On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl wrote:
I don't know what is wrong. But the BSA is updated but isn't shown on
the website.
When I go to the direct link of the BSA[1] then I get the 4.0.0.3
release as option, but when I go to the website[2] it isn't. Can
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
On Ask please request that they go to bugzilla directly, let them know that
it's only intimidating at first and really isn't that hard to work.
Will do.
___
List Name:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
I like the changes. Actually i prefer
someone to bug-triager
and
person to developer
While the more precise definitions are important to us and we might
'naturally' understand what the terms ,eam those
I've been fielding several questions about Unity integration in
LibreOffice. For example:
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/11626/unity-integration-in-libreoffice-40-doesnt-work/
The LO Release Notes/Features pages describe this support as landing
in LO 4.0.0:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Thanks for looking into this ! so this is essentially a build
environment problem. If you want Unity integration to work - you will
need to get a build from your distributor.
Ah, okay. We definitely should
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:40:50AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
- Is there currently a source for builds with Unity menu integration?
Yes, Ubuntu Raring has the build with the upstreamed Unity
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb:
was necessary with oLder Wikimedia for getting some templates working.
...
with OLDER Wikimedia, of course.
...
(not directly related to BSA, but shows some Wikimedia
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sophie Gautier
gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
So I'll try first to explain my idea clearly on the workflow we have
thought about:
thanks! :-)
- a user fills information on the BSA in French
- no issue is created
- the content of the submission is
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sophie Gautier
gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'll start to document the BSA process for NLP who would like to join
later, where would you like me to put this page on the wiki ?
My original suggestion was here:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Nino Novak nn.l...@kflog.org wrote:
Personally I'd prefer to have a hierarchically organized Page tree like
there was in the ooowiki, with a clear hierarchy like
QA
QA/Tools
QA/Tools/BSA
...
In such a schema, where would you put a page about the NLang BSA?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
C. H. D. for LibreOffice QA wrote
Recently, I downloaded the daily build for testing. However, I cannot find
the _sha1sum_ or _sha512sum_ values for checking the file.
To my knowledge this project does not include any MD5 or SHA
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com
wrote:
I do have some experience in setting that up. That is something I can help
out with if you would like me to.
We would love to try
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
If talkyoo is free why host it on TDF hardware?
And it is not hosted on TDF-hardware. But talkyoo generously does
provide the service to the TDF free of charge.
Ah, okay. I didn't know that Talkyoo
(dropping libreoffice-dev from cc)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
Christian kindly forwarded me the e-mail about talkyoo. Sorry to hear there
have been issues.
In general, using Skype is *not* recommended. It *will* cause
In our last QA Meeting we discussed what we should do with bugs filed
against Extensions or Templates. We didn't make much headway on the
discussion, as reflected in the minutes:
-AGREED: Move discussion to email, try to find consensus, if not vote to decide
--
[Note: From this point
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
The basic problem is that bugs are filed against Extensions and
Templates in the same manner as bugs filed against LibreOffice proper.
We had general agreement that the developer of the Extension should
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
We could use a G+ page for sure (maybe we can send in pictures of ourselves
to give it a bit of character). What we don't want is a system where a
google account is required to access our conference call via a computer
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Brenda Granados bgra...@gmail.com wrote:
Robinson Tryon wrote
Here are the different approaches:
B) We clearly and explicitly inform users about which
Extensions/Templates have official support and which ones have
unofficial support from the developers
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Robinson Tryon wrote (29-03-13 06:29)
Thoughts on these proposals?
Both involve quite some work/handling/training to make them work as desired.
And then still: bugs for extensions will appear in BugZilla, either being
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Robinson Tryon schrieb:
It looks like that bug was submitted via the BSA. Perhaps we need to
be more explicit in the BSA about authoring bugs in English?
Hi,
Please see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Remember that if an extension stops working, it's not the absentee
developer who is inconvenienced, but the user who installed it with
some expectations of reliability.
What one can do now, is like/dislike. But that's a quite
I've cc'd Andreas on this email as well..
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Robinson Tryon schrieb:
In our last QA Meeting we discussed what we should do with bugs filed
against Extensions or Templates.
did I miss something? Do we have
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Robinson Tryon schrieb:
Bugzilla is for bugs that we're willing to address/fix as a project,
Hi Robinson,
I am (more or less) the the creator of the LibO Bugzilla bug tracking
system
Really? cool -- I
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jochen oo...@jochenschiffers.de wrote:
Hi Rainer,
I added links to bugzilla from the German QA-Wiki (see [1]). Is it okay?
[1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Database
Updated URL:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
QA. Fortunately, Joel White started to be more active at this time and
took some of Rainer's responsibilities, including QA statistic, leading
the QA call, driving forward many QA activities. They both use a bit
different
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Le 05/04/13 05:31 PM, Joel Madero a écrit :
Hi All,
Qubit has done a tremendous amount of work in the past couple days
moving QA related wiki pages to their appropriate location (../QA/..) vs
under root of wiki or
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Le 07/04/13 07:24 PM, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
Il 07/04/2013 20:00, Robinson Tryon ha scritto:
I'm 'qubit' on most sites, but 'colonelqubit' on Freenode
I have met Robinson at LibrePlanet in Boston, and he is really a great
On the ReleasePlan page[1] we have detailed descriptions of the
release dates of our builds, but I don't see any mention of the End of
Life (EOL) dates for the builds and branches, except for a small note
on the 'Lifecycle' graphic.
Do we have EOL dates in mind for our builds and branches? Is
(Petr touched on some similar points; I haven't had a chance to finish
my reply until today :-)
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Quality Assurance has to do something with quality, and we have to observe
and grant the quality of your own
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jochen oo...@jochenschiffers.de wrote:
Hi *,
Am 09.04.2013 15:53, schrieb Pedro:
The image just needs to be corrected by user uroveits.
I´m uroveits. I've been watching this thread and I will change the graphic
when EOL has been set.
:-)
Great.
As Pedro
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Pedro wrote:
Does this also mean that 3.4 versions can already be removed from the
bugzilla Version picker? And 3.5 versions after the 18th of this month?
Hi Pedro,
no, we can't. Version info in BZ
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
I see that you both use a bit different logic, so we need to decide how
we count the 6 and 9 months. I understand it the following way:
+ the release is defined by the minor version release, e.g. 3.6
or 4.0
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
So we need to set an official, every two week (or maybe 3?) time for our
meetings...I say we set it in stone, we
either meet that day or we cancel the meeting (no more moving it around, I
think it gives a bad
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said to Joel, I don't consider myself part of the QA team. I'm just
someone who sometimes contributes to this project. Since many of my
contributions don't even deserve an answer (even a f* off would be nicer
than being
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Robinson Tryon píše v St 10. 04. 2013 v 11:29 -0400:
So would we provide an EOL date for each point release in a series, or
just a single EOL date for all of our 3.6.x released builds?
I think that only the single EOL date
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Humans are not bits of data that you
could move fast over the internet.
Hmm... consider the following:
StarOffice
StarTrek
Coincidence? I think not..
--R
___
List Name:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Taking the 3.6 branch as an example, the first release came out by Aug
12th., after which point there were no new major/minor builds until
4.0 was released just after 3.6.5 in February. That means that for 6
months, the 3.6
[cc'd QA list as this is relevant to their interests]
One of the perennial questions about the Ask site is How do we
interoperate with QA (and the QA Team) and Bugzilla?
We often get questions on the Ask site such as this:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 12. 04. 2013 v 13:24 -0400:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Regarding the EOL date, I've mocked-up an example of how we could
display it on the wiki page:
https
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Kieran Peckett crazyske...@gmail.com
wrote:
On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only?
