Hi,
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 09:22:20AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
and apt-get listed many packages to be installed including several ones
related to mono. Is it really necessary ? Indeed I am not sure if Ubuntu
No
OpenOffice.org is representative of what is needed to build LibO
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:13:15PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 12 of October 2010, Michael Meeks wrote:
Having said that - it looks like this may be some horrendous
compatibility problem between the internal stlport and the system
version - but we'll need to chase that down.
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:45:57PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
I think about what package names and paths use for the openSUSE
LibreOffice packages. I wonder how they should conflict with the
universal Linux Libre Office build and what they should share with it.
I think that there are
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:55:40AM -0600, Fridrich Strba wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
2. user configuration:
+ ~/.libreoffice/3 - used by the universal linux build
+ ~/.libreoffice/3-distro - proposed alternative
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:46:25PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
This patch (in the top level build dir) makes the development system
compile with KDE4 switched on and KDE3 switched off.
That sounds reasonable.
ACK.
My ideal is to have neither an enable or disable flag for
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:11:07AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
caolanm-rene: Think we should use AS_HELP_STRING everywhere ?
Yeah. Good idea. Sounds like a easy hack :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:24:37PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
diff --git a/solenv/inc/unitools.mk b/solenv/inc/unitools.mk
index 6bf0653..c6055d1 100644
--- a/solenv/inc/unitools.mk
+++ b/solenv/inc/unitools.mk
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ PERL*=perl
TYPE=cat
CDD=cd
COPY=cp -f
-.IF
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:32:08PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
The Subject says everything, not to mention that gunzip will always
decompress, so there is no need for -d.
Pushed, thanks.
Grüße/Regards,
René
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:02:12PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
Attached some diffs to make LibreOffice boostrap on OpenBSD.
Thanks, added/pushed.
Grüße/Regards,
René
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:36:08PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
-if test z$BUILD_WIN32 = z -a z`uname -s` != zSunOS -a z`uname -s`
!= zDarwin; -a z`uname -s` != zOpenBSD; then
+if test z$BUILD_WIN32 = z -a z`uname -s` != zSunOS -a z`uname -s`
!= zDarwin -a z`uname -s` != zOpenBSD; then
Thanks,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:44:18AM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
Yeah I could but now it's easier for the commiter just to copy it.
Actually, no, git format-patch would be easier here, too.
a) it already has the right author (I neeeded to add --author manually)
b) it already had all the files
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:50:26AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:44:18AM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
Yeah I could but now it's easier for the commiter just to copy it.
Actually, no, git format-patch would be easier here, too.
a) it already has the right author (I
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:16:37AM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
diff --git a/set_soenv.in b/set_soenv.in
index 834bd34..79e79bd 100644
--- a/set_soenv.in
+++ b/set_soenv.in
@@ -1369,12 +1369,16 @@ elsif ($platform =~
m/linux|netbsd|osf1|aix|freebsd|openbsd/)
{ $SOLARLIB =
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:34:27PM +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Java source codes in tests of LO/OOo use the annotation feature of JUnit 4,
imported with namespace org.junit.*, which JUnit 3.x lacks. So its version
is worth checking out.
Yes, but they are unreliable anyway, so even me who
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:38:42PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
On the other hand, I've already looked at configure.in, and if you ask
for system cppunit it just assumes it's there. I've already modded that
This is not true:
dnl ===
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:55:44PM +0800, David Nelson wrote:
I'm just giving you a heads-up because I was contacted by�Jason Warner of
Canonical ([1]jason.war...@canonical.com�and�jasoncwarner on Freenode)
And because of this you spam this list with a unsolicited job offer?
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0800, David Nelson wrote:
Well, I did not think of it as *spamming* as such, because it concerns
It's a unsolicited commercial mail. And bulk because it's on a ml which gets to
many people. That perfectly fits the definition of spam.
Grüße/Regards,
René
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22:09PM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
It welcomes corporate participation, e.g. by sponsoring individuals to
work as equals alongside other contributors in the community.
Yes.
Come and join us! Subscribe to our mailing lists and support us with
your skills!
