Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translation of comments from German to English (no. 8)

2010-10-07 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:53 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote: translation into English Committed, with thanks ! :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 00/18] [tree: writer] remove bogus comments

2010-10-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Prashant, On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 22:36 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote: These are patches to writer tree This is some great work :-) the code starts to look much less cluttered, thanks for that ! As Norbert says - making the mailing-list look less cluttered by merging many patches

Re: [Libreoffice] Error Building, vcl segmentation fault

2010-10-12 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 08:26 +0200, David Tardon wrote: There is the problem: this line should be gdb --args $checkdll $@ Urk - my problem; you almost got there manually with: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 23:08 +0200, julien wrote: (gdb) run -s ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/check_libvclplug_kdeli.so

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/1] Cleanup: remove bogus comments from misc directory

2010-10-12 Thread Michael Meeks
Pushed - thanks ! :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/1] Cleanup: remove bogus comments from shells directory

2010-10-12 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Prashant, On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 23:09 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote: This patch removes bogus comments found in the shells directory including empty Beschreibung (translation: description) statements Again - thanks :-) I like your style too, normalising to a single line of whitespace

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/1] Cleanup: remove bogus comments from frmdlg directory

2010-10-12 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 22:33 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote: This patch removes bogus comments found in the frmdlg directory including empty Beschreibung (translation: description) statements Again, lovely - pushed :-) Thanks, Michael. --

Re: [Libreoffice] Error Building, vcl segmentation fault

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rene, On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 19:54 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:13:15PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: On Tuesday 12 of October 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: Having said that - it looks like this may be some horrendous compatibility problem between the internal

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Filters - Remove unnecessary #ifdef PCH comments

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Graeme, On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:31 +0100, jgraeme wrote: Patch to remove unused #ifdef PCH and comments, Wonderful - thanks :-) [ wonder why they were still there ] Pushed, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Re: [Libreoffice] Script used to change the product codes

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Fridrich, On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:12 -0600, Fridrich Strba wrote: I run the script on the relevant code*.txt files in instsetoo_native and I reverted all stuff that concerns BrOffice back, since its product code was distinct from OOo product code. IMHO - we just want to bin that

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] cppcheck fixes under libs-core

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Harri, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 19:01 +0300, Harri Pitkänen wrote: - unopage.cxx and unoshap2.cxx: remove redundant null checks for pointers that have already been checked for null value - odma_datasupplier.cxx: fix memory leak if NODMQueryExecute returns with error Nice looking

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] SAL_N_ELEMENTS changes for libs-core

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kayo, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 09:18 -0700, Kayo Hamid wrote: SAL_N_ELEMENTS changes for libs-core A really nice cleanup, carefully done :-) thank you ! Pushed, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Re: [Libreoffice] Improving the build experience in rawbuild

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 09:31 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: * Change the rawbuild/configure.in to have the defaults matching the options defined in distros-config/LibreOfficeLinux.conf.in What about Mac? What about Windows? Hum... You're right! Any better idea to have

Re: [Libreoffice] Some questions about the difference between LO to go-oo.

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Nadav, On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:00 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: Without the change name/website I don't notice any changes. Well - that's not really so, we have: * a different, flattened code-base + [ yes we have some legacy patches still but they

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/3] Translate German comments in ure/xml2cmp

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Laurent, Many thanks for the three nice patches :-) just pushed them. All the best, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie dev question: no rawbuild directory after git clone

2010-10-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Terrell, On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 20:07 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: I'm attempting to get a proper development environment to build LibreOffice. Pulled a clone of the git repository, and it looks like I have everything except for the loroot/rawbuild directory. Problem: looks like

Re: [Libreoffice] Dynamic arrays in chartitempool

2010-10-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rene, On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 15:30 +0200, René Kjellerup wrote: Okay I've now a beginning of a build of chart2 and I've added: #include sal/macros.h To the file, but the compilation says that the file is not found, Strange, I add it and it is fine: ---

Re: [Libreoffice] Translation of comments (no. 12)

2010-10-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andreas, On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 18:17 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote: i have get some time to translate comments to English. Thanks ! pushed :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][PATCH] compiler warnings inftxt.hxx

