Hi Kendy,
Yes, I give it a try.
Great, thanks a lot! :-)
Well, I said I'm interested in this cleanup, but just until it is not too
far from my tasks. :)
I used NumericBox to derive from it while implementing LimitBox and I'd
like to allow the user adding values unlimitedly, so the only limit
On 03/22/2013 11:44 AM, Zolnai Tamás wrote:
Otherwise in ImplNumericGetValue() the problem of overflow/underflow can
be avoid with these lines
sal_Int64 nValue = aStr.toInt64()
if( OUString::valueOf(nValue) != aStr )
{
if( bNegative )
rValue = SAL_MIN_INT64;
else
2013/3/22 Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com
On 03/22/2013 11:44 AM, Zolnai Tamás wrote:
Otherwise in ImplNumericGetValue() the problem of overflow/underflow can
be avoid with these lines
sal_Int64 nValue = aStr.toInt64()
if( OUString::valueOf(nValue) != aStr )
{
if( bNegative )
On 03/22/2013 02:50 PM, Zolnai Tamás wrote:
From that matter, why is that the toInt64() function doesn't pay
attention on overflow/underflow? Maybe it would simpler to handle these
flows in that function.
Yes, letting the toIntegral functions return zero in case of overflow,
similarly to the
Hi Tamás,
Zolnai Tamás píše v St 20. 03. 2013 v 22:33 +0100:
Yes, I give it a try.
Great, thanks a lot! :-)
I think the mentioned multiplication is in
MetricField::ConvertDoubleValue(), which not need to change, as I see.
So whenever we are converting to and from double, there is the risk
Hi Tamás,
Zolnai Tamás píše v Po 18. 03. 2013 v 17:56 +0100:
And the problem was found in this function, in line 199:
double nValue = rtl::OUString(aStr).toDouble();
In general the NumericBox store its data in an sal_Int64 variable, but
here this OUString-double conversion cause changes
Hi Kendy,
2013/3/20 Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz
Hi Tamás,
Zolnai Tamás píše v Po 18. 03. 2013 v 17:56 +0100:
And the problem was found in this function, in line 199:
double nValue = rtl::OUString(aStr).toDouble();
In general the NumericBox store its data in an sal_Int64 variable,
Hi Tamás,
Zolnai Tamás píše v Pá 15. 03. 2013 v 13:39 +0100:
I'm working with NumericBox nowadays and I recognised a problem
belong to it. This class is a ComboBox which allows only numeric
values. It use sal_Int64 for store its value but use double conversion
internal for remformating.
Hi All,
.
I'm working with NumericBox nowadays and I recognised a problem belong to
it. This class is a ComboBox which allows only numeric values. It use
sal_Int64 for store its value but use double conversion internal for
remformating. The problem is that this concept allows adding such