How
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:10:02PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
This is a *single* email (aplified by the list, yes), sent to a bunch of
Wrong. disc...@documentfoundation.org got one too. So two mails,
amplified by two lists.
And on TDF list, it is *not* LibO-related.
Grüße/Regards,
René
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:51:55PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Either we can merge the entire libreoffice-3-3 there, or we can merge
just ooo/OOO330_m14, and continue cherry picking between master and
libreoffice-3-3.
+1 for merging libreoffice-3-3
branch to master. OTOH - if we
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index b92e597..0b812c2 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -5399,15 +5399,15 @@ if test -n $with_system_icu -o -n
$with_system_libs \
AC_LANG_PUSH([C++])
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:25:49PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
It's not a complete patch, but it documents the requirements for KDE3,
and it adds a test for KDE4. The kde4 test doesn't (can't) easily test
for everything because libsolid doesn't seem to set up pkgconfig :-( but
at least we're
Hi,
did we (intentionally? not intentionally?) break URE compatibility in
LibO 3.3 beta 2 (or earlier)?
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603538 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603549
Grüße/Regards,
René
___
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:40:37AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 11:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
did we (intentionally? not intentionally?) break URE compatibility in
LibO 3.3 beta 2 (or earlier)?
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:02:08PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:50 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
but is that also the case for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603538?
Dunno, doubt it. Do you have the build logs for that version ?
You mean for OOo
- Forwarded message from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@oracle.com
-
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:12:28 +0100
From: Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@oracle.com
To: relea...@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [releases] Minutes for release status meeting from 2010-11-15
Reply-To:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:50:40PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Maybe sb did that quite a while ago, see
c37c9bf77d3ae02fb14b1d053e8c249a584f5e00 of jvmaccess/util/gcc3.map ? Is
that it ?
Maybe, but that commit message doesn't explain why those versions are gone
(and from reading
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
Just keep the plaintext one and kill the odt and
the html ones. They are useless.
That's no true, the odt is used by the menu.
Grüße/Regards,
René
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:22:15PM -0400, werner wrote:
Bei der Installation besteht ferner noch folgendes Problem:
1) Bei bin/ooinstall X fehlt Hinzufuegung derooInBase =
/usr/lib/ooo-3.3 vor X !!!
Falsch. Das geht über --with-oodirname, und das enthält die ganzen
Verzeichnisse.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:08:37PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
hey guys what is being done to get LO into debian so that downstream
It already for almost a month.
ubuntu can get it pulled from the upstream debian repository?
Ask them, not me.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:22:06PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:08:37PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
hey guys what is being done to get LO into debian so that downstream
It already for almost a month.
to make that more precise: first upload to Debian
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:36:50PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Ask them, not me.
If they can't do a simple pull in one month, though they are paid for doing
it and /me
who did already the major work (also at nights!) for it, well..
And I wonder why you ask anyways:
https
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:29:44PM +, Andrew wrote:
If you really want to make something happen, ping someone/ask the
question in #ubuntu-desktop on irc.freenode.net (in the week).
I don't.
I was just answering the OP.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
If they can't do a simple pull in one month, though they are paid for doing
it and /me
who did already the major work (also at nights!) for it, well..
There may be exceptions but I think Ubuntu pulls from sid not from
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:13:49PM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:39:22PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz
wrote:
So you propose to rename rawbuild to bootstrap, when the build-based
method is used, right? As only the distro maintainers are the potential
users
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:10:38AM +, Wols Lists wrote:
On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying
that I had --with-java.
On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with can't find ant
ant was always needed when you enable Java.
(just that the old
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:45:17PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
(without the bogus version dependencies), quicker to compile, and faster
to run (I hope) ;-)
Faste to run? Surely not. Java is only loaded when java-stuff is actually
used.
Actually observations show it does make a
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:32:15PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
I would agree with this. This is my problem with ant - I have java but
not ant installed, it worked for me on the old system, and it now fails.
Then install it?
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 05:51:48PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
The information is there in slightly different form, see the attached
screenshot. The version in libreoffice-build-versions has exactly the
same value as the VERSION in the LIBREOFFICE_VERSION tag.
[...]
