[Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, there is a proposal to use the tag libreoffice-3.3.0.1 instead of LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as is. It is more clear and understandable. Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-rc2? Note that the uppercase- and underscore-naming scheme comes

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Robert Nagy
sure On (2010-12-07 16:36), Petr Mladek wrote: Hi, there is a proposal to use the tag libreoffice-3.3.0.1 instead of LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as is. It is more clear and understandable. Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-rc2?

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:36 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: Hi, there is a proposal to use the tag libreoffice-3.3.0.1 instead of LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as is. It is more clear and understandable. Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-rc2?

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:36:33PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: there is a proposal to use the tag libreoffice-3.3.0.1 instead of LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as is. It is more clear and understandable. Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-rc2?