2010-10-16 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 01:01 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: some shadows a member of 'this' and unused parameter warnings. Great :-) though compile warnings in binfilter are less problematic than elsewhere, since it is known-awful, legacy code that most people don't use. But I've pushed it

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Julio, On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 17:58 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: My first time contributing with an open source project. I hope to help with a little. Wow - this is a great first contribution ! :-) Patch2: Cleanup comments and some formatting. So - I had a good go at

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removed a lot of dead code and bogus comments

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:06 +0300, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: I've done some work on entry level tasks. Specifically, I've removed all #if 0 blocks in the LibreOffice source tree. Wow. Also, a lot of bogus comments like /*N*/, /*?*/ and so on were removed. Ok -

Re: [Libreoffice] 3rd week development summary

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Petr, On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:52 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: again a brief summary of what happened the 3rd week on LibreOffice repos: Are we including commits to the 'build' module ? Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removed a lot of dead code and bogus comments

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:06 +0300, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: I've done some work on entry level tasks. Specifically, I've removed all #if 0 blocks in the LibreOffice source tree. So - I did some more review; I left a few useful / commented pieces in that were removed, but so

Re: [Libreoffice] Changing patches

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thomas, On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:43 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: One of the issues I see is in SampleICC, where Vetters.cpp includes errno.h on Solaris and sys/errno.h on all other non-Windows. riight - hmm. On NetBSD, it also needs to include errno.h to compile. I could add an

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] SAL_N_ELEMENTS for ure

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:50 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: this patch replaces all occurrences of sizeof.*/.*sizeof.*\[ with SAL_N_ELEMENTS in ure Thanks - there were a few sillies in there: #include sal/macro an ommitted include, and one other build-break I

Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

2010-10-21 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 09:40 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: The attached patch makes compilation for this file work for me. I still haven't finished a complete build, so I hope it doesn't trip up somewhere else. Could someone please test it on a complete build? /* the macro

Re: [Libreoffice] ODF thumbnailer for win32/osx

2010-10-23 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 16:09 +0200, Jon Nordby wrote: My motivation is actually to get OpenRaster[1] thumbnail support on mentioned platforms (it uses ODF compatible thumbnails). 1. http://create.freedesktop.org/wiki/OpenRaster Oh - cool :-) Well - I guess we would love to

Re: [Libreoffice] How can I speed up a build?

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Mattias, On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 13:15 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: it seems that everything is rebuilt which takes hours, even if only a few files have changed. As Norbert says - this may be down to low-level header changes, which have a big trickle-down effect on build-times

[Libreoffice] oox compile failure ...

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
I just got this: Compiling: oox/source/ppt/timenodelistcontext.cxx Making:ppt.lib Compiling: oox/source/ppt/dgmimport.cxx In file included from /data/opt/OpenOffice/HEAD/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/oox/source/ppt/dgmimport.cxx:31:0: ./../inc/oox/ppt/dgmimport.hxx:63:52: error: conflicting

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH] remove pam in security

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Nadav, On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: Notice that I leave: Thank for your patch :-) I removed the whole contents of osl_psz_loginUser - as is done for several other Unix's. It would be great as a follow-on patch to prune the contents of osl_loginUser as well in

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH] remove pam from config

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:06 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: While autogen.sh complete successfully with this patch, the make didn't, there still pam configuration related in the code. last patch work and make finish compilation. Great. So; I've pushed your outer configure.in

Re: [Libreoffice] damaged file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:32 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: Yes, I'm aware I can change the CPU count, among other things, but this was my noob starting point. Wow, this *really* makes a difference. I would have thought it might have halved the time, to about 2 hours. On the same hardware,

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kevin, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: The short answer is no, I'm not scared of all future versions, but on principal, I will not blindly trust a document that I (no one!) have yet to see. Fair enough :-) We're still thinking this through I guess. How

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problem on windows 7

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 09:09 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: This is mostly a guess, but are you running the build as Administrator (you shouldn't) If this is the problem - we should probably detect in configure and fail early, if we don't already ;-) Regards,

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:37 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: My ideal is to have neither an enable or disable flag for any of the optional pieces: KDE3 / KDE4 / GNOME etc. - but have a default of auto-detection, so we only build if they are there. I disagree. Even if you had

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi John, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 06:15 -0700, John Lee Castle wrote: First try at this ... single vcl patch attached. Great - thanks :-) Fixed unit conversion table initialization so there are no more compiler warnings and no more zero entries... Good catch. Relevant changes

