Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-10-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote: On 09/27/2010 03:41 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: ‎Thanks for the explanation! On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhuesralf.wildenh...@gmx.de   wrote: Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-10-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Charles Wilson libt...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote: Please, over the past three months there were hundreds of messages discussing sysroot and how it shoold be handled.  While libtool's support is not yet complete, what IS there is the result of those discussions.  

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-10-01 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/1/2010 4:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Charles Wilson please-don't-feed-the-spammers wrote: ^^^ Please, over the past three months there were hundreds of messages discussing sysroot and how it shoold be handled. While

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 09/27/2010 03:41 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: ‎Thanks for the explanation! On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhuesralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake variable? Because we know DESTDIR far too late, only at 'make install'

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/30/2010 7:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Note that it's perfectly possible to use .la files on the final system that didn't go through libtool --mode=finish, as long as all the packages you compile are upgraded to Libtool 2.4 (and IIUC, cygwin's packaging system for example is already

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Alon, * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:41:36PM CEST: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake variable? Because we know DESTDIR far too late, only at 'make install' time and not

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-25 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
New in 2.4 2010-09-22:        • New features: - Sysroot support. This allows you to build cross-compiled packages with the same prefix that will be used on the destination machine, and still find dependent libraries under the compiler's sysroot. Without sysroot support, paths internal to

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable], yet might not be an immediate drop in replacement for version 2.2.10

2010-09-25 Thread Kyle Sallee
I wondered the same as did Alon. Also I noticed that httpd version 2.2.16 failed compilation with libtool version 2.4 installed Compile log looks like: found apr source: srclib/apr found apr-util source: srclib/apr-util rebuilding srclib/apr/configure buildconf: checking installation...

Re: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Alon, * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:53:36AM CEST: - Sysroot support. This allows you to build cross-compiled packages with the same prefix that will be used on the destination machine, and still find dependent libraries under the compiler's sysroot. Without sysroot

Libtool 2.4 and APR (was: GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable], yet might not be an immediate) drop in replacement for version 2.2.10

2010-09-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Kyle, please don't top-post, thanks. * Kyle Sallee wrote on Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 03:52:28PM CEST: Also I noticed that httpd version 2.2.16 failed compilation with libtool version 2.4 installed Compile log looks like: found apr source: srclib/apr found apr-util source:

GNU Libtool 2.4 released [stable]

2010-09-24 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
[[Repost: the original disappeared into an internet email black hole]] Libtoolers! The Libtool Team is pleased to announce the release of GNU Libtool 2.4. GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl,