On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:56:06PM -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test.
Look for WIN , too, that is OOo-speak for 16-bit Windows. (NT-based Windows
it calls WNT.) You will find *much* of that. Some files that have #ifdef WIN
blocks,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support.
Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test.
It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most of them in
ure, components and libs-gui.
I never would
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support.
Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test.
It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most of
On 02/16/2011 09:53 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support.
Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test.
It seems many files are infected with WIN16 references, most of
Looking at your diffs for the SCO stuff, I found a _WIN16 test.
Look for WIN , too, that is OOo-speak for 16-bit Windows. (NT-based Windows it
calls WNT.) You will find *much* of that. Some files that have #ifdef WIN
blocks, then *inside* those have tests for WNT. WIN and WNT can never be both