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH] remove pam in security

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:56 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: yes, although I may ask later more explanation (I don't see the code at this moment) cd clone/ure git grep osl_login And you'll see the places left to cleanup :-) Thanks, Michael. --

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] First try

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:03 +0200, Gert Faller wrote: Ok, then a second try. Perfect; no attachment - but I committed the last one with your full name :-) Thanks ! Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Easy Task - systray build progress tracker

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Luke, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 23:21 +0100, Luke Dixon wrote: I thought I would try one of the easy tasks and the zenity systray one seemed the most fun for me to look at. After getting it working I figured I needed to also add it to the configure system Cool :-) you did indeed get

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal is now merged in master

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Norbert, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:40 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: After a heroic review by kendy, the vos-removal branch has been merged into master and is being pushed as I type :-) Congratulations ! great work. - there are a bunch of xml file related to uno service description

Re: [Libreoffice] credits page is 403 access forbidden

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:41 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: The current Help menu-about-credits points to http://libreoffice.org/credits.html That is bad :-) which gives you a 403 Access forbidden when accessing. We shouldn't keep our list of contributors that secret

Re: [Libreoffice] damaged file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kevin, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:59 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: Does distclean not remove the ccache files? Both times, I ran 'make distclean, bin/g pull -r, ...' No it does not remove them; this is because ccache is thought to be 100% 'safe' - ie. if the flags, compiler version,

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Building on windows 7-64bit with Visual Studio 2010 Express

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Martin, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 13:14 +0100, Martin Gallwey wrote: Sorry, better patch attached - is this the right list for this kind of thing? Now that I've actually read the appropriate wiki page about how to Thanks for the patch, just pushed it (or at least the version from

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Fix for installer::languages::shorten_language_string()

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sean, On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 02:24 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Please note that your earlier MD5::Digest patch was reverted, though, because it was causing problems Right - it was breaking existing includes of Digest::MD5 at least on my system. Quite possibly this is because I first

Re: [Libreoffice] Image Compression Patch

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andrew, On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:49 +0100, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: Thanks again for checking so deeply. Sorry, I should have been clearer on these images... These are the green (/red) crosses that have long existed as icon placeholders. Ah ! ;-) out of interest, how many of these

Re: [Libreoffice] the basic macro editor

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 21:39 +0200, René Kjellerup wrote: Very understandable then, I've had build issues since the 17th... Nasty - can we help out with them ? perhaps the solver is out of sync somehow - Norbert's recommendation to remove build/libreoffice/solver in its entirety may

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Niko, On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 02:41 +0300, Niko Rönkkö wrote: I think that it would be best to name all options consistently like: I like the idea of consistent naming; though we need to make sure that all the distro packagers at least get notified so they can change their .spec files,

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] Easy Task - systray build progress tracker

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 19:00 +0100, Luke Dixon wrote: Thanks, that makes sense. I saw the other commits by people that fixed what I had broken, I'm very sorry for any trouble I've caused. Hah - all my fault for not testing more widely, but Jesus helped out we got there in the end. I

Re: [Libreoffice] Image Compression Patch

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andrew, On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:08 +0100, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: Ah ! ;-) out of interest, how many of these do we have still ? From a quick count, only ~150 or so... (!) Nice - only 150 duplicated icons. I've added an easy hack for this, we should fix in the code first [ it

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Filters - Clean up some comments in binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/unocore/

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, Pushed :-) [ sorry for the delay ] Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Enable testtool (and possibly other stuff) to run with LibO

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Guiseppe, On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 21:31 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote: the following patch should allow testtool to run with LibO. Did your patch(es) get merged ? if not that sucks, sorry - just working back through my mail. They look good to me - but for me the testtool runs

Re: [Libreoffice] Tar / Zip wobbly

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 13:10 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: To put a different spin on your surprise, I've wondered for awhile why it *isn't* installed in the default installation of more desktop-based nix distros. For me, the nicest bit of zip is the un-compressed, find-able, directory

[Libreoffice] UX opportunity ... / Easy Hacks

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christoph, ( and any other UX gurus out there :-) Hi guys; I'd -love- to get a number of easy hacks - ie. small fixes - that can be made to our ergonomics into the page here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Easy_Hacks These are entry level tasks for people

[Libreoffice] regression tests - for word count ...