+1
Unfortunately, no. What we can do is when we hit a bug that says bug present
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
I am afraid that this could not work easily. If we do the work and
select 10-15 nice features and find potential volunteers, we probably do
not need voting. There will be most likely different volunteers for the
different
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Sophie Gautier
gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
Concerning this item
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19#PENDING_ITEM:_Documentation_for_Localized_French_BSA
please consider that we (FR group) are acting as a community and not as
As brought-up by Bjoern during the meeting, it's good for us if we can
identify how many regressions have been introduced during the course
of a (minor) release series of LibreOffice.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/May_3#PENDING_ITEM:_Regressions_within_a_release
One good
Per discussion at the meeting today, we generally agreed to the following:
AGREED: For users inquiring about tech support after the EOL date of a
release, we politely indicate that the release is EOL and ask them to
upgrade to a new version (or go talk to their vendor/distro/paid tech
support)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 19. 04. 2013 v 17:21 -0400:
6 months sounds fine to me for most of the bugfix releases.
Well, I would suggest to leave either the last bugfix release or some
generic version, e.g. 3.5, 3.4, 3.3
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
not good! We will not create complicated wrong rules for things what are
easy to understand.
My rule was 1 short sentence long. Compared to the current morass of
QA documentation, I don't think it's
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Joel - How much work would it be to bibisect the regressions for each
release? Aside from initial triage/repro, what other QA tasks should
take priority over this work?
For major releases not a problem but for minor
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Le 19/04/2013 23:21, Robinson Tryon a écrit :
AGREED: We de-list versions in Bugzilla 6 months after the release has
been EOLed
I
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:56:21AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
This kind of scenario is one of the reasons I was interested in
implementing my Repro Table. The current version drop-down is both
too long
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
So, as a developer, I would think comments (and the platform field) would be
sufficient for these rare cornercases.
For fixed and reappearing, I think its
not really an issue:
- if the bug is really
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Just trying to see if anyone thinks a special meeting is needed to finish
the agenda from last Friday or if we should just punt until next Friday.
Given that we didn't get through the entire agenda last Friday,
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Just a warning that some edits to our wiki seems to have broken our ability
to update BSA. Rob and Robinson are actively trying to solve the problem but
it could be an issue with upcoming release.
I will keep
(moving to just QA, as now we're getting into the nitty-gritty)
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Why is it moved?
We (well, mostly me) were trying to clean up the documentation of
Bugzilla, the
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:59 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:
An aside from the discussions, I do like the new QA meeting minutes format,
very easy to see what was covered from the agenda and what actions and best
practices are put forth in discussion.
A reader is now able to
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Just a warning that some edits to our wiki seems to have broken our ability
to update BSA. Rob and Robinson are actively trying to solve the problem but
it could be an issue with upcoming release.
Update: The
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Petr, all
Petr Mladek wrote
The release builds does not have the + because they are well defined
by the related tag.
Ok. Sounds like a reasonable option.
Maybe this should be documented somewhere, at least for QA people?
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Another whiteboard status post. Should we just move forward with removing
bibisect3* whiteboard status'? Now that bibisect40 has everything, there's
really no need for these.
+1
My proposal:
bibisectrequest
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Nino Novak nn.l...@kflog.org wrote:
Am 13.05.2013 00:03, schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
That's why we run it on fdo - such that you don't have to worry. ;)
But in this case, IMHO we /have/ to worry a bit as there has been
increasing spam impact in the last week or
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
So I want to clarify the plan for Friday in terms of how we are going to
communicate. My pitch unless there are objections (from someone planning on
attending ;) ) -
1. Try 5 minutes prior to 1300 to use
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO
...
P.S. Robinson - is location of this appropriate? You're my go to wiki
organization guru :)
So the base for Bugzilla stuff is typically QA/Bugzilla. The field
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Will do. If you're okay with waiting for a major rework again, I'd like to
focus just on NEEDNIFO first, then tackle the other stuff listed in the
email :)
Sure, sure. I'll move the page now. I'll ping you when I'm done
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Cao Cuong Ngo cao.cuong@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been selected in GSoC this year, project Extend Support for
Content Management Systems.