What others think? ;-)
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:57:11PM +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Like some other members of the L10n project, I'm not very happy with
the RC1 we provided:
- the Windows multilanguage installer is really a pain when you are
on a slow connexion
Is that really a argument now that most people
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:36:33PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
there is a proposal to use the tag libreoffice-3.3.0.1 instead of
LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as
is. It is more clear and understandable.
Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-rc2?
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:14:58PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
So please not disable it. If you want ship the opensymbol one with
math, and only
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:13:28PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
Version 2.0 has been out there for quite some time, 2.0.1 is well on the
way and as the website
states, the new version is much improved on various ends.
The problem is that the file format upstream encodes the version. Even
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:35:19AM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Ugh - and there's no way of falling back to an older format version?
http://de.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=44128 is where I first
saw it. There's also
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:27:16AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
So 2.0 will even more break... (Besides that it probably will need many
adaptions)
Note that OOo already works on that; see cws hsqldb19. The amount of changes
(and tasks( is quite big, though...
Grüße/Regards,
René
Hi,
I wonder what the rationale for the intrusive help packages change between
rc1 and rc2 is. Without any review apparently (no Signed-Off here). Didn't we
have
a strict policy for that in place for libreoffice-3-3?
I can understand the desire of some people to not include the help in what
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:27:12AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:18:04PM +0800, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to compile LibreOffice
3.3.0.1 on my Debian Lenny x86_64 5.0.6, gcc 4.3.2, glibc 2.7. It
failed at the
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:27:40AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:27:12AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:18:04PM +0800, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I tried to compile LibreOffice
3.3.0.1 on my Debian
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:06:55AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
And PKG_CONFIG is supposed to be broken compared to this ? ;-) I just
read the 100 lines of qt / kde checking in configure.in and was nearly
ill ;-) And to think that almost all of this could all be evaporated
trivially by
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:41:33PM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:07:31 +0100, Ralf Saalmüller
r...@ralf-saalmueller.de wrote:
Is there a way to make a package or to build a deb package? A howto?
It is a little bit of a mess to tell people it will work but you
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 03:15:49AM +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Saturday 29 October 2011 21:30:29 Andreas Radke wrote:
Compiling: vcl/unx/source/dtrans/config.cxx
/build/src/build/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx: In member function 'void
KDEXLib::setupEventLoop()':
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:07:45PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
There are 3 cases for mozilla:
- headers
- mozab
- nsplugin
AFAIK the headers are only used for the nsplugin, so that's actually two cases.
mozab uses a heabvily patched seamonkey anyway and uses those internal(!)
mozilla
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 10/01/12 23:53, Matúš Kukan wrote:
On 10 January 2012 22:41, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote:
argh, there is a SYSTEM_MOZILLA_HEADERS? completely forgot about that,
but i guess in that case changing the header
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:45:38AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
and the headers were always and still are a bug imho.
so how would you build the plugin on windows?
Windows is - as always - the exception.
set, source files are still compiled, but not against the headers in
np_sdk,
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:38:45PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm not sure if Debian configures LO with --with-openldap for a
Because we didn't want to link with Mozilas libldap509.so (which evben
isn't properly SONAMEd) and have a dependency on Mozilla for that.
And that OpenLDAP is
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:22:07PM +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
This is great thanks ! I really hope that one day all our dialogs
will be able to magically adapt to our strings, that will save
everybody's time. Well, I know it's not easy any way.
And I hope some f* day a day will come when
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:59:06PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Rene, could you please review it for libreoffice-3-3 branch?
Looks OK, but why did you leave oo* in? package-ooo still generates it.
Regards,
Rene
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:13:44PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:59:06PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Rene, could you please review it for libreoffice-3-3 branch?
Looks OK, but why did you leave oo* in? package-ooo still generates it.
