Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-28 Thread Steve Butler
Hi Michael, On 28 January 2011 04:04, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:        Licensing wise - I'd like to add the standard LGPLv3+/MPL header to it (see bootstrap/) but having MIT too is fine if you want. This patch adds the (c) header from the template to the idxdict.cpp

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-28 Thread Steve Butler
On 28 January 2011 20:29, Steve Butler sebut...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Michael, I have no idea how this would be integrated into the build process as I'm not even sure where it is called from, but happy if someone wants to take up the challenge and/or incorporate it as an installer process.

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-28 Thread Steve Butler
On 28 January 2011 23:06, Steve Butler sebut...@gmail.com wrote: Baby steps... this patch uses the idxdict program to build the idx files instead of the perl script. Sorry, II forgot to state the previous patch is LGPL/MPL licensed as requested. ___

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Steven, On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:17 +1000, Steven Butler wrote: One idea, can we generate thesaurus idx file during install? That may solve few megabytes. .. I have had an attempt at this - code attached, it is dual licensed under LGPL / MIT although there are no (c) headers in the

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-27 Thread Steven Butler
Wow - great work :-) I've just pushed this to dictionaries/source in master, and compiled it there. Still need some tweaks to get it called in the various dictionaries/ makefiles I suppose - but it is a great start thanks ! Licensing wise - I'd like to add the standard LGPLv3+/MPL

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-25 Thread Steven Butler
One idea, can we generate thesaurus idx file during install? That may solve few megabytes. Oh - right; 4Mb of that - which we can (I assume easily) build at install time; I've added that to the spreadsheet, and re-up-loaded it. It should be quite fun in fact to re-write the somewhat

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-24 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:55 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Of course, help dunging out the sillies that still lurk in there - eg. 'soffice.exe' and 'soffice.bin', bundled testtool, and so on much appreciated. .. Out of curiosity Michael are we also packaging with the installers the

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-24 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 01/24/2011 11:39 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:55 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Of course, help dunging out the sillies that still lurk in there - eg. 'soffice.exe' and 'soffice.bin', bundled testtool, and so on much appreciated. .. Out of curiosity Michael

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-24 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 02:31 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: It seems we ship makefile.mk in libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout Odd; I don't see that on windows - in my file list. On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 02:16 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: idxexample*.odt:

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-24 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 02:31 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: Hi! It seems we ship makefile.mk in libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout That is not necessary. 71c5b530111a2150a42439d2c3f67cf1ad943c91 extras/source/templates/layout/makefile.mk added an exclude for makefile.* so that

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-24 Thread plino
Can you get rid of those 120 zero byte files or are these needed? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RC4-Windows-size-analysis-tp2302919p2319901.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-22 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/21/11 5:26 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi guys, So - I re-ran the analysis on RC4 which is here: http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/sizes3.ods (2.2Mb) Apart from a minor cockup (leaving tons of themes in there - when we only really want tango + hicontrast) - the

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-22 Thread plino
As soon as you remove the extra language packs and dictionaries, as well as the extensions, I'm sure it will go down to the same size as the OOo installer ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RC4-Windows-size-analysis-tp2302919p2311479.html Sent from the Dev

[Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-21 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, So - I re-ran the analysis on RC4 which is here: http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/sizes3.ods (2.2Mb) Apart from a minor cockup (leaving tons of themes in there - when we only really want tango + hicontrast) - the next major source of bloat is code, and the

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

2011-01-21 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Title: Szalai Kálmán Hi! It seems we ship makefile.mk in libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout That is not necessary. KAMI 2011-01-21 17:26 keltezéssel, Michael Meeks írta: Hi guys, So - I re-ran the analysis on RC4 which is