Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Hi Just trying to pay attention to topic "Add libssh2_agent_sign() to allow sign any message" =)https://www.libssh2.org/mail/libssh2-devel-archive-2020-09/0004.shtml https://github.com/libssh2/libssh2/pull/516Оf cause it is not blocker for release 1.9.1. May be it is candidate for 1.10.0 - I'm not

RE: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Just checking in here on what if anything is needed to release this version? Ryan Kelley -Original Message- From: Will Cosgrove Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 5:45 PM To: libssh2 development Subject: Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look Yup, sure. There are some features

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

On 19.05.21 21:20, Marc Hoersken wrote: > Good progress can be found here: > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/mback2k/libssh2/build/job/dtp4y5s7p8fk1cdm > > The Docker container is now being run on GitHub Actions instead of > DigitalOcean, so we don't rely on someone paying that. Another update

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

I am currently working on making the tests work again on AppVeyor and would like to merge your changes after that to see if they break anything there. Good progress can be found here: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/mback2k/libssh2/build/job/dtp4y5s7p8fk1cdm The Docker container is now

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Hello, The latest tarball (https://www.libssh2.org/snapshots/libssh2-1.9.0-20210519.tar.gz) is working fine. Thanks for the quick merges. Regards, Laurent On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:17:59AM -0700, Will Cosgrove wrote: Hi All, We are pulling together the 1.9.1 release and I’d request, if you

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Hello, Am 18.05.2021 um 10:57 schrieb Laurent Stacul: I was also wondering if you would mind integrating the PRs I did to be able to the the tests inside an OCI container: - https://github.com/libssh2/libssh2/pull/557 - https://github.com/libssh2/libssh2/pull/560 -

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Hello, In fact, there was still some missing file in the daily tarball (https://libssh2.org/snapshots/libssh2-1.9.0-20210518.tar.gz). I provided a PR to solve this (https://github.com/libssh2/libssh2/pull/604). I was also wondering if you would mind integrating the PRs I did to be able to the

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Hello, I am giving a try to libssh2 1.10.0. I tool the snapshot of 20210517 (https://libssh2.org/snapshots/libssh2-1.9.0-20210517.tar.gz). Build with CMake is ok but running the tests fails: + ctest --output-on-failure Test project

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Yup, sure. There are some features added so that makes sense. I’ll update the change logs PR to refer to 1.10. Will > On May 14, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > > On Wed, 12 May 2021, Will Cosgrove wrote: > >> We are pulling together the 1.9.1 release and I’d request, if you

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

On Wed, 12 May 2021, Will Cosgrove wrote: We are pulling together the 1.9.1 release and I’d request, if you haven’t already, give the main branch a sanity pass with your existing code and get any last minute issues submitted ASAP. There are a few changes and improvementslanded since 1.9.0

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

I do apprecate the efforts! In fact, I couldn’t run autoreconf with the configure.ac file as-is on my Mac (PR #594 if anyone is interested) so copying your old config file was fine for a quick test. Cheers, Will >>> Dan Fandrich in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Wed, 12 May 2021 17:41:16

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Dan Fandrich in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Thu, 13 May 2021 00:18:21 -0700): >On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 08:09:57AM +0200, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >> Dan Fandrich in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Wed, 12 May 2021 17:41:16 >> >The command "autoreconf -if" will generate the configure file from the

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

On Wed, 12 May 2021, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Are the dauly snapshots at https://www.libssh2.org/snapshots/ snapshots of the main branch? Yes they are! -- / daniel.haxx.se ___ libssh2-devel https://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 08:09:57AM +0200, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Dan Fandrich in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Wed, 12 May 2021 17:41:16 > >The command "autoreconf -if" will generate the configure file from the > >source. > >That's a standard autotools command that works in just about any

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Dan Fandrich in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Wed, 12 May 2021 17:41:16 -0700): >On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:00:42AM +0200, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >> That was a bit hard, as neither the snapshots nor github contained >> ./configure. And the script at https://github.com/Frugghi/iSSH2 really >> needs

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:00:42AM +0200, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > That was a bit hard, as neither the snapshots nor github contained > ./configure. And the script at https://github.com/Frugghi/iSSH2 really > needs it. I was compiling on a Mac with macOS Big Sur 11.3.1. No autotools > installed. The

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Will Cosgrove in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Wed, 12 May 2021 11:46:22 -0700): >Looks like they are! Otherwise, you can clone it from github >(https://github.com/libssh2/libssh2 ) >and build it. That was a bit hard, as neither the snapshots nor github

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Looks like they are! Otherwise, you can clone it from github (https://github.com/libssh2/libssh2 ) and build it. Cheers, Will > On May 12, 2021, at 11:34 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > > Will Cosgrove in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Wed, 12 May 2021 >

Re: 1.9.1 release pending, please give it a look

Will Cosgrove in gmane.network.ssh.libssh2.devel (Wed, 12 May 2021 09:17:59 -0700): >We are pulling together the 1.9.1 release and I’d request, if you haven’t >already, give the main branch a sanity pass with your existing code and >get any last minute issues submitted ASAP. Are the dauly