire log of output in pastebin -
I apologize for inlining it earlier
http://pastebin.com/E4XuVt0M
jlc
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-build-Seg-faults-in-starmath-test-tp3020219p3020979.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at
Hi all,
I did some work on LibreOffice in late 2010. Returning now I see that the
timed release schedule has created several branches that correspond to the
various release configurations. All well and good. The issue I am
experiencing is related to the various issues with standard
Hi Xisco,
I think your Java-Python porting project is awesome. My experience is thin
on many counts here: Java, Python, pyuno and LibreOffice, but I have been
curious about them all, so I dove in a little on your question.
My short answer of encouragement: Yes, you can solve it!
One
I like the idea of replacing the internal regexp in favor of a more fully
developed regexp evaluator. The goal should be to get rid of the weaker
regexp module. A question I don't know how to answer is which is the best
replacement. As Thorsten points out, ideally the replacement should be
Pierre,
One thing to look out for in longer subroutines is that a variable will be
setup at the top of a subroutine and some one will later duplicate its
declaration and initialization near the end. In that case, the second vars
decl and init can simply be deleted.
-- LeMoyne
--
View this
Thanks for giving Libre Office it's very own readme. One thing that popped
out at me from the Getting Involved section was this: familiarize yourself
with many of the topics covered since the ${PRODUCTNAME} source code was
released back in October 2000. I dunno if you want OpenOffice for a
Hi David,
Just a few notes:
-- The BeanShell, Javascript and Python options have disappeared cleanly
from the Tools-Macros-Organize menu.
-- I expect that the Help will need updating to reflect the fact that
these are now options and to explain how to bring them back for people that
Noel Power wrote:
No, I don't mean setting up an OOO build ;-) but just checking against a
OOO330m13 dev build ( that can downloaded from openoffice.org )
OIC, I was making it too hard - rooted around at OOo and found the debs...
Thanks -- LeMoyne
--
View this message in context:
Noel Power wrote:
I wonder if the recent rebase to OOO330m13 is the culprit, would be
interesting if you could test against the corresponding oracle dev build
Yes, I see that test would be useful.
Not about to setup an OOO build, but will consider it if you think that
would be useful
Hi all,
Ok, after getting over a short-term dislike of Word Count - with a new found
appreciation for some of the developer comments in OOo issuezilla - I had a
new idea for a test plan. Perhaps turning on the Scanner clipping has
*accidentally* fixed the quote problem as well. Although I
I'am very new to git (only have used sometimes 'git clone' before) , and I
don't get it very well...
I am brand new to git and I felt confused alot until I found this --
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development#Using_Git_for_LibreOffice_development
-- this ref explains many things
-Original Message-
From: Michael Meeks [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] [ml-node
+1834110-443277665-232...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: 11/3/2010 4:19:16 AM
... Wrt. re-doing the dialog layout - can you
hold off on that - Ricardo is working now on some awesome new VCL
layout
Adds '=' to edge test in sbxscan.cxx ImpCvtNum so exponent prints and 1
million is 1e+6 instead of just 1 for singles.
Same one char change does similar fix for OO Basic doubles and 1e+14.
When I saw #i76852# -- http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76852
-- describe how and when
30 matches
Mail list logo
