Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0210151350390.21156-20;scooby.simplesystems.org:
The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
(mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
consists of contributions from Elizabeth
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Is your patch against CVS head? Or the release 1.4.2?
CVS head.
Bob
Earnie.
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
(mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
consists
The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
(mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts.
The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently are under
Cygwin. Any change to
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
(mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts.
The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently are
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
I am posting this patch with the expectation that concerned parties
will inspect it, test it, and send any fixes so that it can be
incorporated in libtool 1.5.
Please note that Cygwin's patched libtool contains a modification to
postinstall_cmds,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Charles Wilson wrote:
quick question: what pattern is used to name the dlls, implibs, and
statlibs? (I don't care, I just want to avoid confusion with the cygwin DLL
names). On cygwin, we use:
cygbase-number.dll (where number= 'current' - 'age')
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
(mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts.
The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently
A modified version of this patch is now in libtool CVS. The best way
to verify that it works is to try libtool CVS for your packages under
MinGW and Cygwin (one Cygwin part was modified so the implementation
could be shared).
Note that installing DLLs into $(libdir)/../bin seems to be a bit of
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The MinGW patch uses libbase-number.dll for DLL naming,
I thought the consensus was base-number.dll (no lib)? Or am I
remembering wrongly?
Max.
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The MinGW patch uses libbase-number.dll for DLL naming, otherwise
the naming is the same as Cygwin.
Cool. I'm happy.
This problem has already been anticipated and addressed.
Good to know.
The patch looks for an existing Cygwin installation and tries to
Max Bowsher wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The MinGW patch uses libbase-number.dll for DLL naming,
I thought the consensus was base-number.dll (no lib)? Or am I
remembering wrongly?
I prefer Bob's method.
Earnie.
___
Libtool mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo