Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-21 Thread Soren A
Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0210151350390.21156-20;scooby.simplesystems.org: The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It consists of contributions from Elizabeth

Re: [Mingw-msys] Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-19 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Earnie Boyd wrote: Is your patch against CVS head? Or the release 1.4.2? CVS head. Bob Earnie. Bob Friesenhahn wrote: The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It consists

Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts. The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently are under Cygwin. Any change to

Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Max Bowsher
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts. The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently are

Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote: I am posting this patch with the expectation that concerned parties will inspect it, test it, and send any fixes so that it can be incorporated in libtool 1.5. Please note that Cygwin's patched libtool contains a modification to postinstall_cmds,

Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Charles Wilson wrote: quick question: what pattern is used to name the dlls, implibs, and statlibs? (I don't care, I just want to avoid confusion with the cygwin DLL names). On cygwin, we use: cygbase-number.dll (where number= 'current' - 'age')

Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts. The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently

Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
A modified version of this patch is now in libtool CVS. The best way to verify that it works is to try libtool CVS for your packages under MinGW and Cygwin (one Cygwin part was modified so the implementation could be shared). Note that installing DLLs into $(libdir)/../bin seems to be a bit of

Re: [Mingw-msys] Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Max Bowsher
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: The MinGW patch uses libbase-number.dll for DLL naming, I thought the consensus was base-number.dll (no lib)? Or am I remembering wrongly? Max. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: The MinGW patch uses libbase-number.dll for DLL naming, otherwise the naming is the same as Cygwin. Cool. I'm happy. This problem has already been anticipated and addressed. Good to know. The patch looks for an existing Cygwin installation and tries to

Re: [Mingw-msys] Re: Proposed libtool patch for MinGW

2002-10-15 Thread Earnie Boyd
Max Bowsher wrote: Bob Friesenhahn wrote: The MinGW patch uses libbase-number.dll for DLL naming, I thought the consensus was base-number.dll (no lib)? Or am I remembering wrongly? I prefer Bob's method. Earnie. ___ Libtool mailing list