Dave Korn wrote:
Now we twiddle our thumbs and wait for the paperwork, I guess!
Hmm. Or potentially not. I just submitted the patch (backported to GCC's
forked libtool) to the gcc-patches list(*). As far as I understand it, that
means I have now assigned my copyright in the patch to the
* Dave Korn wrote on Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:50:22AM CEST:
Dave Korn wrote:
Now we twiddle our thumbs and wait for the paperwork, I guess!
Hmm. Or potentially not.
I'll have a review for the patch; at least for Libtool, it needs further
work.
Cheers,
Ralf
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Michel Briand wrote:
Does anyone uses 10 or 16 to refer to their ABI ? Hum... So those
numbers have to be managed somewhere...
If developers and users are ok with X.Y.Z then the CURRENT, REVISION
and AGE is a different scheme to learn and to implement in the build
system:
Hello Pankaj,
please don't top-post, that is considered rude on this mailing list.
* Agrawal, Pankaj wrote on Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:48:53AM CEST:
From: Ralf Wildenhues
./configure --disable-shared CC=gcc
make CCLD='purify gcc'
