Christoph Noack schrieb:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/, Firefox shows the message
'This connection isn't trusted'.
Hi,
I can't confirm that. I very often see such messages, but not for the
assistant with WIN7 FF 6.0.2
CU
Rauber
___
Christoph Noack schrieb:
@ Rainer: The current bug submission assistant is great basis to
continue! Nevertheless, it contains some usability issues already
addressed in the proposed interaction design [1] (e.g. confirmation for
submit, checking for similar bugs). So how to prepare that for
Hi,
to be honest: I completely lost the overview what's going on to fulfill
what needs.
CU
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
Julien Nabet schrieb:
ok with the new version, could I simply close it (with of course a
comment which explains why) ?
Hi,
I did it, that's the way how it should be done.
you read http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport,
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details?
If you
Loic Dachary schrieb:
I noticed a few duplicate entries and figured they were caused by double clicks
on the submit button.
Hi,
sounds good, I will additionally test the fix with a new report and mark
[Bug 41300] New: BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Missing Message that Attachment has
been uploaded
Hi,
are you still active observing long time unconfirmed bugs? We do not
have many rules for that, but it's recommended to start such actions
lsowly, may be someone brings up new aspects after a short while.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to
Thank you for your help
Rainer
Hi,
you can find a summery concerning QA related discussion of the
Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Kind regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi,
you can find a summery (from my point of view) concerning QA related
discussion of the Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Kind regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Hello,
I am just trying to create a reliable bug needs review for Confirmation.
1. step was
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb:
Hello,
now I know (writing such a mail always helps), UNCONFIRMED bugs are all
missing. But why?
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http
Pedro Lino schrieb:
If all of them start pumping daily releases which one(s) should we test?
Hi,
we will have to find out. I see you are interested in QA-affairs, so you
should subscribe libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org, where these
questions should be discussed.
Currently I install
Michael Meeks schrieb:
I believe we switched our packaging format from NSIS .exe's to the
new .msi installs that you see now.
Hi,
the problem simply might be missing manual. We have a how to on
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel#Windows for
doing a server
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb:
GUID) aren't possible with MSI. If what Rainer wants is to have stable
version of LibreOffice installed along with a testing version,
Or more precisely:
I have 10 ... 20 Master versions on my PC so that I can check where a
regression came into the code
Fridrich Strba schrieb:
Instead of setup.exe /a one should call msiexec.exe /a
Hello,
yes, that will work (and I remember that we already had this proceeding
for a while).
I added some hints on
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel#Windows
Kind regards
Rainer
Hello,
since beginning of the week we have many new builds from different
tinderboxes.
We had a significant increased number of bugs during these days, and
there is a suspect that some of them might be related to the tinderbox
from where the build is. First investigations seem to falsify
Hello,
it's a disaster, completely unusable! Quality of Beta0 is far behind
quality of Master during the last weeks, it seems that we were not lucky
with the time where the tag has been created ad got a very broken source.
Shit happens, now the question is how we will go on. I am afraid we
Pedro Lino schrieb:
So what do we (QA) do now? Is there some protocol? Are there tasks to
split? By how many?
Hi,
we should see how many and severe bugs really are Beta only, that
means to correct Version if the bug is from a more early version. If we
are lucky only few bugs will remain
Hi,
currently I have much trouble using existing user profiles with Master
or 3.5.0 Beta. The trouble vanishes when I switch to a blank new user
profile for.
I believe that might cause heavy trouble when users update from 3.4 8or
3.3), but on the other hand my suspect might be complete
Hello,
may I ask you to comment in
Bug 43515 - [Task]: RESET / BACK button text and function interchanged
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43515
and
Bug 43516 - LOCALHELP: Help text for BACK button describes RESET
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43516
always when you
Cor Nouws schrieb:
AFAIAC, no need to say sorry for that. It's part of our work that we
carry that happily, isn't it, Rainer ;-)
Hi,
Yes! I did not want to blame anyone, I only regretted our mishap to
catch one of the worse ones of the Source stages of development. And for
me Cor's idea
Pedro Lino schrieb:
The function Back doesn't make any sense. If the idea is to Undo the
values that you changed and you haven't Saved then you already have
the Cancel button.
Hi Pedro,
No, I disagree. Some dialogs have varioust TABs, and if you only want to
undo edits in one of them, it's
Pedro Lino schrieb:
But then the button should be simply named
Undo not Back. Back is used to move to the previous dialog (as
you can see in any installer under any OS).
