Rob Snelders píše v Út 22. 11. 2011 v 20:12 +0100:
No those days aren't the only way to test. But it is a way to get more
people to test the software and to test the software in ways that the
developers won't think about.
I think there are enough people that want to help but don't know how,
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (23-11-11 10:28)
All in all I would say it is needed to organise these events..
I fully agree. I was just a bit scared by Cor's mail. It made me feel
that Janury 21 would be the only day when people should test LO-3.5. I
am happy to hear that it is not true. :-)
Cor Nouws píše v So 19. 11. 2011 v 16:56 +0100:
Cor Nouws wrote (13-11-11 21:20)
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
I'm afraid Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier will be
the critical/limiting condition.
No those days aren't the only way to test. But it is a way to get more
people to test the software and to test the software in ways that the
developers won't think about.
I think there are enough people that want to help but don't know how,
and testing is a easy way to step in.
At last I also
Cor Nouws wrote (13-11-11 21:20)
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
I'm afraid Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier will be
the critical/limiting condition.
[...]
You are perfectly right there!
(This
On 16/11/11 19:59, Petr Mladek wrote:
I am surprised that anyone still uses it. The following two bugs makes
me feel that it does not work for LO-3.4 and master:
testtool should work ( afaik ) on 3.4 ( I thought I fixed it there ), of
course there may be some tests that somehow now don't work
Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this
topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only
language-related functionality :)
August Sodora
aug...@gmail.com
(201) 280-8138
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Noel Power nopo...@suse.com wrote:
On
Cor Nouws píše v Pá 11. 11. 2011 v 17:40 +0100:
Hi,
As a result of the discussions, the presentation, at the LibOCon, here
are the conclusions.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
and the places where people can comment and show commitment.
What do you think?
I asked this once on IRC but it seems to me that some people are
actually using the testtool so I figured I'd ask again to a broader
audience. Is there any interest in maintaining/cleaning up the
testtool? If not is there a way that those tests can be rewritten to
work in one of the other test
August Sodora píše v St 16. 11. 2011 v 14:43 -0500:
I asked this once on IRC but it seems to me that some people are
actually using the testtool so I figured I'd ask again to a broader
audience. Is there any interest in maintaining/cleaning up the
testtool? If not is there a way that those
+ https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37059
This bug is a WORKSFORME, I can run the testtool and some tests no
problem with it.
I'll see what I can learn about migrating the old set of tests.
August Sodora
aug...@gmail.com
(201) 280-8138
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Petr Mladek
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06)
I'm afraid Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier will be
the critical/limiting condition.
[...]
You are perfectly right there!
(This information was contained in the slides that I did not include in
the version linked from that
12 matches
Mail list logo