I will implement the connection to Google Drive and properties/version
dialog extension of CMIS.
cool!
It
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
P.S.: Robinson, it would be awesome if we could drop such a note on the
minutes
to the projects@-list in the future so it is kept visible to other parts of
the
project. could you take care of that?
Hi all,
Minutes from our Friday QA meeting are available here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/June_14
Our next QA Meeting will be on June 28th. Agenda may be found here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/June_28
Cheers,
-- Robinson
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
So, if we use bugzilla as intended, a bug that is fixed, but not in a released
version yet should be RESOLVED/FIXED. Once that the release containing the
fix is out it should go to CLOSED/FIXED. Note the
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't found a really clean way to grab just the active list of
LibreOffice version numbers, but I refactored some of the
version-grabbing code in query.pl and made it possible to get version
numbers from
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Jean Spiteri
beimaginativeegr...@gmail.com wrote:
From what I have understood, the versions are got via a file named:
version.xhtml. Is this correct or not?
The processed version #s are formatted and then saved in
version.xhtml. They are slurped from the
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Rob Snelders libreoff...@ertai.nl wrote:
Hi Joel,
Joel Madero schreef op 21-06-2013 21:09:
Hi to both of you.
I've added a requested component to FDO (UX-Advice) for bugs that need
UX input. From what Robinson said we just need to update a single txt
file
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Sophie Gautier
gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Short news from the BSA in French. So it's up and running since last
week. Today, I've documented our process on the wiki for our team [1].
I propose that we let a period of tests/improvements for about 2
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most
because of the Ubuntu issue.
Can we maybe make the wording
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi there,
I still see all the old release numbers in the version field of bugzilla...
I thought to see only 3.3 all versions while I still see 3.3.0, 3.3.1,
3.3.2 and so long...
Hi Tommy,
We've collapsed the version numbers in the
Robinson hath chiseled into stone tablets:
One option available to us in Bugzilla is to hide certain versions on
the New Bug page, but to still make them available when editing a bug.
This would allow us to simplify the number of versions available for a
new report, but then allow us to
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
so, indeed, I managed today to set up the rest, including some useful
plugins.
Please test this Etherpad and let me know any issues you discover. ;-)
However, be *CAREFUL* - it's still in testing mode
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
After a long discussion with Robinson we came up with a quasi workable plan
for what we hope to be the new setup for send feedback...
...
...
Before we move forward looking for feedback, Robinson feel free to
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:07:36PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
b) Robinson's main point about ask site is that they don't have the man
power to be QA's screeners - I think that summarizes his stance in the
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Still that cant be learned by telling them you should have filed the
bug on that system which you dont understand
Hmm...I think that if someone wants to report a bug, we should send
them to the bug
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:18:07PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
So it sounds like some kind of differentiation page (ala Mozilla)
could be our biggest win here.
I'll try to mock-up an example of how
(Apologies if I'm a couple of days late to the party...catching up on
emails here)
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Rob Snelders r...@ertai.nl wrote:
I think we need _really need_ our own bugzilla so we can tweak that install
that it suits us better.
Yes, many of us agree. But we've punted on
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Another option is to have a US call later in the day maybe once a month
to go over the normal call and get more people in our timezones involved
with projects - if this is a possibility then I can give everyone my
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Now the question is - how do we reach out to the NA community and say we
need to balance out our teams! - a couple people from the triage contest
were from the US - wonder if they'd be interested.
We could go with the
Hello all,
Minutes from our QA meeting today are available here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/July_26
Our next QA Meeting will be in 2 weeks on August 9th. Agenda may be found here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/August_09
- - - - - - -
New! QA
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
So it looks like we have at least 5 people from North America who are
interested in participating so I say let's do it.
nifty!
Date: August 2nd, 2013
Time: 1500 (EST) so for those on the west coast we're
[cc'ing QA, as they might have some suggestions here...]
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I do not know that 4.1.0 would be the best to start a user on,
personallythat is. Some would say 3.6.7 would be best for business users,
but
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
https://twitter.com/kittylyst/status/363311652076544000
Ben Evans @kittylyst 2h
@Sweetshark1 That's not even the 4th most annoying thing
about @bugzilla bug reporting.
Now I'm really curious about the
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Today we received a new issue from the FR BSA. There was a document joined
to the bug report from what said the reporter but the attachment didn't
reach our qa list.
Do you know if it's an issue with the FR BSA
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
So the reporter just sent a mail to the list that he didn't find how to
attach a document to the form. I can't test this evening but will do
tomorrow and send you my feedback.
I just took a quick look at the BSA code, and
Hi all,
Minutes from our QA Meeting and our Pub Chat are available here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/August_09
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/August_02_NA_Pub_Chat
Our next scheduled QA Meeting will be on August 23rd, and our next Pub
Chat will be
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
I have troubles joining in august. I hope to be part of it in september
Tommy -- Sorry to hear that you had trouble joining the call.
Were you having technical difficulty? We might be able to help you
triage the problem :-)
--R
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Jochen oo...@jochenschiffers.de wrote:
Hi Robinson,
my thoughts are
1) wow - great idea and good plan/implementation
Thanks! We hope that people like it :-)
Then
2) What benefits?
There are a number of reasons for us to migrate to our own bugtracker.
Off
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:58 PM, bfoman bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Robinson Tryon wrote
1) Ping our users:
- Ask our FDO users for permission to include their accounts/data in
the new install (this could be as simple as a mass-email asking for
them to reply back to us, or a small
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
It would be great to avoid the ask for permission step if possible. It
would be a lot of work.
It would be a lot of work; yes, we should ask a lawyer :-)
Note that the overloaded FDO bugzilla admins
would need to extract
Marc O'Brien, co-founder of ProjectLibre, stopped by the dev list to say hi
(see his message at the end of this email).
Marc - Please feel welcome to ping the QA Team on this list or to stop by
our IRC channel on freenode (#libreoffice-qa). If you have any questions
about how we approach QA or
Hi all,
Our bi-weekly public QA Call is tomorrow. All are welcome!
The Agenda and information for joining-in are available here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/August_23
Cheers,
--R
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
I think it's useless both on freedesktop and BSA.
few users use that and most of the time they use inappropriately (I cleaned
up some reports with see in summary tag but no version indicated in the
summary).
I think it should be
Hi all,
Minutes from today's QA Meeting are available here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/August_23
Our next QA Meeting will be in 2 weeks:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/September_06
I hope everyone has had a wonderful Friday and (weather
Hi everyone,
I'm resurrecting this thread to let you know that we're going to
revisit the QA Call Time and the 'Pub Chat' Time in about a month,
after the LibreOffice Conference. Between the primary QA Meetings and
the 'Pub Chats,' we hope that everyone who's involved with QA is able
to find a
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
AFAIK the bibisect is a Linux thing and there's nothing like this on
Windows.
Window user can however do manual regression tests using the portable
X-LibreOffice version developed from winPenPack.
here's their repository including
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:19 PM, bjoern
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:58:23AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Assuming that those builds can be unzipped and run, if we shoved those
builds into a git repo we could (potentially) get a similar workflow
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:29:50 +0200, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming that those builds can be unzipped and run...
those .zip files once unzipped before running do a brief initial setup
asking which
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Florian Reisinger
flo...@libreoffice.org wrote:
Hi,
Why not simply use a parallel Installation?
[bibisect repo with release versions for Windows]
I think that there are a number of really good advantages to using a
bibisect repo over multiple installs,
1 - 100 of 466 matches
Mail list logo