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 14:42 -0700, LeMoyne wrote: Using the following sample from a git patch one can see one way in which the current counting method comes up with fewer words than other methods do. +1747,9 Well - this is fun indeed :-) I strongly suggest that we start to

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD patch #1

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 11:27 +0200, Robert Nagy wrote: env bash is needed since not every system has it in /bin (that basically includes everytihng except linux, mac and solaris?) Cool - so it seems we reached consensus; Lets go with env bash everywhere instead. As for the csh

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Dev-install failed

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rene On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 19:45 +0200, René Kjellerup wrote: located the call to perl -d:DProf -w and removed the profiling declare if you think the profiling at every build is redundant Thanks - pushed your patch :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com

Re: [Libreoffice] Image Compression Patch

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 20:15 +0100, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: Sounds like a good plan of attack. I've added some stats to the wiki based on an analysis I did a while ago. Nice. There's some other possible hacks in the analysis here:

Re: [Libreoffice] Help concerning code style and documentation

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Regina, On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:13 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: I'm currently working on LINEST and have attached a draft to issue Cool ! this is an awesome patch :-) There is no mathematical problem, but I'm uncertain about coding style. And your coding style looks

Re: [Libreoffice] First build error: segmentation fault on vcl

2010-10-29 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Dave, On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 13:54 -0700, Dave Lacy Kusters wrote: I tried tracking down the generation of the linker paths, but got bogged down in the details. Then, I tried --without-stlport. That got me different errors, so I switched gears and tried --disable-kde and --disable-kde4.

[Libreoffice] dpslo / compile poisoning ...

2010-10-29 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, I had a fun problem with calc just now that was quite revealing. I added a file (to test Regina's nice code) to calc's makefile.mk, and it compiled the dpslo. Then I removed that file from the makefile.mk - yet it still built: echo #error an error

Re: [Libreoffice] How to write debug output to console or file?

2010-10-29 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:59 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:52 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: The problem here is to get a C string from them: here are some examples: * from OUString: rtl::OUStringToOString( sOUStr, RTL_TEXTENCODING_UTF8 ).getStr()

Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir?

2010-10-29 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 19:34 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Jani Monoses píše v Pá 29. 10. 2010 v 17:49 +0300: This page describes building in the topmost dir http://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/ whereas the wiki-page example changes to rawbuild before. Which one is recommended? I

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Bogus comments, commented lines removed and some comments translated.

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Robert, On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 20:26 +0200, Roth Robert wrote: Attached you'll find 4 patches, colicensed with LGPLv3+, GPLv3+ and MPL, with some bogus comments removed containing only changed date, some commented lines removed, and some german comments translated. I hope this is the right

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] Fix comments in filters/xmerge

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Nigel, On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 16:16 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: Well, since the first lot worked, a few more patches on the same lines. Thanks :-) lots of nice cleanups; pushed ... Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Re: [Libreoffice] Icons

2010-11-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Joseph, On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:15 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: I'm a little crazy, but I want to work on the icon issues. Cool - there is a rich seam of wasted run-time memory, startup-time, and worse bloat in the Win32 packages here, all of which can be easily fixed I think :-)

Re: [Libreoffice] ./download doesn't work behind a proxy

2010-11-03 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Marc, On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 10:06 +0100, Marc-Oliver Straub wrote: ./autogen.sh --without-git Then ./download uses http. Would be nice to see this on the developers page at http://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/ Ah - indeed; but this will build quite an old version, that

Re: [Libreoffice] regression tests - for word count ...

2010-11-03 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi LeMoyne, On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 23:35 -0700, LeMoyne wrote: [PATCH] Fixes char overcount when selection ends in middle of word Patch in sw changes only one object: sw/source/core/txtedt.cxx .. The paragraph count is held on the same DocStat record as the word and char counts and is

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java

2010-11-03 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Another even wilder idea would be to translate the Java bytecode to .NET bytecode for the Windows case... I suspect at this point the external pundits start screaming all at once ;-) So - I would prefer using python, or native

Re: [Libreoffice] German Translations in Writer module

2010-11-03 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 01:22 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: most part of it was machine translation as I had mentioned :) Heh :-) that's no problem - a lot of it is common sense translation anyway - we swing between comments in German, and comments of staggering obviousness:

