Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC defined C272 ) . Doesn't look that this is set anymore. Yeah, you got me there. No idea where C272 came from. I strongly suspect it was set to indicate

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 02/15/2011 10:28 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. Yeah, only take the completed one, VMS and Tru64

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:34:28AM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: I suppose we'll have to make such a list. All the Linux ports should remain, as should the BSDbased ones, MacOSX, Windows, Solaris and AIX as they work and are complete. The reality of what has a chance of working is the

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 11:34 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Removed SINIX and HP9000 (except for bootstrap). So HP-UX could be removed as well? Yeah, like I mentioned in some other mail, the only platforms that can possibly function are the ones that have a bridge in bridges/source/cpp_uno. SCO

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On the low-power topic there's some medium-level hacks to try and remove the unending timers that LibreOffice still has that keep waking up the CPU and eating battery life if that's an interest for you. Are the

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On the low-power topic there's some medium-level hacks to try and remove the unending timers that LibreOffice still has that keep waking up the CPU and eating battery

[Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 ... And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC) i.e. at impress/sd/source/ui/view/zoomlist.cxx:#if ( defined GCC defined C272 ) .

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 ... There is a full list of this stuff at bootstrap/solenv/bin/modules/osarch.pm We

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:14 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Hi, i stumbled across some precompiler checks for several (deprecated?) arches: HP9000 (already removed some parts of this) SINIX RM400 Yeah, those can all go. And another thing, in combination with GCC: C272 (occurs with GCC)

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: We also have at least msdos and Atari ST in dmake/ That's just the imported and hacked up third party dmake tool, so can be ignored. - i386 / amd64 - power / powerppc - sparc / sparc64 - arm - mips - alpha Everything else is

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:05:15PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: - i386 / amd64 - power / powerppc - sparc / sparc64 - arm - mips - alpha http://porting.openoffice.org/ might help btw. FWIW We (Red Hat, Inc.) build/ship

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:22 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Of the ports listed on http://porting.openoffice.org/ , Tru64 is dead and I would be surprised if VMS and Linux/m68k were much alive. Yeah, only take the completed one, VMS and Tru64 never actually happened. m68k only exists emulated