Dear fellows,
Thanks for a nice discussion with Petr, Rimas, Sophie etc, with Florian's
great help, we now have a much more pretty name for Moztrap :-)
manual-test.libreoffice.org
I have got the stuff updated in Moztrap side today and done a bit of testing
of the new name myself. It looks
Quoting Yifan Jiang yfji...@suse.com:
Dear fellows,
Thanks for a nice discussion with Petr, Rimas, Sophie etc, with Florian's
great help, we now have a much more pretty name for Moztrap :-)
manual-test.libreoffice.org
I have got the stuff updated in Moztrap side today and done a bit of
Am 20.12.2012 12:02, schrieb Yifan Jiang:
In addition, the wiki page needs to update as well, I guess it will be as
simple as changing all vm12.documentfoundation.org to the new name :) I'll
do it later on any way.
I think I got the most links on the wiki. Please check.
--
Grüße
k-j
Hi
klaus-jürgen,
That's fabulous, thanks a lot for your work! ;-)
Best wishes,
Yifan
klaus-jürgen weghorn olo...@sophia-louise.de 12/20/12 8:13 PM
Am 20.12.2012 12:02, schrieb Yifan Jiang:
In addition, the wiki page needs to update as well, I guess it will be as
simple as changing all
2012.03.22 01:00, Pedro rašė:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Register mail just took a while.
Which brings us to the original problem: why doesn't it support OpenID from
the beginning?
In a little over a month, AskLibO already has nearly 600 users. How much
clearer does the message need to be?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:44:46PM -0700, Pedro wrote:
I thought it was what WE (you , me, TDF, the LO project,etc) are missing.
That is already perfectly clear -- as you know we already have a bug for that
-- and thus need no repeating. But punching the codeconductor devs for not
having your
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
That is already perfectly clear -- as you know we already have a bug for that
-- and thus need no repeating. But punching the codeconductor devs for not
having your pet feature in a prerelease of their free (as in
is indeed a wiser option from a privacy point of view...
http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/5323/what-are-the-downsides-of-browserid-compared-to-openid-oauth-facebook
Thoughts?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Can you maybe be on the QA call tomorrrow?
I'm afraid not. 15:00 UTC on any weekday is during my work hours.
I will read the minutes later.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
The first and most important one is: it is behind its own login -- and that
prevents the casual bypasser to get involved and interested. IMHO, we
absolutely need to change that. The testcases should be browsable without a
login
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:45:29AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
But adding it to the easy hacks doesn't it mean that it's off limits to
the usual collaborators
No, it only means that these task do not require a particulary deep knowledge
of some arcane corners of the LibreOffice codebase.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:26:49PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
For the reference:
* I have a Litmus TODO list at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Litmus_TODO. I'd be glad if you
added bugzilla links and missing entries to it. As I've mentioned
before, it would be really nice to maintain
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
I don't know, but it may not make sense to keep improving Litmus at that
point. After all, if they settled for a rewrite, you just have to expect it
to be so much better than the old tool, right? :)
That might be the case --
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
They already have a staging server, but I cant get into it.
Register mail just took a while. I now can walk around in:
https://caseconductor-dev.allizom.org
Its is all looking very nifty and web-2.0-ish. But unlike Litmus, I
:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal-tp3845560p3847106.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
think
this is important
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Maybe we could even throw a limited amount of dedicated funds in that
direction?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal-tp3845560p3847644.html
Sent from the QA
2011.11.03 06:16, Yifan Jiang rašė:
Hi Rimas,
Would you help to look a bit of this bug found by occasion, though I am not
sure if someone else also meets the same problems. The bug may cause most of
IE and Chrome users cannot filter test cases with usually used UI.
17 matches
Mail list logo