Hi,
yes, If that does not hurt other rules (Consitency Operating System or
what ever) I would prefer Undo
Rainer
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.5.0/Beta0
Hello,
I added a comment concerning install / uninstall problems on SIN 64 bit
systems.
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
August Sodora schrieb:
I have removed the testtool and am listing the relevant commits here
Hi,
we have a wiki webpage concerning testtool:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Using_Testtool
Some info should be added
CU
Rainer
___
Pedro Lino schrieb:
Looking at the Release Plan chart
Pedro Lino schrieb:
Hi,
I am just preparing some information concerning such regression problems
we will discuss during next TSC call on Thursday before I publish it.
The current results are completely in accordance with Pedro's
Hi,
some bad luck, that version 3.5 Beta0 was terrible buggy. I believe
it's not useful to do tests with tat version, please wait for Beta1
(just uploading to mirrors) ad do your tests with that version (or with
Master from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/, of course).
Tests with Beta0
Hi,
unfortunately pdf gaining results of my research is based on a wrong
query, we have only 24 known unfixed regressions in Master, not 80. I
will correct that tomorrow.
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Lior Kaplan schrieb:
As 3.5.0 enters the first beta (ok, ok - beta0), I'd like to remind you
on the RTL stuff from the conference last month.
Hi,
please review, correct and complete my modifications on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details and
Andreas Mantke schrieb:
[...] in 3.4.4 everything works smoothly, but in 3.5.0-beta1 there is no text
animation available. If there are more than one animation on the slide, I got
on a
click the slide with the text again and again. Thus the the actions (mouse
clicks)
seemed to be recognized
Hi all,
compared to other active LibreOffice teams, User-QA currently has a very
rare Web page [1] with few, outdated and not inviting contents. So we
should improve the current page.
I started a new QA-Team Page [2], what should
- be up to date
- give an overview concerning active User QA
Hi,
you can find a summery from my point of view concerning QA related
discussion of the Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Pedro schrieb:
Hello Pedro,
Took the liberty of fixing the date and some typos ;)
THX!
What do you mean OOo has a 3.4 Beta? Are you referring to the old Beta
released in April 2011?
Yes, of course, I can't imagine why it seemed new to me. Have to wipe my
glasses again.
... worry
Hi Petr,
can you help me to find the WIN - LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs? ;-)
Or was the modification a Bugzilla arbitrary act?
BTW, I definitively added Bug 45219 to the list, and I remember that I
read already of at least 1 other user who was sure th have added the bug
and did not find
Florian Reisinger schrieb:
Hi,
Language for this list is English!
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa first
line below heading
Please announce such bugs nowhere! On no mailing list! Everybody who is
interested in Bug confirming knows how to find them in Bugzilla,
Hi,
you can find a summery from my point of view concerning QA related
discussion of the Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Pedro schrieb:
More intensive testing is not the problem. Your TSC summary shows there are
still 80 regressions. At a rate of 1 fix per day that would take over 2.5
months.
Hi,
I am afraid that is too optimistic; Oct-Dec 2011 115 regressions have
been fixed, but during the same time 64 new
Michael Meeks schrieb:
getting the regressions query in front of
more people would be good: [ a nice, short, easy to paste, minute and
re-find stored query for that would be great ;-) ].
Hi,
Petr added Regression query links to
Hi,
you can find a summery from my point of view concerning QA related
discussion of the Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
Hmm - any other way here, without having to pollute a foreign
bugtracker with LibO-specifics? A static list in the wiki maybe?
Hi,
I deal with your concerns, a consequent addition of bug numbers, so that
I can adapt the query link (or the reviewer can add new AOOo
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
In the wiki you could use the easy-hacks method, i.e. use a query and
add it to the page using the feed tag..
Hi,
great tool, unfortunatly I do not have experince at all. how will it
recognize ÁOoo Issues that have been reviewed by LibO QA?
I would have to add
Hello,
I have been used to see Bugzilla respecting my screen width, for nearby
all bugs Bugzilla line length for the comments matched with my screen
width. Some days ago behavior changed, Page heading and footer still
match perfectly with screen width, but now the text lines of comments
are
Hello,
I added some comments what should be mentioned before reopening a bug
report on
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#How_to_reopen_Bugs
(and
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA-FAQ#How_to_reopen_a_bug)
Please feel free to complete my hints.
Best regards
Rainer
Pedro schrieb:
Sorry for the noise.
