Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Niko, On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 02:41 +0300, Niko Rönkkö wrote: I think that it would be best to name all options consistently like: I like the idea of consistent naming; though we need to make sure that all the distro packagers at least get notified so they can change their .spec files,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-27 Thread Wols Lists
On 26/10/10 23:53, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: sigh/ I must get used to that this list doesn't set reply to list... Oh brother, I hear you. I personally prefer that a list gets all traffic, end of discussion. However, it was pointed out

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-27 Thread Wols Lists
On 27/10/10 00:41, Niko Rönkkö wrote: And then there is that: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/configure.in#n128 Which is definedly wrong and which nobody knows how it should be... I'm looking at this :-) It looks to me (looking at the autoconf doc) that this is a clear

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-27 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 7:39am -0400 Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Wols Lists wrote: I just click on reply list :-) Thunderbird has that option if you want to use that ... So it does! Apparently since the 3.0. I've been using my keyboard friends: Ctrl+R (respond directly to author) Ctrl+Shift+R (respond to everyone)

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Niko, *, sigh/ I must get used to that this list doesn't set reply to list... On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Niko Rönkkö niko.ron...@wippies.fi wrote: Licenced under MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ of course. Cleaning and organizing of configure.in: Make configure --help be more coherent,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts are spread apart, build tool options are interspread the feature/code switches, extension-switches are

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kevin Hunter hunt...@earlham.edu wrote: At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts are spread apart, build

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: sigh/ I must get used to that this list doesn't set reply to list... Oh brother, I hear you. I personally prefer that a list gets all traffic, end of discussion. However, it was pointed out to me about 6 months ago that I'm the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Niko Rönkkö
Hi all! On 25.10.2010 01:55, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts are spread apart, build tool options are interspread the feature/code switches, extension-switches are