On 03/12/2010 Michael Meeks wrote:
We cannot bundle the JRE (as Oracle do)
Wouldn't it be possible to bundle a free Java implementation? I haven't
followed the status of the ongoing efforts toward a free Java recently,
but if it is stable enough and cross-platform (I heard a Mac OS X
version
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
But it is more than clear that those users will then get the This
function requires a JRE notification. This hasn't been a problem in
OOo-land, so why should it be a problem for LO?
Because the default OOo install does include a JRE.
Otherwise, I'm rather indifferent
What fun,
It seems this is rather a polarising question, so of course it makes
sense to pause and think it through some more; here is my attempt to
summarise the major arguments their stake-holders :-)
A. it makes LibreOffice easier to build, to not require Java
+ I made this
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:03 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
A. it makes LibreOffice easier to build, to not require Java
+ I made this point, Spaetz has some examples of build failure
with different Javas / Ant (that speak of much frustration
and
wasted time), Jonathan
