Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

2013-01-28 Thread Petr Mladek
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 15:06 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: On 01/26/2013 02:48 PM, Jack Leigh wrote: c) a reminder + automated closing of bug after some period of time +1 Something like automated closing after 3 months in NEEDINFO Response: From developer side, they'll see a MASSIVE influx of

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

2013-01-28 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Petr Mladek schrieb: This will cause many mails only in the first round. It will be normal level of mails if we do this regularly. Hi, That's an illusion, total number of mails will always be the the same. Only the number of mails per cleanup will be smaller. BTW, I dislike the noise the

[Libreoffice-qa] fdo#59916: problems to reproduce basic function erros in Calc import

2013-01-28 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, Markus and me have troubles to reproduce errors when importing Calc documents into the last 4.0.0 builds. See See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59916 Have you seen such a problem, please? Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/25/2013

2013-01-28 Thread Petr Mladek
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 14:27 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: +Assigning Bugs -AGREED: At this time QA team “pushing” bugs to developers isn't working, we will now only do “pull” philosophy (developers choose their own bugs and assign themselves I suggest to add developers into CC for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

2013-01-28 Thread Petr Mladek
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 10:05 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Petr Mladek schrieb: This will cause many mails only in the first round. It will be normal level of mails if we do this regularly. Hi, That's an illusion, total number of mails will always be the the same. Only the number of

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Weird crash of LO 4.0.0 RC2 on starting Python and Java wizards

2013-01-28 Thread Dan Lewis
On 01/28/2013 03:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Hi all, Please, could you try to reproduce the crash I described in the bug report 59931 : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59931 For the moment I am alone who can reproduce this bug ... Best regards. JBF Sorry, but LO

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

2013-01-28 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-01-28 08:13, Petr Mladek a écrit : On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 10:05 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Petr Mladek schrieb: This will cause many mails only in the first round. It will be normal level of mails if we do this regularly. Hi, That's an illusion, total number of mails will always

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links to readme files in all

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Marc Paré
Sorry for the double post. Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

2013-01-28 Thread Pedro
Hi Joel, all jmadero wrote d) a 3 strikes type system - send one reminder, a month later send a second with a warning the bug will be closed, then close the bug +1 but this sounds like a lot of human work... How can you make sure that a reply is noticed (e.g. after first reminder) so that

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/25/2013

2013-01-28 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/28/2013 04:57 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 14:27 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: +Assigning Bugs -AGREED: At this time QA team “pushing” bugs to developers isn't working, we will now only do “pull” philosophy (developers choose their own bugs and assign themselves

[Libreoffice-qa] Request for confirming a bug

2013-01-28 Thread Kohei Yoshida
I have hard time reproducing this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59850 Can someone do a bit more triaging to narrow it down a bit? Thanks, Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Request for confirming a bug

2013-01-28 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On 01/28/2013 10:52 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: I have hard time reproducing this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59850 Can someone do a bit more triaging to narrow it down a bit? And many thanks for those who've chipped in! All the best, Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Request for confirming a bug

2013-01-28 Thread Olivier Hallot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Em 28-01-2013 17:09, Kohei Yoshida escreveu: On 01/28/2013 10:52 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: I have hard time reproducing this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59850 Can someone do a bit more triaging to narrow it down a bit?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Request for confirming a bug

2013-01-28 Thread Olivier Hallot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Resending with more info. Em 28-01-2013 17:09, Kohei Yoshida escreveu: On 01/28/2013 10:52 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: I have hard time reproducing this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59850 Can someone do a bit more triaging to