To answer myself after discussion
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:40:06PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Not trying to hijack the thread here but what is Ubuntu doing about
LO i know its supposed to be part of their next release instead of
OOo, but normally they get packages from upstream Debian, is someone
working on getting it
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:39:31PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:40:06PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Not trying to hijack the thread here but what is Ubuntu doing about
LO i know its supposed to be part of their next release instead of
OOo, but normally
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:13:15AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
My build log says the following in the build:
[...]
cat description.tmp | sed s/UPDATED_PLATFORM/linux_x86_64/
../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/PresenterScreen/description.xml
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:40:09AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
diff --git a/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
b/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
index 696d0e5..9e25e34 100755
--- a/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
+++ b/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ PHONYDESC
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:23:23AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Hi,
1)
When I run ./autogen.sh with --enable-ext-FOO, it complains that
extension is not there and asks me if I have downloaded the -ext
tarball. But
That tarball doesn't exist, really.
This is now the extensions/
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:15:39PM +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
The ArchLinux package does not use the --with-unix-wrapper=foo nor the
new --with-compat-oowrappers switches.
And apparently libreoffice-builds .desktop files and not those from sysui..
* base,calc,impress,draw menu entries are
oops, wrong Cc ;)
- Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org -
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:38:15 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org
To: Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de
Cc: libreoff...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] desktop menu entries broken without
Hi.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:27:05AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
The attached patch uses the db_header shell variable instead to detect
whether a db$vver/db.h has been found and to enable or disable looking
for /usr/include/db.h.
I disagree a bit with that. Ideally configure should
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It is a good idea to track changes, but it is probably a questionable
practice to make changes. I expected LibreOffice to be consistent across
Nonsense. This is OSS.
it). Are there compelling reasons why distributions should
[ fullquoting for discuss@dfs sake. forgot the CC. Not that it matters
much, but anyways. ]
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It is a good idea to track changes, but it is probably
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:58:59PM +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
I got this today:
http://secunia.com/advisories/42927/
*yawns*. No news.
CVE Reference(s) CVE-2010-2935 CVSS available in Customer Area
CVE-2010-2936 CVSS available in Customer Area
Two vulnerabilities have been
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:46:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Already fixed. Don't find the commit anymore, but it was in a ooo-build
patch and got merged over to libs-core (tools) and impress (sd).
See also http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2935 and
http
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:15:12PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
could you please review the attached patch for the libreoffice-3-3
branch?
OK for bin/generate-bash-completion obviously ...
It produces extra /etc/bash_completion_d/ooffice.sh for the compat
stuff. It was the easiest and most
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:31:02PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Please, find attached 2nd version of the fix. What do you think about
it? ;-)
It uses different name for the generated bash function. It works here
for the oo* and lo* wrappers at the same time now.
OK.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:20:45PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On the other hand, I think Andrea is right - my hope is that lots of
the distributions on every platform will converge more onto the
LibreOffice core over time, and require fewer patches, and (perhaps) a
few more
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 07:13:56PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does
still contain patches. (Removing those would be a big
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:01:52PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
I would suggest to remove support for gcj at all. We have got many
gcj-specific bugs that were pretty hard to fix in the past. I strongly
suggest to use OpenJDK if you want a free JRE.
NACK. There's architectures which do not
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 04:59:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:36:35AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
it ships own copies of dozens of standard 3rd-party packages,
standard from the viewpoint of up-to-date Linux distros, that is. Don't
forget
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:36:35AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
And of course, various other Unixes too (although I don't know if we have any
active builders/packagers except for BSDs), on which one can be even les sure
that there are up-to-date standard 3rd-party packages available.
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:01:35PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
been ported to LibreOffice. I know that is indeed the case, but it is
Yes, it is.
embarrassing to not have an authorized information source allowing to
confirm that.
Well, we say we base on OOo 3.3, no?
I don't know what
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:01:35PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Several persons asked me if security fixes implemented in OOo 3.3.0 have
been ported to LibreOffice. I know that is indeed the case, but it is
embarrassing to not have an authorized information source allowing to
confirm
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:24:15PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg
which is not in the system path; perhaps that is some distribution
specific thing (Rene ?).