Hi,
no problem, nothing teaches as much as mistakes we do ;-)
I will add some refinements from discussion here to the Wiki if nobody
else will have done until then.
ATB
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Hi,
today I got a hint by Mike Schinagl that the new Migrationsleitfaden
des Bundes 4.0 has been released.
Some comments in German you find here
http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Migrationsleitfaden-des-Bundes-in-neuer-Version-erschienen-1463867.html,
you can download the document from
Hi,
I have serious problems with Recovery, what does not work. If that's a
general problem that would be really critical. Can you please try to
reproduce?
Today I observed that my User Profile no longer contains a Backup folder
- intended or part of the bug?
I accidently sent this mail
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
We need to be sure to detect and pinpoint regressions earlier and more precise
than in 3.4
Hi,
That's at least an important part of the truth, when 3.4.0 release came
only 15 regressions were known (bud keyword handling was very arbitrary
in those days).
Let's
Dag Wieers schrieb:
So it's hard to quantify what 0 reports means, no regressions or no
user-testing ?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedversion=LibO%203.4.6%20RC1product=LibreOffice
CU
Rainer
___
List Name:
Hi,
I do not want to invest too much time into this discussion, because that
only hinders me and you all to contribute to the project and to solve
the problems. But I strongly disagree with all belittlement of
regressions. Although IMHO creation of 3.5.0 has been a good job, it
would not be
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
Bubli fixed that meanwhile on master - any chance you could test
whether
Hi,
yes, I will do a test soon.
Thx for hint
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb:
yes, I will do a test soon.
Hi,
I still suffer from Bug 44489 - MinGW: Will not launch, so I will have
to wait for the next Master from other source.
CU
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
Hi,
you wrote some similar ideas I had, but I was doubtful concerning
viability. May be we can discuss some suggestions during the next QA
call, I will be prepared.
If we would have a branch WIN build every week, I would find lots of
Bugs (if we have bugs), and
Hi,
now I did the test, Works fine for me with parallel Server installation
of LOdev 3.5.2rc0+ [Build ID: ec752de-73cb0b8-f269e46] Win-x86@6-fast
pull time 2012-03-19 11:08:23 – WIN7 Home Premium (64bit)
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name:
Hi,
you can find a summery concerning QA related discussion of the
Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Kind regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Florian Reisinger schrieb:
I found something rather worse. There are a lot of bugs with version 3.x
Hi,
of course we will have to review all those
Hi,
I have a question / suggestion concerning EasyHack tags. I do not know
whether there has been an agreement, and the Wiki is some wishy-washy
I would prefer a standard that ProposedEasyHack is for the
Wihiteboard, and a developer deletes that and adds EasyHack to the
summary line. That
a key word, but that should be
discussed with Lior Kaplan l...@gmail.com [5] and others active in
this area.
Please also mention discussion on this mailing list [6] concerning a
Most Annoying RTL Bugs [7].
I hope this information is useful for you
Best regards
Rainer Bielefeld
Hyperlinks
Hi all,
LibO 3.4 lifecycle is terminated, but currently there still are some 3.4
Most annoying bugs open. That's useless, there will be no more 3.4.
releases, so we will have to decide whether they are really MAB (then
they should be listed under 3.5. MAB) and what circumstances might
hinder
Hi,
it seems that it takes very long time (days?) until a contact fequest
for 'talkyoo_skype' will be confirmed.
I sent a message concerning this problem to Talkyoo support.
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Hi,
Although we currently we do not have any bugs reported for this, I
created a (currently temporary) new Sub component ASKLIBREOFFICE for
WWW, what will appear in the BUGZILLAASISSTANT with the next update. I
thought a while to take ASK (what also currently is unused with
component WWW),
Cor Nouws schrieb:
Hi Rainer,
- it easily gives the perception of a product that is not good enough;
Hi Cor, Hi Florian,
I believe the appropriate place for such queries considerations whether
upgrade might be ASK.LibreOffice.
Best regards
Rainer
Petr Mladek schrieb:
Why the query checks for bugs against Master and Daily? Are all of
these bugs in 3.5 as well?
Hi Petr,
I checked for Late Masters until more or less 3.5.0 release by query,
and the query only shows unfixed bugs, so that they definitively are in
3.5 (except they became
Petr Mladek schrieb:
My concern is how to differ regressions between LO-3.5 and LO-3.4 and
regressions between current master and LO-3.5.
