Re: [Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2012-01-10 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 01/09/2012 08:16 AM, Noel Power wrote: On 06/01/12 21:39, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: Off hand, I might be inclined to simply move the code back to its original location, which would set the behavior back to letting math with dates return dates, rather than just specific operations

Re: [Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2012-01-09 Thread Noel Power
On 06/01/12 21:39, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: Off hand, I might be inclined to simply move the code back to its original location, which would set the behavior back to letting math with dates return dates, rather than just specific operations (which is not even supported now). yeah I

Re: [Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2012-01-06 Thread Noel Power
Andrew, Apologies for the late reply, just back from vacation and now trying to chip away at the mountain of mail backlog On 01/01/12 16:01, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: Thanks for checking Will wait and see what Noel has to say... I say I don't know :-) hmm I think I dropped the ball

Re: [Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2012-01-06 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 01/06/2012 11:48 AM, Noel Power wrote: Andrew, Apologies for the late reply, just back from vacation and now trying to chip away at the mountain of mail backlog On 01/01/12 16:01, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: Thanks for checking Will wait and see what Noel has to say... I say I

Re: [Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2012-01-02 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
I created a bug for this. https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44385 I will poke around and see if I am able to build the source and test a solution... Running git now. On 01/01/2012 11:01 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: Thanks for checking Will wait and see what

Re: [Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2012-01-01 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Andrew, I don't know any about the content, but I have searched, when the changes where made: The part // #45465 Date needs with + a special handling: forces date type if( GetType() == SbxDATE || rOp.GetType() == SbxDATE ) aL.eType = SbxDATE; moved from

Re: [Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2012-01-01 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Thanks for checking Will wait and see what Noel has to say... The change broke more in that it also ignores EXP, MUL, DIV, MINUS, and NEG. I expect, however, that PLUS and MINUS are the most common operations (to add and subtract days and similar). I cannot think of a highly plausible

[Libreoffice] Change in addition for date handling (intentional change??)

2011-12-31 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
I thought I found a bug, I decided to take a crack at fixing the bug, and then I became confused because the bug appears to be intentional. Let me explain: Consider some comments related to Basic. In the last release of OOo, the statement Now + 2 returns a date / time that is two days later