Re: [SOLVED sort of ]

>>> "RE" == Rene Engelhard writes: > Hi, >> I hoped that >> sudo add-apt-repository ppa:gnome3-team/gnome3-staging >> sudo add-apt-repository ppa:gnome3-team/gnome3 > Maybe you just shouldn't use a ~ 7.5 years old release? Yeah I know, I have my reasons believe me, but I have to resolve this

[SOLVED sort of ] (was: LO does not run on Ubuntu 16.04)

>>> "CM" == Caolán McNamara writes: > On Sat, 2021-10-09 at 18:25 +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> /opt/libreoffice7.2/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error: >> /opt/libreoffice7.2/program/libvclplug_gtk3lo.so: undefined symbol: >> gtk_widget_

LO does not run on Ubuntu 16.04

to follow the advice found in https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/installed-libreoffice-7-1-on-ubuntu-16-04-lts-it-does-not-start-and-i-get-the-following-error/61992/3 But it does not work Any help would be appreciated Regards Uwe Brauer

Re: Reveal Codes macros now works

> On 10/07/19 17:54, Andrew Pitonyak wrote: > I would also appreciate having a copy of them to try. Unfortunately, I > am likely to be highly critical, but then, I hope those comments will be > helpful. Please take in mind, that Andrew is not the original author. I find it very generous of him

Re: Reveal Codes macros now works

>>> "AP" == Andrew Pitonyak writes: > There was so much static related to the orginal question, that I opted to > simply started a new thread.  > I was provided with a linke to the orignal documents: > https://web.archive.org/web/20180326030224/http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/hillview/OOo/ >

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

> On 7/7/19 4:35 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > I now possess a copy of the offending .docx document and the PDF > version of it. (It contains 1.6MB, so it will take some time.) > Tomorrow, I will be determining what is necessary to fix it. Rather > than guess as to what would be required, I will find

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

> On 06/07/19 07:36, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Plus I'm a *text* guy. MS is very much a *visual* company (as are most > people, actually). So the MS way of doing things is alien to me - the WP > way of "here's a gui, this drops into the text setup behind it" is just > *so* *

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

>>> "TL" == Tor Lillqvist writes: >> >> >> >> The issue is, what if you force to deal with docx and you run into >> problems? > The data structure inside a .docx has very little relationship to the > internal data structures inside LO, so it would be extremely hard to > display "codes" from

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

>>> "TL" == Tor Lillqvist writes: > No. There are no "codes" to "reveal" in LibreOffice. > If you want to use a markup format, use a markup format, in a plain text > editor. Simple as that. LaTeX for instance. I think you miss the point and I am saying that as long time user of latex, (daily

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

> On 05/07/19 13:14, Uwe Brauer wrote: > And all I am saying is that the feature you describe sounds to me > NOTHING LIKE reveal codes, and personally I can't see any use for it. > The Word equivalent is "show formatting" which - like I said - was > ignored by lus

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

> On 05/07/19 13:15, Uwe Brauer wrote: > THANK YOU VERY MUCH! > I've never seen that, but I've got the linux WP8 somewhere, plus licence > keys, so I'll have to try. I run gentoo, so it'll be a bit different, > but ... :-) BTW, the relevant files mentioned, you will

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

>>> "Wl" == Wol's lists writes: > On 04/07/2019 11:08, Uwe Brauer wrote: > And yes, I would dearly love to have reveal codes back - so much so > that I am seriously considering shelling out for an up-to-date copy of > WordPerfect, but sadly I suspe

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

> On 05/07/19 09:16, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Sorry but that completely misses the point. If it's read-only I won't > even bother to learn how to use it ... The point is: Since almost 10 years people are demanding such a feature and nothing happened. All I am saying is: if a

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

>>> "Wl" == Wol's lists writes: > On 04/07/2019 11:08, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >> From time to time the question pops up whether LO could support >> Wordperfects reveal code. Sometimes it is stated that this feature could >> be implemented by a macro

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

>>> "AP" == Andrew Pitonyak writes: > So I read your response to say... > If it is a read only display them it is not worth the time to bother with > it... > That is certainly easier than trying to make it work :-) I would say, read only is a first step and if users start to like it then

Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

>>> "TB" == Thorsten Behrens writes: > Hi Uwe, > Uwe Brauer wrote: >> Is there somebody with enough knownledge in macros to translate those >> macros to LO 6.2? >> > Perhaps - I'd suggest you upload them somewhere (provided they a

Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO

around 2005 for OO 1.2, using the sxw format. I tried them out in LO 6.2 and they don't work. Is there somebody with enough knownledge in macros to translate those macros to LO 6.2? Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice