Hi Rainer,
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 08:21 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
to be honest: I completely lost the overview what's going on to fulfill
what needs.
Well, the code is checked into git; hopefully it can get polished
there, as for whom is working on it, I'm not (currently) ;-)
Hi Julien,
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 08:04 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
I'm taking a look at the bugtracker, base part.
Awesome :-) it'd be great to have more triage, accurate reporting and
interest in base bugs - could you be the base loving hacker hero /
maintainer that the user list is
Hi Bernhard,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:41 +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
Yes, there are some spare cycles. If long tests need to be added, I
could make it schedule them only daily like the extensive mozilla tests.
Wonderful :-) The database bits are a pain to validate without your
Hi Drew,
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 00:57 -0400, drew wrote:
well, kind of - there is a number of features that do not work with ODBC
- so I'm just curious what the reason for using SQLite and ODBC would be
for a test bed?
So - the ideal test code that we have in the build is small,
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 12:36 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Is is supposed for testing of the openSUSE LO packages or
the plain LO build?
The plain build I suggest.
Is the testing automatic or manual?
Automatic via openQA (which is awesome but well hidden ;-)
Also I wonder where
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 11:46 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
today the FDO Bugzilla has been updated to version 4.0.2. Currently
there are no changes, but may be we will try to use advanced features of
this version.
Brilliant news :-) Thanks so much to Tollef for working on this.
Hi guys,
The FOSDEM organisers have kindly agreed to dedicate a developer room
to LibreOffice development at the conference ( book now for 4-5 Feb
2012: http://fosdem.org/2012/ :-)
So - that means we're eager to get -technical- talks (FOSDEM really is
a true hackers conference),
Hi Stephan,
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:50 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=Backport-reading-AES-encrypted-ODF-1.2-documents.patch;h=e6c722598ab05464f09787355b621cbb0aa07c49;hb=e7a803540d408adab3d55fb2ae051ac4be599a72
is a patch
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 20:09 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
there was too big delay before 3.4.5 bugfix release. We decided the
following changes on the last steering call[1]:
So the 3.4.x cycle is made slightly odder by us extending it quite a
bit, to get it better aligned with the rest of
Hi guys,
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 10:25 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
for the upcoming new version 3.5.0, we start with a beta0 build that
likely will have a few rough edges, and is not yet feature-complete.
It is in a bit of a state it seems :-) anyhow - lots of bugs in our
release
Hi Rainer,
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 08:42 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
it's a disaster, completely unusable ! Quality of Beta0 is far behind
quality of Master during the last weeks, it seems that we were not lucky
with the time where the tag has been created
Quite quite :-) so Beta1
Hi Pedro,
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 12:25 +, Pedro Lino wrote:
Is it reasonable to admit that the all current changes in master will
be in Beta1? If so, using master~2011-12-02_22.36.35_libodev35 from
Win-x86@6-fast as a replacement for Beta0 is acceptable?
Yes ! we have not branched
Hi Pedro,
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 20:34 +, Pedro Lino wrote:
E.g. A bug fix such as this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42958
needs to be cherry picked to the 3.4 branch
Seems that Eike picked this to -3-4 shortly after you mentioned it ;-)
of course, if there are more
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 19:53 +, Pedro Lino wrote:
Uninstalled Java 6 rev 29.
Run LO 3.4.4. Executed File, Wizard, Letter. Reported missing Java
Run LOdev 3.5.0 Build ID: f923851-7f15fca-1f1fd1a-ca8e46d-5bcbce4.
Executed File, Wizard, Letter. LOdev crashed.
Gosh; when you say
Hi Winfried,
So - this best belongs on the QA list (which I've CC'd):
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:44 +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote:
There are some bugs in calc that damage formulas/conditional formats
of cells. As this goes further than just being a nuisance I would like
to nominate them
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 08:48 -0800, Pedro wrote:
But the main obstacle IMO is the requirement to have to subscribe to yet
another account. I have suggested elsewhere that OpenID should be adopted as
the default identification method.
I agree.
Most people already have an
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 07:12 -0800, Pedro wrote:
I know this wasn't addressed to me, but here are my thoughts...
I always like to hear your thoughts :-)
First of all RCs: RC releases replace the tester's stable release. I know it
can't be otherwise.
Ok - so this might be a
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 08:20 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
However, in a customized installation (where I removed tons of useless
dictionaries), the user interface of the first invokation is in English
and not in pt-BR.
IIRC, we only install a small subset of the bundled dictionaries on
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 19:00 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
But the positive fact is that acceptance to see regression bugs as Most
Annoying Ones by definition is growing.
Absolutely; so - one of our issues is bad visibility communication
between QA and developers; getting the
Hi Pedro,
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 04:08 -0800, Pedro wrote:
That is because there are fewer developers using the Windows platform and
there are absurdly very few people in QA (and only a fraction on Windows).
Sure, we need to do things to try to grow interest there, clearly the
efforts
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:52 -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
I wonder if it would be a good idea to say, somewhere in the
wiki pages about filing bugs, something like ...
:-) I'm afraid almost everyone thinks that their problem is obvious,
and that we're morons for not seeing it, or for
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 16:16 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Markus has implemented a nice feature that should help keeping the bugs
up to date: whenever you are committing / pushing to git, and you
ooh ! really lovely :-)
Great work Markus !
Michael.
--
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 20:33 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
Is it possible somehow include the information about a target version?
I guess that -should- be implicit in the branch it is committed to, so
- sounds feasible ;-) at least - the expert eye can see that information
there already.
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 19:21 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Name: Translation check of creating a new database
...
* the database wizard open: all strings in the dialog box and
window are correctly localized to your own language.
So - this looks pretty odd to me :-) This
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 22:42 +0100, Luc Castermans wrote:
Related to my previous post:
Ho hum.
- I installed 3.4.5, ran as Administrator
- now Libo starts, but reported JRE was missing
- I installed JRE
Now I re-installed 3.5 rc1 and everthing is fine now.
Hmm.
Appears
Hi Tommy,
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:39 +0100, Tommy wrote:
there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.1.2 tag for 3.5.1-rc2
release.
Hi, is the RC2 going to be released bit-per-bit as 3.5.1 final?
In the absence of any horrors I would expect that :-)
on the release plan page the
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:04 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
Perhaps, if you mean the whole team. But note that there are some
lunatic guys like me, who are interested in bug-fixing ~completely. ;)
Yep - you're a star ! :-)
Thanks Ivan !
Michael.
--
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 21:22 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Actually I was talking about SUSE LibreOffice for Windows (which is
apparently a one-off unsupported release created for the Intel AppUp
store) :)
Nah - SUSE will be maintaining that with our stable release. Though of
course it
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 15:30 -0700, Pedro wrote:
I can't believe that 3.5.2 is going to be released with Slideshow completely
ruined for all Windows users...
:-) lets not conclude that. The purpose of the RC's is to find horrible
bugs that havn't been noticed yet.
This is a regression
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 21:41 +0200, Tommy wrote:
* Pending Action Items
+ [well underway] review and re-close 3.4.x MAB fixed in 3.5.x (Rainer)
snip
MAB = most annoying bugs is a registered trademark by Tommy
Lol :-)
however I'm gonna let you use it under
* Present:
+ Tor, Rainer, Andras, Fridrich, Caolan, David, Michael,
Bjoern, Kendy, Michael S, Petr, Elidh, Lubos, Thorsten,
Stephan, Norbert
* Completed Action Items
+ Hamburg Hackfest
+ blog some artwork for 'going to the LibreOffice hack-fest'
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:16 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Ah, very good that you ask. I use the switch regularly, but am not so
used to the LookFeel on Win 7 in my virtualbox. Thus indeed: I had
picked the wrong one. and taking the other makes the (changed) OOo file
picker work.
Is
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 03:11 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
I just pushed a fix for fdo#33634 to master. This patch changes the
visual representation of borders significantly and I ask therefore for
testing and a ux look. We now display the borders based on the actual
width information and
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 09:09 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
+ bytemark machine #2
+ working on *BSD in virtualbox with little
joy help appreciated (Norbert)
+ need 3x BSD virtual-boxes (ideally)
I'd like to know a bit more about this
Hi Fridrich,
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 16:43 -0700, Pedro wrote:
So - Fridrich is going to do a re-spin. The (only) change (in a
nutshell) is to delete the cairocanvas.uno.dll from the program/
directory - so you can even test it before it goes live.
...
I think this was not cherry-picked
Hi there,
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 19:04 +0530, dE . wrote:
The MAB has been chaotic lately... actually it turned out that I didn't
get a lot of mails and missed out a lot of comments following the LONG
discussion in the bug... so sorry about that, I noticed them now.
:-)
What I've
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:24 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
It's a bug reporter like this that makes me lose hope in a FOSS
project such as this one.
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:55 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
In this case, I prefer using whiteboard instead of metabug:
Easy for me to query too.
+ inter-operability into Whiteboard for all these bugs
Gosh that's a long string; how about 'interop' :-)
+ and maybe plus
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
There is strong conflicting opinion between Bjoern and Rainer. I suggest
to decide this on the ESC or QA meeting.
It's on the agenda.
BTW: There was wrongly described Novell bugzilla. In fact, it has the
best solution, I have
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:37 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
i'd prefer something more specific like office-interop msft-interop
mso-interop or whatever because there are other things we need to
interop with as well even if they may be less important :)
Sounds reasonable;
* Present:
+ Andras, Mirek, Michael, Kendy, Stephan, Eike, Fridrich,
David, Michael S, Petr, Rainer, Mitch, Caolan, Markus,
Cedric, Tor, Kohei
* Completed Action Items
+ ask Astron to show up and/or Mirek for UI team (Michael)
+ concrete bugzilla
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:55 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
I'm curious - what does the AA tag mean?
Either Alcoholics Anonymous, or Action Item :-) depending how difficult
the task is that people volunteer for the meaning varies ;-)
It's a simple way of trying to track the few
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:12 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:55 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
I'm curious - what does the AA tag mean?
Either Alcoholics Anonymous, or Action Item :-) depending how difficult
the task is that people volunteer for the meaning varies
* Present:
+ Norbert, Stephan, Caolan, Eike, Thorsten, Markus,
Kohei, Cedric, Andras, Bjoern, Tor, Kendy, Ellie,
Rainer, Michael S, Michael M, Petr, Lubos, Mitch
* Completed Action Items
+ poke RedHat security guy wrt. keys (Caolan)
+ investigate
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 11:07 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
I did some first thoughts concerning a Wizard gaining some basic info
from LibO (OS, Version / ID-No, some basic user settings (what still
need some discussion) with Rob Snelders at the Hackfest in Hamburg.
Gaining the info from
Hi guys,
Yesterday I re-factored the projector display detection for the
slideshow in impress quite substantially, and also fixed some threading
evilness in the code. For me (for no apparent reason) the presenter view
shows up in black white with no pretty images [ I imagine it will for
* Present:
+ Norbert, Rainer, David, Stephan (Astron), Stephan B,
Fridrich, Tor, Kohei, Cedric, Petr, Michael, Andras,
Thorsten, Caolan, Eike, Kendy, Alexander, Markus,
Bjoern
+ ran out of phone-lines - urk.
* Completed Action Items
+
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 11:25 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Interesting that this area still takes some of your attention ;-)
Anything to get rid of the embarrassingly malingering ESC action item I
was given in this area ;-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com ,
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 08:09 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
I observe a remarkable number of bug reports concerning spell check
problems after update during the last days. Unfortunately quality of
those reports is lousy, so that it is difficult to find out what the
reason might be, but I am
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 08:54 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Ah, that's very different. So essentially people that now have
immediate gratification^W commit rights would go back to one day
delay?
Nah - as Bjoern says this is only for non-trivial patches that the
reviewer is not
I guess this should have been CC'd here ...
Forwarded Message
From: Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
To: Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de
Cc: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Cleaning bug list
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 23:49:52 -0700
Sure thing, I'll
Hi Joel,
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:49 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Sure thing, I'll include it here and add a link as soon as I post over
at freedesktop bugs
This is prolly best on the libreoffice-qa list (I just CC'd it) - but
it's interesting on the hackers list too. Your cleanup sounds
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 00:36 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
Does Bad luck mean Tough luck for Windows 2000 users because we are not
even going to try to fix that?
Also please consider yourself part of we.
Ah - I think it's a
* Present:
+ Norbert, Rainer, Eike, Lionel, Michael, Stephan, Andras,
Cedric, Bjoern, Kendy, Astron, Petr, Mitch
* Completed Action Items
+ add encryption default UI option in 3.6 (Thorsten)
+ poke at Windows 8 certification requirements (Andras)
Hi Cor,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 23:23 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote (21-06-12 17:55)
* 3.5 bugs tagged with 'regression'
+ 179(+12) bugs open of 631(+17) total
[...]
Just taking a quick look at issues from the query below, I would suggest
to skip mentioning numbers
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 11:12 +0200, Philipp Riemer wrote:
status NEW https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43460. As
far as I understand the comments, it is completed and can either be
closed or needs new input:
Nice catch; found closed :-)
Thanks,
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:38 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
What do others think?
If it gets us more testing of 3.6 - it sounds like an excellent idea to
me :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 19:12 +0200, VLB1 wrote:
The bug 46250 is begin in 3.5.0 and still in 3.6.0 beta 2!
With a code pointer it might be an easy-hack I suppose. The calc team
had a really good drive to reduce their regression count - but we lost
Kohei for vacation for the last several
* Present:
+ Eike, Astron, Markus, Rainer, Michael, Kendy, Bjoern,
Michael Stahl, Caolan, David, Cedric, Andras, Petr,
Lionel
* Completed Action Items
+ icons: poke Mango authors (Michael)
+ revert 3.6 to opaque background on Win7 (Kendy)
* Pending
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:51 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-06-29 14:47, Caolán McNamara wrote:
I looked through some of these, some patches are just experimental
stuff or debugging patches or obsolete stuff.
Maybe we should have some way of marking bugs in in-progress or
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 17:35 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
One of my mein concerns is that we aren't keeping up with bug reports
so we may close a bug at eol without anyone from QA or any developer
ever looking at it. To me this seems unfair to the reporter.
We could append a statement
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 18:35 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:56:32AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* CXX0X-ABI incompatibility can of worms (Bjoern)
+ gcc 4.7 - cxx0x extension is binary incompatible
+ incompatible stdlib symbols that bust
Hi Bodo,
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 14:17 +0200, Bodo Rittershofer wrote:
I am working with Windows 7/64. Every time I try to open dBase-data
LibreOffice (latest version) LO stops working and doesn’t react any
more. Working with the same dBase Data in Open Office is no problem.
Please fix that
* Present
+ Rainer, Markus, Mirek, Mitch, Michael, Michael S, Eike,
Ellie, Thorsten, Bjoern, Kohei, Cedric
* Completed action items
+ file GSoC / mentor session for Berlin (Cedric)
+ look into cppunit related build issues on Win32 / master (Michael)
+
Hi Joel,
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 23:03 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I tend to agree and disagree. I think that ultimately it could dampen
creativity but we have to consider some of the facts:
Heh - well, there is ongoing work to make us more interoperable. Last I
looked there were some
* Present:
+ Pierre-Eric, Stephan, Lionel, Eike, Bjoern, Michael,
Cedric, Astron, Thorsten, Rainer, Caolan, David, Petr
* Completed Action Items
+ fix gerrit moderation issues (Bjoern)
+ help Mirek update Mac installer artwork (Thorsten)
+ always
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 19:33 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
may be, but as Alex said, I also see such slips from time to time and
some latent aggressiveness (and also rather good work).
Right - it is worth bearing in mind that if someone has had their
document data lost / corrupted by
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:19 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:09:27AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Do we have an ongoing list of open issues that we keep track of and up to
date?
Yes, its called bugzilla. ;)
Heh - I guess it is a fair point that some
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 10:55 +0200, khagaroth wrote:
I just installed RC4 and the bug of not starting on first run (only
the splash shows up and then nothing) is back (it was there for 3.5
and then fixed if I remember correctly).
Yep - this is back for 3.6.0 but fixed for 3.6.1 - OTOH,
* Present:
+ Norbert, Stephan, Rainer, Michael, Bjoern, Kohei, Caolan,
Christian, Kendy, Petr, Cedric, Michael S, Astron
* Completed Action Items
+ quest for kind volunteer to update the website (Michael)
+ thanks to Marc !
+ another review for
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 10:49 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
There simply is a lot of ignorance and misunderstanding on
disc...@de.libreoffice.org, it seems they believe all developers are
sitting around bored and need some pushing of German users so that they
start working.
* Present
+ Kohei, Rainer, Cedric, Lionel, Eike, Astron, Andras,
Stephan, Caolan, Michael, Thorsten, Norbert, Kendy,
Michael S, Petr
* Completed Action Items
+ task selection for LibreOffice 4 wiki:
+
Hi Timur,
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 12:16 +0200, Timur Gadzo wrote:
I'm asking for EXPLANATION in the first post when will FIXES for bugs
resolved in MAB 3.5 be included in LO 3.6 CODE.
Ah ! sorry, I mis-understood :-) so the generic answer to:
when will XYZ bug be fixed ?
Hi there,
So - in the attempt to get something concretely actionable out of this;
I liked this idea:
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 12:30 -0700, bfo wrote:
Call for bugs (CFB). I think that CFB should be introduced in the release
schedule (example
Hi there,
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:38 -0700, bfo wrote:
Unfortunately those graphs are discouraging in many ways. Especially if one
thinks about upgrading LO...
Sure - of course I want to get on people's case ;-) we don't show any
visibility of the overall number of non-regression bugs
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:33 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
I can assure you they are. The best way to get a bug solved is:
...
Once you are there, it is orders of magnitude easier to go ahead with the bug.
Sure - the problem is then for developers to sift out these bugs where
a ton of
Hi there,
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 04:57 -0700, bfo wrote:
One thing I'd like to do is make a developers' portal - we can use as a
homepage, with easy-to-use boxes to lookup bug numbers, and interesting
reports on the page: that might be rather a good way of advertising the
latest
JFYI,
Yes we ship with bugs, and yes we get flamed for it - perhaps that
makes me lap up the appreciation for Kohei's good work fixing things :-)
ATB,
Michael.
Forwarded Message
From: bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
To: michael.me...@novell.com
* Present:
+ Norbert, Lionel, David, Andras, Kendy, Michael M, Stephan,
Mitch, Michael S, Petr, Tor, Cedric, Caolan, Astron, Kohei
* Completed Action Items
+ notify QA list of need for calc / late-feature testing (Eike)
+ invite successful GSOC students to come
Hi John,
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 19:10 +0200, John Smith wrote:
Maybe im just dumb, but: Once you have provided a reliable and
reproducible test case (in this case, download the odt file attached
to the report and save it as docx in libreoffice), is there still a
need to provide further info at
Hi Joel,
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 22:31 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Is there a way to report users on FDO. This is in regards to the
comment made here by user Urmas
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025
Not that I know of; sounds like we need one though :-)
I tend to not
Hi Roman,
On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 18:00 +0200, Roman Eisele wrote:
As said above, my survey is not completed yet, and I will give you a
more detailed analysis when I am done -- especially about the bugs which
still need action by bugwranglers and/or developers !
Thanks for doing all
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 18:19 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* Present:
+ propose new Difficulty: DifficultyHard
Eek, multiple questions on that:
- What would be the difference to DifficultyInteresting in hard
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 10:38 +0200, Tommy wrote:
I hope I did not create too much problems with that...
Personally, I think donating is a great way to contribute.
On the other hand, lets stop spamming the developers list ;-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Hi there,
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 06:35 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
Sigh - people are busy; in particular Markus - whose baby this is has
just put in a great chunk of bug-fixing work for 3.6.2 / 3.6.3 to
improve lots of conditional formatting
Hi Andras,
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 15:45 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
I am going to fix it over the weekend. But in case the fix does not get
into 3.6 branch in time, a simple workaround is to add --disable-gtk to
the configuration for Windows and MacOS X builds.
Isn't that just a matter
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 18:36 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
Isn't that just a matter of adding it to the distro-config files ?
having custom configure settings on release build machines is a
disaster-area :-)
I agree, please cherry pick
Hi there,
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 23:52 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Le 28/09/2012 10:58, Michael Meeks a écrit :
The other day I pushed a media speedup for all platforms, and a
gstreamer media / thumbnailing win for Linux to master.
What do you mean by media speedup ? When loading
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 23:58 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
For the final repo, depending on the final sizes, it would be lovely
to have some exponential backoff for older versions. If 3.4 and 3.3
builds are too much of a hassle, could we then please simply add all
our canned binaries from
Hi Joel,
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 11:41 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I've created a hard hacks wiki where we can keep track of proposed
hard hacks and then have an easy to go to list to discuss during our
conference calls. Here is the link:
Sounds good to me :-)
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 21:19 +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
To cut it short, we came to the conclusion, that a Bug
Submission API (BS-API) would be very helpful.
Could you elaborate a little the why??
Heh - it sounds like a nice way to report bugs to me. Of course, it
also sounds like it
Hi Joel,
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 10:23 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I'm cleaning up and adding fixed hard hacks to the wiki
Great - I re-ordered the page to put the big bug query at the bottom;
added some more moderate comment on the 3.5 MAB list - and added the
list of fixed hardhacks with
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 10:43 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I just randomly did a pull on FDO of all bugs reported under LibO and
saw that we've hit the 10,000 (exactly) number. I know it's strange to
celebrate bug reports but that's a pretty cool milestone as it means our
users are reporting
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 18:49 +0200, Anton Meixome wrote:
Few days ago I have sent a important bug for integration. I know that
here, in lists is not the way for manage it, but...
Drat - I suspect the 3.6.3 process overlapping with the conference
and/or the openSUSE conference + labs
* Present:
+ Eike, David, Kendy, Astron, Markus, Stephan, Caolan,
Bjoern, Michael M, Kohei, Thorsten, Joel
* Completed Action Items
+ fdo#55290 - master doesn't install on windows (dtardon)
+ build a list of Certified / developer names for Italo (Michael)
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 08:29 -0700, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Problems with the daily TinderBox builds took the better part of two weeks
to get the initial commit for this issue tested. I had to ask to have it
pushed down on the -3-6 build for testing because there has not been a
viable
Hi Rizwan,
It'd be great to have you involved with LibreOffice :-)
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 01:23 +0530, Rizwan Alam wrote:
I want to contribute to libreoffice how ever i do not have experience.
I am a bit confused. I was thinking about doing testing can any one
help me out.
So
Hi Marc,
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 05:25 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, all the bugs mentioned in the Most Annoying Bugs
section (bottom of page) of our 3.6 Features webpage have been resolved?
Can I go ahead and update that section with strike-throughs and mark
them as
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 03:20 -0700, Pedro wrote:
ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote
my 3.6.2.1 is up to date. Shouldn't be so.
My 3.5.7.1 install reports LibreOffice 3.5 is up to date.
Shouldn't be so.
Sorry - I've not published the ESC minutes yet; Kendy is pulling the
lever
* Present:
+ Kendy, Stephan, Eike, Markus, Michael M, Petr, Lubos,
Norbert, Thorsten, Caolan, Ahmad.
+ bad week for US overlap; regrets from Joel etc.
* Completed Action Items
+ issues to look into if we can
+ fdo#34548 - review Michael's patch
1 - 100 of 390 matches
Mail list logo