No, unopkg certainly isn't distro-specific. Any system-wide apppearance
of unopkg (e..g in
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:30:18PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
Hi,
I've fixed my introduced regression:
on master:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=76dcd76509ec0b2078a95f282e09696a8e91cbb0
And with these two attachments for 3-5 and 3-6 branch. Would be nice
if
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 02:53:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
rene@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/LibreOffice/libreoffice-3.5.4/vcl$ diff -u
prj/build.lst prj/build.lst-old
--- vcl/prj/build.lst 2012-06-10 14:59:37.176818073 +0200
+++ vcl/prj/build.lst-old 2012-06-10 14:59:26.024762767 +0200
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 03:37:19PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
please try it without svtools/langhelp.hxx. I think this dep is not
needed at all.
Yes, builds after removing this #include.
Regards,
Rene
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:13:36PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
Hi,
On 06.06.2012 17:20, David Tardon wrote:
I'm using --with-system-libs and was getting linker error:
-lboost_date_time not found after
pull from current master (ucb library).
After installation of this lib it was fixed.
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:45:11PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 17:25 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Just as an hint. Ubuntu/Debian would use something like:
3.6.0~alpha1
3.6.0~alpha1+daily20120606
3.6.0~beta1
3.6.0.1
I really like it. I would like to
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:53:00PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:45:11PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 17:25 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Just as an hint. Ubuntu/Debian would use something like:
3.6.0~alpha1
3.6.0~alpha1+daily20120606
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 05:38:12PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
Please could someone sign this for inclusion in libreoffice-3-5 and 3-6?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2432083b50ea7481247c303187bb3922714f93d5
Cherry-picked to -3-6.
Signed-off from me for -3-5, too...
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Maybe it is better to just let check target depend on build target ?
No?
Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
necessary for tests and nothing more ?
Well, make check is for after a successful build to check
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 01:51:56PM -0700, julien2412 wrote:
Hello,
On pc Debian x86-64, compilation failed on tail_build with this error :
[ build LNK ] Library/libsdlo.so
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libo/workdir/unxlngx6/CxxObject/sd/source/ui/func/fuediglu.o:
file not recognized:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:14:42PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
I have needed to do some changes to handle the new filelists in LO-3.5,
see
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=d04e30c94a0d041ecd3d68b5fcf7e7c9ba1df735
I don't think this is %config.
Or at least *if* it's
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:35:27PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Or do people use make check with demand to build only what is
necessary for tests and nothing more ?
Well, make
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:51:44PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
I don't think this is %config.
Or at least *if* it's config it should be in /etc. I have it in /var.
But 100% not in /usr :-)
How do you move this file to /var? Is it a hack or a clean solution?
The LO installation is far from
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:39:52PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
with this patch sal/rtl/source/macro.hxx is merged into configure
process and
rtlbootstrap.mk is not generated any more.
arm*)
CPU=R
CPUNAME=ARM
+RTL_ARCH=ARM_EABI
EPM_FLAGS=-a arm
Hi,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:38:55AM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
I was indeed not sure with arm and was told on irc that eabi would be
the right way to go...
Well, oabi is dead and anything shipping right now is eabi, so it wasn't
THAT wrong, but we shouldn't break the stuff, should we?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:18:13PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Fixed now with
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9cabd6afcb424067ef93a43dc77d94d6914e631f
Fold ImpressSdRemote.xcs back into Impress.xcs.
@Rene: This effectively reverts
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:27:21PM +0200, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Java 7 is today the current version, Java 6 is the old one and Java
5 is the ancient one. Does it still make sense to support it in LO
3.7 or even in LO 4.0?
Would it be an option to drop Java 1.5 support
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Miklos Vajna
vmik...@frugalware.org wrote:
I'm attaching a patch that tries to implement this.
I've tested with our (Frugalware) junit jar where the classpath is in
manifest and
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:05:21PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 15:08 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
please review this commit for 3.4 and 3.4.0.
Pushed to -3-4, the -3-4-0 boat sailed a while back. Any chance you can
review and cherry-pick the attached in
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:59:55AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
*Where* do you get that error? Already when running the top autogen.sh
Yes, that's configure, so.. ;)
Or much later, during the actual build? That is not unexpected,
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:14:52PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
When compiling master and installing using make dev-install, I found 2
small errors :
1/ one typo in the comment written on the screen :
Where? :=
Developer installation finished, you can now execute:
cd
1 - 100 of 754 matches
Mail list logo
