Jef Driesen jefdrie...@hotmail.com - Mon, 03 May 2010 20:24:09 +0200
On 03/05/10 20:00, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Jef,
* Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:08:14AM CEST:
On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
The git master version of
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de - Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:34:09
+0200
Hello Michel,
* Michel Briand wrote on Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:46:00AM CEST:
Personally I've always seen interface as a contract.
A contract between a library writer and library user.
Yes.
Why does libtool want
Charles Wilson libt...@cwilson.fastmail.fm - Tue, 11 Aug 2009
14:50:33 -0400
Michel Briand wrote:
This last variable is crafted
crafted? This is your mistake.
to reflect the usual versioning. I.e. if
I want the version to 1.22.5,
Why? Why do you CARE what the internal ABI version number
The whole story is that I never wanted to use libtool in the first
place.
And, now, I know why :).
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Sorry for my last post : too quick answer :))
Charles Wilson cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm - Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:45:58
-0400
Michel Briand wrote:
Thank you, but, sorry, I'm not convinced. Remember what I said a
few mails ago: that's all of interface contract = same concept as
your...
Does
Joseph Garvin joseph.h.gar...@gmail.com - Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:02:18
-0500
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Joseph Garvinjoseph.h.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I read a description of libtool's versioning here:
Adam Mercer ramer...@gmail.com - Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:33:35 -0500
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 00:25, Vincent Torrivto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
Is it possible to add AM_SILENT_RULES only when automake version is = 1.11,
that is is there a good way to retrieve the version of automake in
configure.ac
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de - Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:39:16
+0100
Hello Michel,
* Michel Briand wrote on Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:34:41PM CET:
I've a grave problem : when I build my Debian package the libtool
install mode was not called. In the resulting package
the /usr/bin/freewrl
the libtool documentation for more information.
Any idea ?
Michel
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de - Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:28:17
+0100
Hello Michel,
* Michel Briand wrote on Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:41:42PM CET:
plugin_LTLIBRARIES = libFreeWRLplugin.la
plugindir=$(PLUGIN_DIR) # configure puts
`/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/freewrl-1.22.0'
Michel Briand michelbri...@free.fr - Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:16:41 +0100
Hi all,
I've a grave problem : when I build my Debian package the libtool
install mode
, Aerobiology Research i...@aerobiology.ca
À: Michel Briand michelbri...@free.fr
Cc: John A. Stewart alex.stew...@crc.ca
Sujet: Re: FreeWRL plugin, libtool problem
To elaborate further:
From my research, rpath is absolutely required to use libtool, and rpath
is supposed to be set to the final
Hi all,
I wonder if it's possible to tell libtool to generate .lo file
elsewhere than in source directory (where Makefile resides).
Best regards,
Michel
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:27:33
+0100
Hello Michel,
* Michel Briand wrote on Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:19:29AM CET:
Brian Gough [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:34:45 +
Does anyone have any good ways to check that updates to -version-info
numbers
herman bastiaens [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:50:44 +
* Bernd Jendrissek wrote on Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:32:08PM CET:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:52 PM, herman bastiaens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
is there a way to stop libtool from compiling everything twice? I am
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:51:53
+0100
For all dolt junkies, and whoever claims autotools and esp. libtool
are performance hogs: yes, they are still not the fastest thing in
the world. But we are getting better:
WOW! Great performances ;)
As an example, I built
Hi,
I got this strange error, building cinelerra,
on Ubuntu 8.10, with libtool 2.2.4 :
make[4]: entrant dans le répertoire «
/home/michel/cinelerra-git20081121/quicktime »
/bin/bash ../mkinstalldirs /home/michel/cinelerra-git20081121/debian/tmp/usr/lib
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC
Michel Briand [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:15:15 +0100
Hi,
I got this strange error, building cinelerra,
on Ubuntu 8.10, with libtool 2.2.4 :
make[4]: entrant dans le répertoire «
/home/michel/cinelerra-git20081121/quicktime »
/bin/bash ../mkinstalldirs
/home/michel/cinelerra
Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue, 21 Oct 2008
18:32:23 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Michel Briand wrote:
Honestly I wanted to do two optimizations.
Firstly, I've tested /bin/dash and seen that it's much faster
than /bin/bash on my normal sized project.
- is it possible to choose
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:43:07
+0200
Hello Michel,
* Michel Briand wrote on Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:03:29PM CEST:
Referring to GNU Automake manual §8.1.2, I'm using the myprog_LDADD
variable in my Makfile.am to link it with my library built in the same
Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:34:18 -0700
Thus, I wrote Dolt, a drop-in replacement for libtool's compilation
mode.
Excellent, impressive :)))
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
20 matches
Mail list logo
