On 17 November 2012 23:04, Matúš Kukan matus.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been gbuildizing cairo but then realized it's used only for linux
[1], as also cairo/README says.
Though there are many platform conditionals in various cairo related
makefiles. Maybe it was used more in the past ?
So
Matus I am not sure if the work you have been doign has resulted in the
issue I am seeing on mac, but i am using the disable autogen.sh switch for
cairo yet for me my build is still failing and suggesting that cairo coudl
be the cause along with some other modules in cppunit module. Is this
2012/11/20 Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com:
Matus I am not sure if the work you have been doign has resulted in the
issue I am seeing on mac, but i am using the disable autogen.sh switch for
cairo yet for me my build is still failing and suggesting that cairo coudl
be the cause along
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Why not ? There are so many gtk-applications running fine in KDE.
IMHO (not an KDE-user so didn't check it), the l+f will be just
like Qt.
I doubt that. Also there's more KDE platform integration than just
the GUI. As long as there's someone actively maintaining that
Hi Enrico,
Dropping VCL and moving to something else is a gargantuan task. It is
worth discussing -only- if we can do it completely, and the target
toolkit meets all the platform, licensing, maturity and feature
requirements we have. As far as I know as of today, no non-VCL toolkit
does
Hi,
[1] used in:
- vcl/Library_vclplug_svp : ifeq ($(GUIBASE),unx)
- vcl/Library_vclplug_gtk : ENABLE_GTK
- canvas/Library_cairocanvas : ENABLE_CAIRO_CANVAS
e.g. for Library_cairocanvas there are also WNT... conditionals in
the
makefile but configure says:
if test $_os = Darwin -o $_os =
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Enrico Weigelt enrico.weig...@vnc.biz wrote:
At that point, I'd also raise the question whether we really need
different widget toolkits (even on the same platform). Can't we,
at least on *nix, choose one crossplatform widget toolkit (I'd
personally would
Hi,
and kde user would have gtk widget when using LO ?
Why not ? There are so many gtk-applications running fine in KDE.
IMHO (not an KDE-user so didn't check it), the l+f will be just
like Qt.
Why would you consider that kde and gtk are the same 'platform' and
Mac and Windows are not from
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Enrico Weigelt enrico.weig...@vnc.biz wrote:
By the way: anybody working on porting the gtk or qt vcl to win32 or mac ?
If you mean if gtk/qt programs run on Windows, yes, they do and look
pretty native. The only problem with GTK is that the newest official
Hi,
If you mean if gtk/qt programs run on Windows, yes, they do and look
pretty native. The only problem with GTK is that the newest official
GTK version for windows is 2.24.10 as they seriously lack Windows
developers, so there is no one to make a 3.x version.
On Mac, GTK was really buggy,
10 matches
Mail list logo