Hi Petr,
that is regarded in those queries, (was simple for a .0), query for same
research for 3.5.1 introduced regressions will become some more
Hi,
can someone with Javascript skills please check
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48533?
Until now I was not able to reproduce the problem and my suspect still
is that it's a problem with reporter's browser (or similar), but I am
not sure.
Best regards
Rainer
Petr Mladek schrieb:
It is by purpose. We should probably update the subject to make it more
clear. What about the following?
[ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.3 RC1 builds available for pre-testing
Hi,
I believe that's a good Idea, subject for these first announcements
should be amended as
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
Hello Kohei,
I believe OfficeUser had a bad day when he wrote that lousy bad and
incomplete report with wild speculations instead of reviewable facts.
We should not attach
in the Wiki.
We should not test masses of Presentations before preparations will have
been finished.
Best regards
Rainer Bielefeld
Hyperlinks:
[1]
http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Migrationsleitfaden-des-Bundes-in-neuer-Version-erschienen-1463867.html
[2]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA
Hi,
I did a little check [1] and found a lot of fixed Bugs listed as 3.5
MAB where fix for 3.5 is not indicated by a target note in the Whiteboard.
We should watch that and add target info where possible.
Best regards
Rainer
Hyperlinks:
[1]
Tommy schrieb:
this looks quite worrisome:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38432
Hi Tommy,
yes, I thought about sorting out invalid ones ;-)
I created a shared query [2] where INVALID Bugs are excluded and also
Bugs that already have been posted for review on
Markus Mohrhard schrieb:
Can you explain what you think is missing there?
Mi Karkus,
my mistake: I only saw the Bugzilla mail Stephan Bergmann committed
... what does not include the target:3.6.0 addition, but that's correct
because target:3.6.0 was already in the whiteboard.
A quick
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
- create a QA EasyHack Gather own bugzilla requirements (Bjoern)
- create a wikipage with what we have so far and link to it (Rainer)
Hi,
I will start that during next week
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name:
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
+ connect Rainer with sysadmins wrt. status/live issues ticker
(Thorsten)
Hi,
I do not need any further information concerning new bugs. I use a query
sorting out bugs where already other trusted staff is involved (to
avoid double work), and I can't
Korrawit Pruegsanusak schrieb:
I saw Rainer now use method [2] ... and if we confirm using method
Hello Korrawit,
thank you for the hint, today I found the time to correct that.
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Korrawit Pruegsanusak schrieb:
Another topic(?) -- bugzilla version picker for master / daily branch:
* do we need to separate builds from master and release branch
Hi,
I am still a little wishy-washy, but we are not in a hurry - decision
will be required when we get the first 3.7.0Alpha
M
I think the idea was to have a ticker for live sysadmin issues,
Yes,
that's a part of an idea, I will follow up that soon when some other
actions with higher priority will have been finished.
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name:
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
AA+ add yourself on openhatch.org (all)
Hi,
I think it is a good idea to do some networking, offer help and
contribution, ask for volunteers. And may be openhatch.org can be a
platform for that.
But for all people who have a brain working similar to mine that
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
I think this is unavoidable as it seems OpenHatch assumes one bugtracker hosts
one project.
Hi,
so it seems we will have to live with it.
Best regard
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Yi Fan Jiang schrieb:
If you want to file a bug or an enhancement, please report it to
freedesktop bugzilla with Product Libreoffice, Component WWW. More
details of howto report a bug is described here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport#Reporting_a_bug_in_few_Steps
Hi,
I defined
Nino schrieb:
Who is in charge of the list? Could you ban this Groupon Urbano
spammer?
Hi,
done! Thank you for the hint.
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
Hi all,
as a consequence of our QA related discussions at Hackfest April 2012 in
Hamburg
http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/hackfest-hamburg-2012/
I now want to start to collect ideas how we can make a big step
improving our (Bugzilla) Bug tracking system. The goal is that after we
will
Michael Meeks schrieb:
It doesn't create a wizard however. The only thing blocking
improvements there - the first of which IMHO would be to submit /
auto-fill the component and version fields - is a lack of developer
resource willing to concretely work on it ;-)
Hi,
I did some first
Terrence Enger schrieb:
Might I suggest that body starting Seu cliente de e-mail is a
good hint that the message is spam?
Hi,
I do no know how to create such a filter rule.
The ban list seems to be rather useless, it seems that those addresses
are not added to a filter rule?
I am
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
If you're referring to the subscription banlist, then indeed it is not
working as that only tells mailman to never subscribe that address.
Hi Christian ,
I did so now after your hint.
For more filtering, use the Spam filters option - this is limited to
filter
Hi,
has already someone tested http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/bibisect/
successfully and can contribute a short manual on
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect?
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi,
may be you find the time to check and transfer (if necessary) some bugs
from AOOo to LibO as I did with [1] to [2]? Some promising Bugs I
found with this [3] query. [From Symphony] can help to find more Bugs
also interesting for LibO.
Discussion if required please on
Hi,
we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests”
that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we
will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1.
What do you think about an alpha2?
More details and a poll here:
Markus Mohrhard schrieb:
Can someone verify this regression before report the bug?.
Hi,
a quick test with an existing document shows a crash with 3.6.0alpha1,
but not with parallel installation of Master LOdev 3.6.0alpha0+ –
WIN7 Home Premium (64bit) ENGLISH UI [Build ID: 7175cee]
June 6, 2012
Hello,
We branched 3.6 and have a new Master, I have to hurry up a little with
my action to revise the Bugzilla version picker contents due to
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:BugReport_Details. Please
excuse me for being late with this.
First Steps
I just created a
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
3.X.Y_alphaZ - for alpha releases
3.X.Y_betaZ- for beta releases
3.X.Y.Z - for release candidates
Hi Bjoern,
I think we should only use 1 kind of separator, everything else produces
impredictable sort order results in different contexts.
Hi,
it would be great if an expert could add some brief notes on
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile concerning following
questions:
- Is it allowed/possible/useful to use the same User Profile with
more than 1 User?
- Is it allowed/useful/ to use the same User Profile with
Hi Petr,
thank you for the reminder, I also regret that I often only find Bug
12345 added, and I have to go to the bug and have to check what kind of
bug it is and why it might be MAB ...
please, add comments into the meta bugs when you add new most annoying
bugs. One line describing the
Petr Mladek schrieb:
[Second schema]
3.6.0.00x for alphas
3.6.0.0x0 for betas
3.6.0.100 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.200 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.200 for release(example)
Hi Petr,
this Idea should not exclude additional information, of course we should
include tha
Hi all,
unfortunately I still was too lazy to learn enough concerning
bibisecting, but it would be great if those who already have some
experience would do some bibisecting for Bugs where that seems useful:
- LibO 3.5 or later
- Reproduced for Linux
I created a new Whiteboard key word
Joel Madero schrieb:
I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart.
Hi Joel,
great to see that all in a chart, your conclusions and definitions seem
plausible.
But the chart also shows the limitations of that concept: It's really
sophisticated, and no developer will sit at
Hi all,
I am happy to see that we have a solution for the general problem, I
will change picker texts with 3.6.0.0.beta2
The remaining problem is what we will do with
3.7.0.0.alpha1+daily
3.7.0.0.alpha2+daily
3.7.0.0.beta1+ daily
3.7.0.0.beta2+ daily
3.7.1.0.alpha1+daily
?=
My suspect is that that is somehow related to Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed what I find in those
mail headings.
What ever that might mean.
Best regards
Rainer Bielefeld
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Roman Eisele schrieb:
our list of Friendly experts at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/FindTheExpert
does not include any expert for general UI/GUI bugs
Hi,
Ivan Timofeev (timofeev@gmail.com) fixed a lot of general UI
problems, I recommend that you ask him whether he agrees to be
Hi all,
today in the afternoon I will change the picker contents as discussed:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#New_Versions_2012-06-20
For a short while the Bug Submission Assistant will be out of order,
please excuse the inconvenience!
Best Regards
Rainer Bielefeld
Hi,
with the new Version picker items your Atom feeds containing Version
picker contents will not work any longer, because the picker contents
references now will be invalid. You will have to renew the feeds.
This also might affect feeds used in the Wiki.
Questions, remarks and discussion
Hi all,
we want to encourage users to report and to confirm LibreOffice bugs.
One important factor whether we will be successful with that attempt is
that users get a quick response to their reports. To reach this goal, it
would be great if 1 … 2 volunteers could watch Bugzilla for new 3.6.0
Cor Nouws schrieb:
Just taking a quick look at issues from the query below, I would suggest
to skip mentioning numbers. There is pollution with old issues,
Hi,
may be!
The query is very useful to track and look at the reports. But the
number gives a wrong idea of quality.
But consider
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
