Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (21-02-12 13:03)
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Just to be sure: people eligible to do reviews, are those delivering
code, or solely those with commit access?
I would say a competent developer, and/or someone willing to take the
Anything else that I could do to grow trust, so that maybe Winfrieds patch
can make it to 3.5.3 ?
I pushed it on libreoffice-3.5
it will be there in 3.5.3
Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Cor,
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
least).
:-) it is some great work
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:13)
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
Hi Cor,
On 2012-02-20 at 17:44 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Anyhow - I don't see a special case for bending the rules of triple
reviews, nor a reason to refuse it if it gets that widespread
support :-) it's a nice fix.
Thanks, that sounds encouraging.
As written: going for 3.5.2 means
Hi Kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (20-02-12 18:04)
Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
freeze (I remember the SmartArt
Jan Holesovsky wrote (20-02-12 18:04)
Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
freeze (I remember the SmartArt import).
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Em 14-02-2012 04:44, Winfried Donkers escreveu:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
least).
Winfried
Just a question...
The new schema with
Olivier Hallot wrote (14 februari 2012)
The new schema with the paper size will work with older versions of
LibreOffice and OpenOffice? In other words, if I replace Labels.xcu from
older OOo, with the new one, is it going to break the label feature or
not of OOo?
It will work with 'old style'
Hi Winfried,
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
least).
The problem is that it is partially a feature, and introduces new
strings :-( - so
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least).
Winfried
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
