On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:38 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Murray Cumming [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I think I did that in libsigc++ 2.1.x. Have
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 21:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Hi all,
I've been doing some test builds with g++-4.3 (on Debian, naturally),
to see what sort of preparation will be needed before it's released as
stable. One of the
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 21:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
The typedef in question is protected by a #ifdef and a comment saying
that it
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:38 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 21:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
The typedef in
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Hi all,
I've been doing some test builds with g++-4.3 (on Debian, naturally),
to see what sort of preparation will be needed before it's released as
stable. One of the packages I was trying to build bombed with this
error:
Hi all,
I've been doing some test builds with g++-4.3 (on Debian, naturally),
to see what sort of preparation will be needed before it's released as
stable. One of the packages I was trying to build bombed with this
error:
/usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/signal.h:1675: error: declaration of
