Hi,
I am currently cleaning up my mailbox and found this mail that is close to
a year old.
2012/7/17 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
Nice, the updates make it quite a bit more functional. I noticed that most
of the really useful functions are already well on their way to being
implemented.
familiar of differences between LO/AOo, Excel and Oasis ODF 1.2 needs to run
through both lists for a reality check.
Winfried and Eike have been implementing the ODF 1.2 functions throughout.
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Excel
I've started the page. You can find information on the Calc development
page (bottom). Thanks for the guidance, hopefully I (and maybe others) can
complete the list soon and then decide if/when/how to start getting the
most important functions implemented.
Thanks again all,
Joel
On Fri, Jul 13,
Nice, the updates make it quite a bit more functional. I noticed that most
of the really useful functions are already well on their way to being
implemented. Those cube functions...I've never even heard of. Otherwise,
I think the users list was not very accurate, I think he had 25+ functions,
I
Hi,
On Thursday, 2012-07-12 16:20:37 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 23:03 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I tend to agree and disagree. I think that ultimately it could dampen
creativity but we have to consider some of the facts:
Heh - well, there is ongoing work to
Thanks for responding Eike. Summary is that I was bug triaging and came
across a bug that had a list of functions in excel that are currently not
supported in LO. I wanted input from QA and Devs to see what the best
approach is. The options I came up with:
1. Leave excel bugs as is, keep that bug
I closed the bug as INVALID and put a comment on there. I also will move
the list to the wiki, not sure where it's preferred to go or if I'm making
a new wiki page. Thanks for the feedback
Joel
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Wednesday,
Hi Joel,
On Friday, 2012-07-13 09:00:28 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I closed the bug as INVALID and put a comment on there. I also will move
the list to the wiki, not sure where it's preferred to go or if I'm making
a new wiki page. Thanks for the feedback
Please create a new page, i.e.
On 07/12/12 10:35, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Joel Madero schrieb:
I'd like to make a meta bug for functions that Excel has but that aren't
currently supported
Hi,
I am a little waffing. Such a Meta Bug would allow to get some
objective data comparing capabilities of LibO Calc and Excel. But
Hi Joel,
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 23:03 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I tend to agree and disagree. I think that ultimately it could dampen
creativity but we have to consider some of the facts:
Heh - well, there is ongoing work to make us more interoperable. Last I
looked there were some
Hi All,
I'd like to make a meta bug for functions that Excel has but that aren't
currently supported or are problematic in Calc. This stems from FDO 47164:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47164
The user has been nice enough to make a list, I can go one by one and
verify that Calc
Joel Madero schrieb:
I'd like to make a meta bug for functions that Excel has but that aren't
currently supported
Hi,
I am a little waffing. Such a Meta Bug would allow to get some objective
data comparing capabilities of LibO Calc and Excel. But I hate this
staring to excel and the boring
12 matches
Mail list logo