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

2010-11-04 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: Making:all_mig.dpslo Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx /home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215:44: error: no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

Re: [Libreoffice] New credits page up (and linked from TDF)

2010-11-04 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:26 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: New iteration of http://libreoffice.org/credits.html in case you want to show your name on that page to your grandmothers. Cool :-) Anything else that you want to see there? I was told the pretty contributor

Re: [Libreoffice] Icon/Image cleanup

2010-11-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Joseph, On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 03:56 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: Ok, I went ahead and did some high-contrast cleanup work on libs-core. I was able to delete massive amounts of code and configuration items. The main issue I'm having is the masking: Just got back, and started reading

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] High Contrast Cleanup

2010-11-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kami, Did you mean to add a 'Pushed' to the Subject ? :-) [ it looks like you did ] On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 08:30 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: Lovely :o) And indeed, these are some nice changes. Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com ,

Re: [Libreoffice] High Contrast Cleanup

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sebastian, On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:13 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: So who would be able to make sure that we don't bundle the high contrast icons in our buld anymore (and either purge those files or move them to a high contrast theme...) ? Hah ! it is you I guess - you just

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 01:55 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: - I suppose we want to get rid of unpacking of the installation sets for smoketest, and instead use ooinstall directly ;-) This used to work - I wrote the patch myself ;-) having said that it used (AFAIR) the same pass

Re: [Libreoffice] removal of solenv/bin/converttags.pl

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 10:40 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: In solenv/bin/ we have converttags.pl which does nothing but going through the source, replacing [TITLE] and [PRODUCTNAME] tags which don't occur at all in our source code, so I believe this script is obsolete. Seems like

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

2010-11-12 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Patrick, On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 23:30 -0800, Patrick Bakker wrote: SEMI-COLON INSTEAD OF COMMA AS FUNCTION ARGUMENT SEPARATOR Kohei (or was it Jody) fixed this many moons ago; I believe the default is set to improve usability here in LibreOffice; I too fell over this as my first step

Re: [Libreoffice] SvxHyperlinkDlg still used?

2010-11-12 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, as a Hyperlink *toolbar*. ;- Go to View - Toolbars - Hyperlink Bar to enable a new toolbar to allow some sort of quick insertion of URL buttons. That toolbar

Re: [Libreoffice] Icon/Image cleanup

2010-11-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Ace, On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 23:56 +, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: Firstly - thanks for tackling this 'feature'. Great stuff! Really excited about seeing this in a future release. I have a few points to make, but will try to be brief: And thanks for your input too :-) I tend to agree

Re: [Libreoffice] Tab rename in Calc

2010-11-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andy / Jonathan, On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 09:52 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Andy Brown wrote: I would like to make a request for Calc. When a 'sheet' is copied, why not have the rename box open like the double click? Can you explain the

Re: [Libreoffice] compile-time trickery to detect misuse of SAL_N_ELEMENTS, RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM, etc.

2010-11-15 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 20:21 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Unless I'm failing to see the obvious I wouldn't have a problem with using boost in sal and friends, assuming we stick to the vast majority of boost that don't require linking against specific boost libs. Sounds reasonable to

Re: [Libreoffice] Tab rename in Calc

2010-11-16 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 18:11 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: basically implement similar functionality like in excel where you can double click on the tab to rename it with a name that a user can understand. instead of sheet 1 etc Oh - so, currently if you double-click the sheet tab,

[Libreoffice] presenterconsole in writer ? ...

2010-11-16 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, Was just looking at the pmap output of LibreOffice on windows, and was somewhat startled to discover that we are linking the presenter console extension, even when we start only writer: which seems somewhat amazing, and might point to a deeper performance problem. Any

Re: [Libreoffice] STAR_RESOURCEPATH env variable

2010-11-18 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 15:32 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: in /libs-gui/tools/source/rc/resmgr.cxx we load resource files either from $OOO_BASE_DIR/program/resource or from the path specified in the env variable STAR_RESOURCEPATH. Is it save to assume that this is a historical leftover that I

Re: [Libreoffice] libreoffice Uebersetzung

2010-11-18 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 00:28 -0300, wer...@guyane.yi.org wrote: Hallo :-) It's great to see you getting helped out by our German speaking community. But in general it allows more people to benfit from the replies to your questions (and to help you out) if you use

Re: [Libreoffice] Examing unicode strings in gdb (while debugging LibO)

2010-11-18 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 09:30 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: See also scratch/writer/gdbinit-cbosdo in build.git. :) Without checking myself, are those pu macros horrifically slow or speedy ? I vaguely recall trying something like that before, and got whacked by astonishingly slow output.

Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:18 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: Well remove it from the menu then. It needs to be there; go read the LGPLv3 :-) Personally, I love the LGPL - so, having it five times could be a feature ;-) Having said that it does seem somewhat excessive. Having

Re: [Libreoffice] newish to git: howto recover from bad merge?

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kevin, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 03:11 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: It usually happens after I've committed a change to my local repository, that I then sent in as a patch. That patch got applied with a slight modification, and then the conflict. Grief - what a pain; sorry about that

Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: Re: cppcheck : snprintf size is out of bounds

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Julien, On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 22:44 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: The bug on cppcheck has been fixed : https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/commit/66c2825b2309d21474b22eb4e73e75a4b4ee150f Nice work :-) great to see the cleanup of LibO's twistedness having a positive effect on shared

Re: [Libreoffice] setting ulimit before running soffice

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:57 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: What's the story with the ulimit set in 'ooenv' right before running a freshly built LO: As Caolan says - without this, your app will simply not dump core. Of course, mostly people can run under gdb just fine, and core files can

Re: [Libreoffice] RFE: abolish memory settings

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 09:30 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: I hate the options dialog in general :), but one thing that has always confused the heck out of me is the memory settings and I propose that could be a nice project for someone: :-) Sounds good to me. HOW am I

Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:53 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: - Module readlicense_oo needs to be modified to not produce them. Patch is in git (and reverted again). oh - shame - why reverted ? - Module scp2 needs to be modified to not copy them. Patch is in git (and reverted

[Libreoffice] git via http ...

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Marc, On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 10:16 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: sorry, freedesktop git is only available via native git protocol - So - we now have a public http version (thanks to Tollef) - and it is here: git clone http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/build.git/

Re: [Libreoffice] crash report and Oracle url

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:33 +, Andrew wrote: I might have a go if you can give me some way to invoke the crash report detector - so I can see what it looks like. We need more crashes ! [ there's an app for that ;-]. You could (I guess) try killing soffice.bin thusly: pkill

Re: [Libreoffice] High Contrast Cleanup

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 23:46 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: Copying them over would mean, our download tarballs qould bloat by another 10 MB or so only transiently, until we remove the duplicates. ( I guess git would be able to handle that efficiently though). Sure,

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 07:57 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: hello, rm -rf * ./download Oh - that is going to waste a -lot- of time ;-) Just remove the build output, not the ( pristine ) git repos. 'make clean' should do that in the top-level.

Re: [Libreoffice] [LO 3.3.0b3] Enable experimental (unstable) features?

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:43 -0800, NoOp wrote: No answers for this on the user list, so I'll ask here: .. Tools|Options|LibreOffice|General: - Enable experimental (unstable) features Does anyone know what this enables? Certainly ! :-) It enables in-line formula

Re: [Libreoffice] Location of SfxPoolItem.Type() method

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Mattias, On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 00:21 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: I've been trying to fix a bug in the search and replace code, and after a bit of hacking have discovered that in findattr.cxx there's a function Nice work :-) If I'm understanding things correctly, and I may not

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Beta 3

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi David, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 18:54 -0500, David Burleigh wrote: I am running LibreOffice Beta 3 under Ubuntu 10.10 (64-bit) and it seems to gradually bog down with use, so that I have to exit and restart it several times a day. It gets so that cursor movement is very slow. This was also a

Re: [Libreoffice] Discuss Easy_Hacks: Remove Sheet From File?

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Joe, On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 03:53 +, Joe Smith wrote: Is this the place to discuss this proposal? I don't see any discussion on the wiki page itself. Yes - sounds reasonable. I, for one, find Insert Sheet From File a useful shortcut for importing data from a text file, and

Re: [Libreoffice] git via http ...

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 00:20 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: Hmm, I don't want to question you You should ! ;-) but maybe that's not really necessary. Quite right; configure will 'guess' this from the build/ clone as you say - it is already there. Thanks; removed,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >